Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:19:59.028Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An experiment comparing urea-formaldehyde fertilizer with ‘nitro-chalk’ for Italian ryegrass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

F. V. Widdowson
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts
A. Penny
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts
R. J. B. Williams
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts

Extract

1. Italian ryegrass was used in 1958 and in 1959 to compare ‘single’ spring dressings of urea-formaldehyde fertilizer (UF) with equivalent spring dressings of ‘Nitro-Chalk’ (NC), and with ‘repeated’ NC (divided equally between three cuttings). Barley measured residues in 1960.

2. At the first cut each year, yields from UF and repeated NC were similar, but later NC gave much larger yields. Aggregate increases from UF were less than half those from equivalent NC.

3. Both forma of nitrogen had residual value for grass and barley.

4. Maximum recovery of N, over 3 years, was 54% for UF and 90% for equivalent NC. Single NC dressings were recovered more completely than repeated dressings.

5. The maximum aggregate uptakes over 2 years by grass receiving 2·0 cwt. N/acre each year were 72 lb. P and 611 lb. K/acre.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Crowther, E. M. (1951). Rep. Rothamst. Expt. Sta.for 1951, p. 39.Google Scholar
Cunningham, R. K. & Cooke, G. W. (1958). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 9, 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasser, J. K. R. (1960). Rep. Rothamst. Expt. Sta.for 1960, p. 62.Google Scholar
Widdowson, F. V. & Shaw, K. (1960). J. Agric. Sci. 55, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar