Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:51:26.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Behaviour of sheep freely grazed on Gökçeada Island (Turkey) rangeland reclaimed by different methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 March 2017

C. TÖLÜ Open the ORCID record for C. TÖLÜ [Opens in a new window] ,
F. ALATÜRK ,
A. ÖZASLAN PARLAK  and
A. GÖKKUŞ
C. TÖLÜ*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale, Turkey
F. ALATÜRK
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale, Turkey
A. ÖZASLAN PARLAK
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale, Turkey
A. GÖKKUŞ
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale, Turkey
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Extensive sheep and goat farming is common in the rangelands of Gökçeada Island, NW Turkey. The aim of the current study was to investigate the behaviour of indigenous Gökçeada sheep over these rangelands and factors influencing their behavioural characteristics. Grubbing (with chisel ploughing to a depth of 20 cm), burning (the entire top part of plants) and cutting (10–15 cm stalk on the surface of the soil) were carried out on selected rangeland to reduce prickly burnet (Sarcopoterium spinosum (L.) Spach) from the vegetative covering, then forage crop seeds were sown to improve plant cover. Forty head of Gökçeada-bred sheep were placed in eight fenced plots (half seeded, half unseeded) on reclaimed and natural rangeland for 2 years. Sheep behaviour was observed for a period of 1 year. Each plot was arranged with a stocking rate of 2·67 sheep/ha and contained five sheep that grazed freely within each plot. Sheep behaviour was observed diurnally through direct observation by time sampling (10 min) and continuous sampling methods. During the period of 1 year, the observed sheep spent an average of 0·53 of their time grazing in daylight, 0·30 of their time in rangelands on other activities and 0·17 in the paddocks. Significant differences were observed in the time of grazing, resting, locomotion and rumination by season. The highest grazing ratio was noticed in spring while the lowest was in summer. Sheep exhibited walking behaviour 10·6 times/day. The sheep mostly (0·66) grazed on prickly burnet throughout the year although, when available, they tended to prefer herbaceous plants. The behaviour of sheep in the two natural (unreclaimed) plots was significantly different from those placed in other plots, mainly due to the mass of prickly burnet shrub found in the natural plots.

Type
Animal Research Papers
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 155 , Issue 6 , August 2017 , pp. 993 - 1004
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akbaǧ, H. I., Tölü, C. & Baytekin, H. (2013). Abdestbozan (Sarcopoterium spinosum) bitkisinin besleme potansiyeli (Nutritional potential of Sarcopoterium spinosum). In VII. Ulusal Hayvan Besleme Kongresi (Ed. Vice Chairman of Congress Küçükersan, M. K.), pp. 335–338. Ankara, Turkey: Hayvan Beslenme Bilim Derneǧi.Google Scholar
Aktürk, D., Savran, F., Hakyemez, H., Daş, G. & Savaş, T. (2005). Gökçeada'da ekstansif koşullarda hayvancılık yapan işletmelerin sosyo-ekonomik açıdan incelenmesi (Socio-economic analysis of animal breeding enterprises under extensive conditions in Gökçeada). Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 11, 229–235.Google Scholar
Animut, G., Goetsch, A. L., Aiken, G. E., Puchala, R., Detweiler, G., Krehbiel, C. R., Merkel, R. C., Sahlu, T., Dawson, L. J., Johnson, Z. B. & Gipson, T. A. (2005). Grazing behaviour and energy expenditure by sheep and goats co-grazing grass/forb pastures at three stocking rates. Small Ruminant Research 59, 191–201.Google Scholar
Anonymous (2013 a). Statistics. Çanakkale, Turkey: Çanakkale Sheep and Goat Association.Google Scholar
Anonymous (2013 b). Yıllık İklim Verileri. Ankara, Turkey: Meteoroloji Genel Müdürlüǧü.Google Scholar
AOAC (1990). Official Methods of Analysis, 15th edn. Arlington, VA, USA: AOAC.Google Scholar
AOAC (2000). Official Methods of Analysis, 17th edn. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: AOAC.Google Scholar
Arnold, G. W. (1982). Some factors affecting the grazing behaviour of sheep in winter in New South Wales. Applied Animal Ethology 8, 119–125.Google Scholar
Bailey, D. W., Gross, J. E., Laca, E. A., Rittenhouse, L. R., Coughenour, M. B., Swift, D. M. & Sims, P. L. (1996). Mechanisms that result in large herbivore grazing distribution patterns. Journal of Range Management 49, 386–400.Google Scholar
Barry, T. N., Manley, T. R. & Duncan, S. J. (1986). The role of condensed tannins in the nutritional value of Lotus pedunculatus for sheep. 4. Sites of carbohydrate and protein digestion as influenced by dietary reactive tannin concentration. British Journal of Nutrition 55, 123–137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartolomé, J., Franch, J., Plaixats, J. & Seligman, N. G. (1998). Diet selection by sheep and goats on Mediterranean health-woodland range. Journal of Range Management 51, 383–391.Google Scholar
Bartolomé, J., Franch, J., Plaixats, J. & Seligman, N. G. (2000). Grazing alone is not enough to maintain landscape diversity in the Montseny Biosphere Reserve. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 77, 267–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremner, J. M. (1960). Determination of nitrogen in soil by Kjeldahl method. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 55, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canas, R. C., Quiroz, R. A., León-Velarde, C., Posadas, A. & Osorio, J. (2003). Quantifying energy dissipation by grazing animals in harsh environments. Journal of Theoretical Biology 225, 351–359.Google Scholar
Celaya, R., Olivan, M., Ferreira, L. M. M., Martinez, A., Garcia, U. & Osoro, K. (2007). Comparison of grazing behaviour, dietary overlap and performance in non-lactating domestic ruminants grazing on marginal heathland areas. Livestock Science 106, 271–281.Google Scholar
Cook, C. W. & Stubbendieck, J. (1986). Range Research: Basic Problems and Techniques. Denver, Colorado, USA: Society for Range Management.Google Scholar
El Aich, A., El Assouli, N., Fathi, A., Morand-Fehr, P. & Bourbouze, A. (2007). Ingestive behavior of goats grazing in the Southwestern Argan (Argania spinosa) forest of Morocco. Small Ruminant Research 70, 248–256.Google Scholar
Evangelou, C., Yiakoulaki, M. & Papanastasis, V. (2014). Spatio-temporal analysis of sheep and goats grazing in different forage resources of Northern Greece. Hacquetia 13, 205–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, L. M. M., Celaya, R., Benavides, R., Jauregui, B. M., Garcia, U., Santos, A. S., Grazia, R. R., Rodrigues, M. A. M. & Osoro, K. (2013). Foraging behaviour of domestic herbivore species grazing on heathlands associated with improved pasture areas. Livestock Science 155, 373–383.Google Scholar
Gökkuş, A., Parlak, A. O., Baytekin, H. & Alatürk, F. (2013). Gökçeada'nın çalılı mera ekosistemlerinde aptesbozan (Sarcopoterium spinosum (L.) Spach) mücadelesi (Prickly Shrubby Burnet (Sarcopoterium spinosum (L.) Spach) controlling in shrubland ecosystems of Gökçeada). ÇOMÜ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 1, 67–72.Google Scholar
Hadjigeorgiou, I., Papavasiliou, D. & Zervas, G. (1997). Quality products from extensive mixed farming systems. The case of Lesvos Island in Greece. In Livestock Farming Systems: more than Food Production. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Livestock Farming Systems (Ed. Sorensen, J. T.), pp. 201–205. EAAP Publication No. 89. Foulum, Denmark: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
Hadjigeorgiou, I., Vaitsis, T., Laskaridis, G., Tzanni, C. (2008). Restoring semi-arid rangelands on a Greek Aegean Island. CIHEAM, Options Méditerranéennes, Series A 79, 33–36.Google Scholar
Harris, P. S. & O'Connor, K. F. (1980). The grazing behavior of sheep (Ovis aries) on a high-country summer range in Canterbury, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 3, 85–96.Google Scholar
Henkin, Z., Noy-Meir, I., Kafkafi, U. & Gutman, M. (1998). Rehabilitation of Mediterranean dwarf-shrub range-land with herbicides, fertilizers, and fire. Journal of Range Management 51, 193–199.Google Scholar
Henkin, Z., Seligman, N. G. & Noy-Meir, I. (2007). Successional transitions and management of a phosphorus-limited shrubland ecosystem. Rangeland Ecology & Management 60, 453–463.Google Scholar
Kronberg, S. L. & Malechek, J. C. (1997). Relationships between nutrition and foraging behavior of free-ranging sheep and goats. Journal of Animal Science 75, 1756–1763.Google Scholar
Lachica, M. & Aguilera, J. F. (2005). Energy needs of the free-ranging goat. Small Ruminant Research 60, 111–125.Google Scholar
Lantieri, A., Guglielmo, A., Pavone, P. & Salmeri, C. (2013). Seed germination in Sarcopoterium spinosum (L.) Spach from South-Eastern Sicily. Plant Biosystems 147, 60–63.Google Scholar
Makkar, H. P. S., Blümmel, M. & Becker, K. (1995). Formation of complexes between polyvinyl pyrrolidones or polyethylene glycols and tannins, and their implication in gas production and true digestibility in in vitro techniques. British Journal of Nutrition 73, 897–913.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ouedraogo-Kone, S., Kabore-Zoungrana, C. Y. & Ledin, I. (2006). Behaviour of goats, sheep and cattle on natural pasture in the sub-humid zone of West Africa. Livestock Science 105, 244–252.Google Scholar
Papachristou, T. G. (1997). Foraging behaviour of goats and sheep on Mediterranean kermes oak shrublands. Small Ruminant Research 24, 85–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papachristou, T. G. (2000). Dietary selection by goats and sheep in kermes oak shrublands of northern Greece: influence of shrub cover and grazing season. In Sheep and Goat Nutrition: Intake, Digestion, Quality of Products and Rangelands (Eds Ledin, I. & Morand-Fehr, P.), pp. 161–164. Cahiers Options Méditerranéennes; n. 52. Zaragoza, Spain: CIHEAM.Google Scholar
Papachristou, T. G. & Nastis, A. S. (1993). Nutritive value of diet selected by goats grazing on kermes oak shrublands with different shrub and herbage cover in Northern Greece. Small Ruminant Research 12, 35–44.Google Scholar
Papanastasis, V. P. (1980). Effects of season and frequency of burning on a phryganic rangeland in Greece. Journal of Range Management 33, 251–255.Google Scholar
Parker, K. W. & Harris, R. W. (1959). The 3-step method for measuring condition and trend of forest ranges: a resume of its history, development and use. In Techniques and Methods of Measuring Understory Vegetation (Ed. Tifton, G. A.), pp. 55–69. Southern and Southeastern Forest Experiment Station Proceedings. Washington, DC, USA: USDA.Google Scholar
Perevolotsky, A., Ne'Eman, G., Yonatan, R. & Henkin, Z. (2001). Resilience of prickly burnet to management in east Mediterranean rangelands. Journal of Range Management 54, 561–566.Google Scholar
Rogosic, J., Estell, R. E., Skobic, D., Martinovic, A. & Maric, S. (2006). Role of species diversity and secondary compound complementarity on diet selection of Mediterranean shrubs by goats. Journal of Chemical Ecology 32, 1279–1287.Google Scholar
Sanon, H. O., Kabore-Zoungrana, C. & Ledin, I. (2007). Behaviour of goats, sheep and cattle and their selection of browse species on natural pasture in a Sahelian area. Small Ruminant Research 67, 64–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS (1999). SAS OnlineDoc®, Version 8. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Schlecht, E., Hiernaux, P., Kadaoure, I., Hülsebusch, C. & Mahler, F. (2006). Spatio-temporal analysis of forage availability and grazing and excretion behaviour of herded and free grazing cattle, sheep and goats in Western Niger. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 113, 226–242.Google Scholar
Solanki, G. S. (2000). Grazing behaviour and foraging strategy of goats in semi-arid region in India. Tropical Ecology 41, 155–159.Google Scholar
Tölü, C. (2009). Studies on behaviour, health and performance traits of different goat genotypes. PhD thesis, University of Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart, Turkey.Google Scholar
Tölü, C. & Savaş, T. (2011). An important genotype for the Turkish Agro-Biodiversity: Gökçeada goat. In Sustainable Conservation of Livestock Breeds Diversity for the Future: Impact of Globalisation of Animal Breeding and the Loss of Farm Animal Genetic Diversity – A Conflict? RBI 8th Global Conference on the Conservation of Animal Genetic Resources, 4–8 October 2011 (Ed. Vice Chair of Conference Soysal, İ.), pp. 267–274. Tekirdaǧ, Türkiye: Namık Kemal University/RBI.Google Scholar
Tölü, C., Yurtman, İ. Y., Baytekin, H., Ataşoǧlu, C. & Savaş, T. (2012). Foraging strategies of goats in a pasture of wheat and shrubland. Animal Production Science 52, 1069–1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tölü, C., Savaş, T., Yurtman, İ. Y., Hakyemez, B. H. & Gökkuş, A. (2013 a). Buǧday hasılı ve doǧal mera ı̇le farklı otlatma yoǧunluklarının saǧmal keçilerin bazı davranış özelliklerine etkisi (The effect of wheat and natural pastures and of different grazing intensities on some behavioural traits of lactating goats). Tekirdaǧ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi (Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty) 10, 37–45.Google Scholar
Tölü, C., Akbaǧ, H. I., Yurtman, İ. Y., Baytekin, H. & Savaş, T. (2013 b). A study on usable plants for annual winter pastures for goats. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment 11, 892–896.Google Scholar
Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B. & Lewis, B. A. (1991). Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.Google Scholar
Yurtman, İ. Y., Savaş, T., Karaaǧaç, F., Çoşkuntuna, L. (2002). Effects of daily protein intake levels on the oral stereotypic behaviours in energy restricted lambs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 77, 77–88.Google Scholar