Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T18:38:44.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An evaluation of pasture quality with young grazing sheep. I. Live-weight growth and clean wool production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. R. Gallagher ,
B. R. Watkin  and
R. C. Grimes
J. R. Gallagher
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales
B. R. Watkin
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales
R. C. Grimes
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. In a grazing trial with sheep, cocksfoot, ryegrass and tall fescue were grown with and without white clover, under ‘short’ and ‘long’ management systems, and also white clover.

2. Live weights were recorded every 2-3 weeks, and wool production was estimated by clipping midside patches every month.

3. Sheep on grass plus clover plots were significantly superior to sheep on grass plots in terms of live-weight gain, final live weight and clean-wool production.

4. Sheep on ‘long’ pastures were significantly heavier than sheep on ‘short’ pastures for a month in the early part of the trial. Thereafter, differences in live weight were not significant.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 66 , Issue 1 , February 1966 , pp. 107 - 111
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bailey, R. W. (1964). N.Z. J. Agric. Res. 7, 496.Google Scholar
Duncan, D. B. (1955). Biometrics, 11, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, M. R. & Craig, J. (1961). J. Agric. W. Aust. 2, 3.Google Scholar
Grimes, R. C., Watkin, B. R. & Gallagher, J. R. (1966). J, Agric. Sci. 66, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, W. & MacLusky, D. S. (1955). J. Agric. Sci. 46, 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Large, R. V. & Spedding, C. R. W. (1962). Exps Prog. Grassld Res. Inst. no. 15, 52.Google Scholar
Large, R. V. & Spedding, C. R. W. (1964). J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 19, 255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, J. W., Thomson, G. G., Iversen, C. E., Jagusch, K. T. & Lawson, B. M. (1962). Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 22, 1.Google Scholar
Milford, R. (1962). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Rae, A. L., Brougham, R. W. & Barton, R. A. (1964). N.Z. J. Agric. Res. 7, 491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rae, A. L., Brougham, R. W., Glenday, A. C. & Butler, G. W. (1963). J. Agric. Sci. 61, 187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, T. W. (1956). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 7, 66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, J. L., Reardon, T. F. & Lambourne, L. J. (1963). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 14, 364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, O. B. & Schnickel, P. G. (1962). Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 4, 38.Google Scholar
Willoughby, W. M. (1959). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 9, 248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar