Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T19:11:45.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An evaluation of tree legumes on an acid ultisol in South Sumatra, Indonesia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

G. J. Blair ,
Mas'ud Panjaitan ,
D. A. Ivory ,
B. Palmer  and
M. Sudjadi
G. J. Blair
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy & Soil Science, University of New England, Armidale, N.S.W. 2351, Australia
Mas'ud Panjaitan
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy & Soil Science, University of New England, Armidale, N.S.W. 2351, Australia
D. A. Ivory
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy & Soil Science, University of New England, Armidale, N.S.W. 2351, Australia
B. Palmer
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy & Soil Science, University of New England, Armidale, N.S.W. 2351, Australia
M. Sudjadi
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy & Soil Science, University of New England, Armidale, N.S.W. 2351, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Seventeen tree species (16 legumes and Eucalyptus saligna) were grown for 4 years on an Ultisol of pH 4·5 at Nakau, South Sumatra, Indonesia. Leaf and wood yields were recorded seven times during the 4-year period and mineral and plant quality measurements were made on leaf samples from the first harvest taken 2 years after transplanting. At this time, leaf and wood yields were highest from Acacia mangium but the yield of this species declined over time. Highest leaf production was recorded for Cassia siamea over the 4-year period.

Mineral analyses of leaf indicated N, K, Ca and Mg to be adequate for animal production in all species. P was below the critical level for animals in all species and Na levels were adequate only in Acacia mangium and Acacia auriculiformis.

Plant quality measures (ADF, NDF, lignin) suggest marked differences could be expected in potential feed value between species through differences in voluntary intake and digestibility.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 111 , Issue 3 , December 1988 , pp. 435 - 441
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1970). Official Methods of Analysis, 11th Edn.Washington D.C., U.S.A.: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.Google Scholar
Bamualin, A., Jones, R. J. & Murray, R. M. (1980). Nutritive value of tropical browse legumes in the dry season. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 13, 229–232.Google Scholar
Brewbaker, J. L. (1985). Leguminous trees and shrubs for Southeast Asia and the South Pacific. In Forages in S.E. Asian and S. Pacific Agriculture, ACIAR Proceedings Series No. 12, pp. 43–50. Canberra, Australia: ACIAR.Google Scholar
Catchpoole, D. W., Blair, G. J. & Ivory, D. A. (1986). The contribution of four tree legume species to feed supply and the nitrogen economy and forage systems in Indonesia. Forage Research Project Annual Report, pp. 41–42. Balai Penelitian Ternak, Ciawi, Indonesia.Google Scholar
Federer, W. T. & Raohavarao, D. (1975). On augmented designs. Biometrics 31, 29–35.Google Scholar
Goering, H. K. & Van Soest, P. J. (1970). Forage Fiber Analysis (Apparatus, Reagents, Procedures and some Applications). Agricultural Handbook No. 379. Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Horne, P. M., Catchpoole, D. W. & Ella, A. (1985). Cutting management of tree and shrub legumes. In Forages in S.E. Asian and S. Pacific Agriculture, ACIAR Proceedings Series No. 12, pp. 164–169. Canberra, Australia: ACIAR.Google Scholar
International Development Research Centre (1982). Leucaena research in the Asian-Pacific Region. Proceedings of a Workshop held in Singapore, 23–26 November 1982.Google Scholar
Minson, D. J., Stobbs, T. H., Hegarty, H. P. & Playne, M. J. (1976). Measuring the nutritive value of pasture plants. In Tropical Pasture Research – Principles and Methods (ed. Shaw, M. J. and Bryan, W. W.), pp. 308–337. Bulletin of the Commonwealth Agricultural Bureau of Pastures and Field Crops No. 51.Google Scholar
National Academy of Science, U.S.A. (1979). Tropical Legumes: Resources for the Future. Washington D.C.: U.S. National Academy of Science.Google Scholar
Panjaitan, M., Ivory, D. A. & Jessop, R. (1986). Regional evaluation of tree legume species and response to fertiliser application and rhizobium inoculation. Forage Research Project Annual Report, pp. 41–42. Balai Penelitian Ternak, Ciawi, Indonesia.Google Scholar
Siregar, M. E. (1983). Effect of cutting management on the yield and quality of tropical forage species. Proceedings of the 5th World Animal Production Conference, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 613–614.Google Scholar
Tan, K. C. (1982). Growth data from Sabah Softwoods Sdn. Bhd. Plantation of some fast-growing leguminous trees. Proceedings of a Workshop on Leucaena Research in the Asia-Pacific Region, Singapore, 23–26 November 1982.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. L., Sheard, R. W. & Moyer, J. R. (1967). Comparison of conventional and automated procedures for nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium analysis of plant material using a single digestion. Agronomy Journal 59, 240–243.Google Scholar
Tilo, S. M., Porala, D. B., Lales, E. H. & Paterno, E. S. (1981). Plant nutrition studies on Ipil-ipil (Leucaena leucocephala [Lam] de Wit). National In-house Review on Leucaena Research, 5–7 October 1981. Forest Research Institute UBLB, Philippines.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture (1975). Soil Taxonomy. A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. USDA Handbook 436 Washington DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. K., Sillane, T. A. & Clancy, M. J. (1966). The influence of fibre content on herbage intakes by ruminants. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 5, 142–143.Google Scholar