Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:05:22.416Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Willingness-to-Pay for Calf Health Programs and Certification Agents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

Tucker Schumacher ,
Ted C. Schroeder  and
Glynn T. Tonsor
Tucker Schumacher
Affiliation:
Global Animal Management, Inc., St. Louis Park, MN
Ted C. Schroeder
Affiliation:
Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
Glynn T. Tonsor
Affiliation:
Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cattle feeders want feeder cattle that have been weaned and preconditioned with a certified health program. Preconditioned calves perform more efficiently in the feedlot with lower morbidity and mortality. Health program claims, however, range from no claim to being USDA-certified. The value of health protocol certification may vary with certifying entity. Results from a choice experiment and survey of cattle feeders indicate preconditioning programs that include weaning, vaccinating against respiratory and clostridial/blackleg, and treating for parasites are worth on average $7.28/cwt to feedlots. Furthermore, a health program certified by USDA carries an additional value of $2.37/cwt on average.

Keywords

calf health programscalf preconditioningvalue of certificationQ13L15D82
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , May 2012 , pp. 191 - 202
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akerlof, G.A. “The Market for ‘Lemons’: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism”. Quarterly Journal of Economics 84,3(August 1970): 488–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alfnes, F. “Stated Preferences for Imported and Hormone-Treated Beef: Application of a Mixed Logit Model”. European Review of Agricultural Economics 31(2004): 19–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, D.W. “Pot-Bellies, Cattle Breeds and Revealing Signals”. Economic Inquiry 31,3(July 1993):481-87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avent, R.K., Ward, C.E., and Lalman, D.L.. “Market Valuation of Preconditioning Feeder Calves”. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 36,1(August 2004):173-83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blank, S.C., Forero, L.C., and Nader, G.A.. “Video Market Data for Calves and Yearlings Confirms Discounts for Western Cattle”. California Agriculture 63,4(October-November 2009):225-31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulut, H., and Lawrence, J.D.. “The Value of Third-Party Certification of Preconditioning Claims at Iowa Feeder Cattle Auctions”. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 39,3(December 2006):625-40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chymis, A.G., James, H.S. Jr., Kondura, S., Pierce, V.L, and Larson, R.L.. “Asymmetric Information in Cattle Auctions: The Problem of Revaccinations”. Agricultural Economics 36(2007):79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, C.G., and Gillespie, J.M.. “Factors Affecting the Selection of Business Arrangements by U.S. Hog Farmers”. Review of Agricultural Economics 29(2007):331-48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhuyvetter, K.C., Bryant, A.M., Blasi, D.A.. “Case Study: Preconditioning Beef Calves: Are Expected Premiums Sufficient to Justify the Practice?” Professional Animal Scientist 21(2005): 502-14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, B.A., Dolezal, H.G., Bryant, L.K., Owens, F.N., and Smith, R.A.. “Health of Finishing Steers: Effects on Performance, Carcass Traits, and Meat Tenderness”. Journal of Animal Science 77(1999):3168-75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greene, W.NLOGIT Version 4.0 Reference Guide. Econometric Software, Inc., 2008.Google Scholar
Hanemann, W.M. “Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66(1984):332-41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hensher, D.A., Rose, J.M., and Greene, W.H.. Applied Choice Analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Hodur, N.M., Leistritz, F.L., Nudell, D.J., Clark, C., Griffith, D., and Jensen, T.. “Northern Great Plains Beef Production: Production and Marketing Practices of Cow-Calf Producers.” Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics Report No. 609, North Dakota State University. August 2007.Google Scholar
Irsik, M. “Receiving and Treating Feedlot Cattle.” University of Florida Extension, 2005. Available at: http://www.animal.ufl.edu/ANS4245C/documents/FeedlotHealth.pdf (Accessed July 15, 2011).Google Scholar
King, M.E., Salman, M.D., Wittum, T.E., Odde, K.G., Seeger, J.T., Grotelueschen, D.M., Rogers, G.M., and Quakenbush, G.A.. “Effect of Certified Health Programs on the Sale Price of Beef Calves Marketed Through a Livestock Videotape Auction Service from 1995 through 2005.” Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 229(2006): 1389-400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krinsky, I., and Robb, A. “On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities”. Review of Economics and Statistics 64(1986):715-19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhfeld, W.F., Tobias, R.D., and Garratt, M.. “Efficient Experimental Design with Marketing Research Applications”. Journal of Marketing Research 31(1994):545-57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladd, G.W., and Martin, M.B.. “Prices and Demand for Input Characteristics”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 58,1 (February 1976):21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louviere, J.J., Islam, T., Wasi, N., Street, D., and Burgess, L.. “Designing Discrete Choice Experiments: Do Optimal Designs Come at a Price?” Journal of Consumer Research 35(2008):360-75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lusk, J., Roosen, J., and Fox, J.. “Demand for Beef from Cattle Administered Growth Hormones or Fed Genetically Modified Corn: A Comparison of Consumers in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85(2003): 16–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norwood, F.B., Winn, C., Chung, C., and Ward, C.E.. “Designing a Voluntary Beef Checkoff”. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 31(2006):74–92.Google Scholar
Olynk, N.J., Tonsor, G.T., and Wolf, C.A.. “Consumer Willingness to Pay for Livestock Credence Attribute Claim Verification”. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 35(2010a): 261-80.Google Scholar
Olynk, N.J., Tonsor, G.T., and Wolf, C.A.. “Verifying Credence Attributes in Livestock Production”. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 42(2010b):439-52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, K.F., Schroeder, T.C., Langemeier, M.R., and Herbei, K.L.. “Cow-Calf Producer Risk Preference Impacts on Retained Ownership Strategies”. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 43,4(November 2011):497–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhardt, CD., Busby, W.D., and Corah, L.R.. “Relationship of Various Incoming Cattle Traits with Feedlot Performance and Carcass Traits”. Journal of Animal Science 87(2009): 3030-42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Revelt, D., and Train, K.. “Mixed Logit with Repeated Choices: Households' Choices of Appliance Efficiency Level”. Review of Economics and Statistics 80(1998):647-57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, B., Sporleder, T.L., and Belleville, B.. “Hog Producer Preferences for Marketing Contract Attributes”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86(2004): 115-23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruto, E., Garrod, G., and Scarpa, R.. “Valuing Animal Genetic Resources: A Choice Modeling Application to Indigenous Cattle in Kenya”. Agricultural Economics 38(2008):89–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarpa, R., and DelGiudice, T.. “Market Segmentation via Mixed Logit: Extra Virgin Olive Oil in Urban Italy”. Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization 2,7(2004): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, T.C., and Kovanda, J.. “Beef Alliances: Motivations, Extent, and Future Prospects”. The Veterinary Clinics of North America Food Animal Practice 19(2003):397–4l7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schroeder, T.C., and Tonsor, G.T.. “International Cattle ID and Traceability: Competitive Implications for the United States”. Food Policy 37,1(February 2012):31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulz, L., and Tonsor, G.T.. “Cow-Calf Producer Perceptions Regarding Individual Animal Traceability”. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 42(2010):659-77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spotterpublications. 2011. BeefSpotter 2011. Available at: www.spotterpublications.com/bs.htm (Accessed October 10, 2011).Google Scholar
Step, D.L., Krehbiel, C.R., DePra, H.A., Cranston, J.J., Fulton, R.W., Kirkpatrick, J.G., Gill, D.R., Payton, M.E., Montelongo, M.A., and Confer, A.W.. “Effects of Commingling Beef Calves from Different Sources and Weaning Protocols during a Forty-Two-Day Receiving Period on Performance and Bovine Respiratory Disease”. Journal of Animal Science 86(2008):3146-58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tonsor, G.T., Schroeder, T.C., Fox, J.A., and Biere, A.. “European Preferences for Beef Steak Attributes”. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 30(2005):367-80.Google Scholar
Tonsor, G.T., and Shupp, R.. “Cheap Talk Scripts: Effectiveness in Online Choice Experiments and Private Good, Niche Market Assessments”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 93(2011): 1015-31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Train, K.E.Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, S.C., McKissick, J., and Dykes, N.S.. “Reputations Selling in Feeder Cattle Tele-auctions”. Review of Agricultural Economics 15,1(January 1993):9–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service. Livestock Operations Final Estimates 2003-2007. Statistical Bulletin Number 1021. March 2009.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, L.C., Schroeder, T.C., Dhuyvetter, K.C., Olson, K.C., Stokka, G.L., Seeger, J.T., and Grotelueschen, D.M.. “The Effect of Value-Added Management on Calf Prices at Superior Livestock Auction Video Markets”. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 2012, in press.Google Scholar