Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T01:16:34.030Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The δ13C value of ruminant saliva and its effect on the estimation of the legume component of oesophageal extrusa samples

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. J. Jones  and
R. P. Lefeuvre
R. J. Jones
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Tropical Crops and Pastures, Davies Laboratory, Private Mail Bag, Post Office, Aitkenvale, Townsville, Queensland 4814, Australia
R. P. Lefeuvre
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Tropical Crops and Pastures, Davies Laboratory, Private Mail Bag, Post Office, Aitkenvale, Townsville, Queensland 4814, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The C3 and C4 plant components in extrusa samples from oesophageally fistulated cattle can be estimated by δ13Canalysis. However, contamination with saliva containing bicarbonates could cause bias in the estimation of the C3 or C4 components. Saliva from animals fed C4 and C3 diets had δ13C values of – 4.37/103 and –15.97/103, respectively. Both values showed a large positive shift of c. 10 units relative to the diets, but the difference between feeds was maintained in the saliva. On theoretical grounds, contamination of the ingested feed with saliva should have caused a small (1·3–3·4% legume) negative bias when estimating legume percentage in the diet. This did not occur when saliva of known (PC was added to mixtures of C3 and C4 forages which were dried, ground and analysed for δ13C. It is postulated that CO2 was lost from bicarbonate when saliva was dried in contact with fresh plant material, and so no significant bias was detected. It would appear that the δ13C technique can be used to estimate the proportion of C3 and C4 components in oesophageal extrusa samples without significant bias from salivary contamination.

Type
Review
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 113 , Issue 2 , October 1989 , pp. 199 - 202
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bailey, C. B. & Balch, C. C. (1961). Saliva excretion and its relation to feeding in cattle. II. The composition and rate of secretion of mixed saliva in the cow during rest. British Journal of Nutrition 15, 383–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefeuvre, R. P. & Jones, R. J. (1988). The static combustion of biological samples sealed in glass tubes as a preparation for β13C determination. Analyst 113, 817–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, H. (1957). Isotopic standards for carbon and oxygen and correction factors for mass spectrometric analysis of carbon dioxide. Geochimica el Cosmochimica Acta 12, 133–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. J., Ludlow, M. M., Troughton, J. H. & Blunt, C. G. (1979). Estimation of the proportion of C3 and C4 plant species in the diet of animals from the ratio ofGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. J., Ludlow, M. M., Troughton, J. H. & Blunt, C. G. (1981). Changes in the natural carbon isotope ratios of the hair from steers fed diets of C4, C3 and C4 species in sequence. Search 12, 85–87.Google Scholar
Ludlow, M. M., Troughton, J. H. & Jones, R. J. (1976). A technique for determining the proportion of C3 and C4 species in plant samples using stable natural isotopes of carbon. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 87, 625–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDougall, E. I. (1948). Studies on ruminant saliva. Journal of Biochemistry 43, 99–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, E. J. (1964). Regression Analysis. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar