Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T21:37:53.050Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The ability of sheep at different stocking rates to maintain the quality and quantity of their diet during the grazing season

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2003

F. GARCIA
Affiliation:
INRA-Unité de Recherches sur les Herbivores, Relations Animal Plantes, Site de Theix, 63122 St-Genès-Champanelle, France INRA-Agronomie, Fonctionnement et Gestion de l'Ecosystème Prairial, 234 Av. du Brézet, 63039 Clermont-Ferrand, France
P. CARRÈRE
Affiliation:
INRA-Agronomie, Fonctionnement et Gestion de l'Ecosystème Prairial, 234 Av. du Brézet, 63039 Clermont-Ferrand, France
J. F. SOUSSANA
Affiliation:
INRA-Agronomie, Fonctionnement et Gestion de l'Ecosystème Prairial, 234 Av. du Brézet, 63039 Clermont-Ferrand, France
R. BAUMONT
Affiliation:
INRA-Unité de Recherches sur les Herbivores, Relations Animal Plantes, Site de Theix, 63122 St-Genès-Champanelle, France

Abstract

The degree to which grazers maintain the amount (organic matter intake) or the quality (organic matter digestibility) of their diet without adversely affecting the other component was addressed by investigating how sheep managed trade-offs between quantity and quality throughout the grazing season in an upland area of central France. Two groups of five dry ewes, grazing two plots of contrasting areas from April to the end of September 2000, were studied. On the smaller plot (1500 m2), the application of a high stocking rate (HSR) produced a resource of good quality but in low quantity; and on the larger plot (3000 m2), a low stocking rate (LSR) created a sward of low quality but in good quantity. In spring, in both conditions, the sheep maintained their intake of digestible organic matter (OM) at between 1000 and 1250 g/day. Both organic matter intake and digestibility remained high at both stocking rates. In summer, the intake of digestible OM decreased to between 750 and 1000 g/day. On HSR, this was mainly due to a decline of intake in relation to the decrease of intake rate and bite weight. On LSR a decrease in digestibility and to a lesser extent in intake was involved. At both stocking rates, the sheep maximized the digestibility of their diet by selecting the green laminae throughout the grazing season. In spring, the sheep modulated their daily grazing time to compensate the decrease in intake rate and maintained a high daily intake. In summer and autumn, the sheep failed to maintain their daily intake at the same level as previously observed. On both plots they modulated their daily grazing time to cover their needs (730 g/day), but they did not increase it further to maximize daily intake. This may be attributable to the costs involved in selecting (LSR) or taking (HSR) the best components from the sward.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2003 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)