Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:21:38.128Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessment of groundnut cultivars for end-of-season drought tolerance in a Sahelian environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

B. J. Ndunguru ,
B. R. Ntare ,
J. H. Williams  and
D. C. Greenberg
B. J. Ndunguru
Affiliation:
SADC/ICRISAT Groundnut and ICRISAT Regional Pigeonpea Projects, PO Box 1096, Lilongwe, Malawi
B. R. Ntare
Affiliation:
ICRISAT Sahelian Centre, BP 12404, Niamey, Niger
J. H. Williams
Affiliation:
ICRISAT Sahelian Centre, BP 12404, Niamey, Niger
D. C. Greenberg
Affiliation:
23 Pierce Lane, Fulbourn, Cambridge CB1 5DJ, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A 2–year study (1990 and 1991) was conducted at the ICRISAT (International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics) Sahelian Centre, near Niamey, Niger, to select groundnut cultivars tolerant to drought and to examine selection techniques. Thirty-six cultivars known to vary in yield potential were grown under rainfed and irrigated conditions. Crop growth rate (C) and partitioning co-efficient (p) were estimated from phenological and final harvest data. The correlation between years was greater for partitioning than for pod yield (implying a higher heritability for p than for yield). Tolerance as determined by a drought susceptibility index for pod yield (SY), crop growth rate (Sc) and partitioning (Sp) to reproductive sinks showed thirteen cultivars as drought tolerant for either C or p or for both. The Sahelian cultivars 796, 55–437 and TS 32–1 were the most consistent for drought tolerance. Partitioning was the most important yield component affecting yield variation among cultivars.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 125 , Issue 1 , August 1995 , pp. 79 - 85
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bruckner, P. L. & Frohberg, R. C. (1987). Stress tolerance and adaptation in spring wheat. Crop Science 21, 31–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, J. M., Townley-Smith, T. F., McCaig, T. N. & Green, D. G. (1984). Growth analysis of spring wheat cultivars of varying drought resistance. Crop Science 24, 537–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, W. G., McCloud, D. E., McGraw, R. L. & Boote, K. J. (1978). Physiological aspects of peanut yield improvement. Crop Science 18, 1015–1020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, R. A. & Maurer, R. (1978). Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. 1. Grain yield responses. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 29, 897–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gautreau, J. (1982). Agronomic improvements by development of peanut varieties adapted to rainfall constraints. Oléagineux 37, 46–49.Google Scholar
Greenberg, D. C., Williams, J. H. & Ndunguru, B. J. (1992). Differences in yield determining processes of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) genotypes in varied drought environments. Annals of Applied Biology 120, 557–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, A. D. & Nelsen, C. E. (1980). Water: adaptation of crops to drought-prone environments. In The Biology of Crop Productivity (Ed. Carlson, P. S.), pp. 77–152. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, D., Matthews, R. B., Nageswara Rao, R. C. & Williams, J. H. (1988). The physiological basis of yield differences between four genotypes of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) in response to drought. 111. Developmental processes. Experimental Agriculture 24, 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludlow, M. M. & Muchow, R. C. (1988). Critical evaluation of the possibilities for modifying crops for high production per unit of precipitation. In Drought Research Priorities for the Dryland Tropics (Eds Bidinger, F. R. & Johansen, C.), pp. 179–211. India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics.Google Scholar
Matthews, R. B., Harris, D., Nageswara Rao, R. C., Williams, J. H. & Wadia, K. D. R. (1988). The physiological basis for yield differences between four genotypes of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) in response to drought. I. Dry matter production and water use. Experimental Agriculture 24, 191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nageswara Rao, R. C., Singh, Sardar, Sivakumar, M. V. K., Srivastava, K. L. & Williams, J. H. (1985). Effect of water deficit at different growth phases of peanut. I. Yield responses. Agronomy Journal 77, 782–786.Google Scholar
Nageswara Rao, R. C., Williams, J. H. & Murari, Singh (1989). Genotypic sensitivity to drought and yield potential of peanut. Agronomy Journal 81, 887–893.Google Scholar
Sivakumar, M. V. K. (1988). Predicting rainy season potential from the onset of rains in Southern Sahelian and Sudanian climatic zones of West Africa. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 42, 295–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sivakumar, M. V. K. (1991). Drought spells and drought frequencies in West Africa. Research Information Bulletin No. 13. Patancheru, India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics.Google Scholar
Virmani, S. M. & Singh, P. (1986). Agroclimatological characteristics of the groundnut growing regions in the semi-arid tropics. In Agrometeorology of Groundnut: Proceedings of an International Symposium, 21–26 August 1985, pp. 35–46. Patancheru: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics.Google Scholar
Williams, E. J. & Drexler, J. S. (1981). A non-destructive method for determining peanut pod maturity. Peanut Science, 8 134–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. H. (1992). Concepts for the application of crop physiological models for crop breeding. In Groundnut, A Global Perspective: Proceedings of an International Workshop, 25–29 November 1991 (Ed. Nigam, S. N.), pp. 345–351. Patancheru: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics.Google Scholar
Williams, J. H. & Saxena, N. P. (1991). The use of nondestructive measurement and physiological models of yield determination to investigate factors determining differences in seed yield between genotypes of ‘desi’ chickpeas (Cicer arietinum). Annals of Applied Biology 119, 105–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, G. C., Hubick, K. T. & Farquhar, G. D. (1991). Physiological analysis of peanut cultivar response to timing and duration of drought stress. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 42, 453–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar