Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:17:00.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Willingness to Pay for Information Programs about E-Commerce:Results from a Convenience Sample of Rural LouisianaBusinesses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Susan Watson
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Sciences, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA
O. John Nwoha
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness at, the University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR
Gary Kennedy
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Sciences at, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA
Kenneth Rea
Affiliation:
Academic Affairs at, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA

Abstract

The probability of a business paying various amounts of money for ane-commerce presence ultimately depends on demographic features, experienceswith e-commerce from a buyer's and seller's perspective, technologicalexpertise, and knowledge of e-commerce opportunities and limitations.Estimating functions to assign probabilities associated with the willingnessto pay for an e-commerce presence will assist in forecasting regionallikelihood of certain profiles paying various monetary amounts for ane-commerce presence. In addition, if services are provided at no cost by athird party, value to a society will be maximized by selecting profiles withthe highest willingness to pay.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abate, G., and Moser, C.. “E-Commerce and Internet Use in Small Businesses: Trends and Issues.” Working Paper, Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University, January 2003.Google Scholar
Blefari-Melazzi, N., Sorte, D. Di, and Reali, G.. “Accounting and Pricing: A Forecast of the Scenario of the Next Generation Internet.Computer Communications 26,18(2003):2037–51.Google Scholar
Chellappa, R.K., and Shivendu, S.. “Economic Implications of Variable Technology Standards for Movie Piracy in a Global Context.Journal of Management Information Systems 20,2(2003): 137148.Google Scholar
Dillman, D. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method, 2nd ed., New York: Wiley and Sons, Inc., 2000.Google Scholar
Dolan, R.J., and Moon, T.. “Pricing and Market Making on the Internet.” Harvard Business School Case Study No. 9-500-065.Google Scholar
Dutta, S., and Evrard, P.. “Information Technology and Organization Within European Small Enterprises.European Management Journal 17,3(1999):239–51.Google Scholar
eTForecasts. 2003. Internet site: http://www.etforecasts.com/products/ES_intusersv2.htm (Accessed June 2, 2004).Google Scholar
Henderson, J., Akridge, J., and Dooley, F.. “Internet and E-Commerce Adoption by Agricultural Input Firms.Review of Agricultural Economics 26,4(2004):505520.Google Scholar
Henderson, J., Dooley, F., and Akridge, J.. “Adoption of E-Commerce Strategies for Agribusiness Firms.” Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Agricultural Economics Association, Tampa, FL, July 30, 2000.Google Scholar
Jiang, P.Exploring Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Online Customization and It's Marketing Outcomes.Journal of Targeting, Measurement, and Analysis for Marketing 11,2(2002): 168–83.Google Scholar
Kinsey, J.Electronic Technology: New Opportunities and New Demands for Retail Food Stores.Journal of Food Distribution Research 31,1 (March 2000a):5055.Google Scholar
Kinsey, J.A Faster, Leaner, Supply Chain: New Uses of Information Technology.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82,5(November 2000b): 1123.Google Scholar
Lee, H.S., Park, K., and Kim, S.Y.. “Estimation of Information Value on the Internet: Application of Hedonic Price Model.Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 2,1(2003):380.Google Scholar
Leroux, N., Wortman, M., and Mathias, E.. “Dominant Factors Impacting the Development of Business-to-Business (B2B) E-Commerce in Agriculture.International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 4(2001):205–18.Google Scholar
Loomis, J.B.Contingent Valuation Using Dichot-omous Choice Models.Journal of Leisure Research 20,1(1988):4656.Google Scholar
McFarlane, D., Chembezi, D., and Befecadu, J.. “Internet Adoption and Use of E-Commerce Strategies by Agribusiness Firms in Alabama.” Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Southern Agricultural Economics Association, Mobile, AL, February 1-5, 2003.Google Scholar
Moss, L.A.Who Wins and Loses and How Will E-Markets Affect Rural America?” Paper presented at the USDA Outlook Forum, Washington, DC, February 22-23, 2001.Google Scholar
Motiwall, L.F., and Khan, M.R.. “Financial Impact of E-Business Initiatives in the Retail Industry.” Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations 1,1(2003):5573.Google Scholar
Mueller, R.A.E.E-commerce and Entrepreneur-ship in Agricultural Markets.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83,5(2001): 1243–49.Google Scholar
Neilsen—Net Ratings. Internet site: http://www. Neilsen-NetRatings.com (Accessed: June 2, 2004).Google Scholar
Paper, D., Pedersen, E., and Mulbery, K.. “An E-Commerce Process Model: Perspectives from E-Commerce Entrepreneurs.Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations 1,3(2003): 2847.Google Scholar
Pindyck, R.S., and Rubinfeld, D.L.. Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts, 4th ed. Boston: Irwin-McGraw-Hill Co., 1998.Google Scholar
Poone, S., and Swatman, P.. “An Exploratory Study of Small Business Internet Commerce Issues.Information and Management 35,1(1999):918.Google Scholar
Post, G., Kagan, A., Burkink, T.J., and Schmitz, T.G.. “Analyzing Consumers' Preferences on Commercial Website Attributes.Quarterly Journal of Electronic Commerce 3,2(2002): 111–23.Google Scholar
Salin, V.Information Technology in Agri-Food Supply Chains.” International Food and Agribusiness Management Review: Official journal of the International Food and Agribusiness Management Association 1,3(1998):329–34.Google Scholar
Shazam Econometric Software, Professional Edition, Version 9. Logit Estimation Results. Internet site: http://shazam.econ.ubc.ca/intro/logitl.htm (Accessed: June 24, 2004).Google Scholar
Small Business Administration (SBA). 1999. Rural and Urban Areas by Firm Size. Internet site: http://www.sba.gov/advo/stats/urb_rur.pdf (Accessed January, 2005).Google Scholar
Sultan, E.Consumer Response to the Internet: An Exploratory Tracking Study of On-line Home Users.Journal of Business Research 55,8(2002):655–63.Google Scholar
Suri, R., Manchanda, R., Monroe, K.B., and Srinivasan, S.S.The Impact of Computer Anxiety on the Evaluation of Prices on the Internet.Advances in Consumer Research 29,1(2002):254–61.Google Scholar
United States Department of Commerce. Estimated Quarterly U.S. Retail E-Commerce Sales: Fourth Quarter 1999-First Quarter 2004. Internet site: http://www.census.gov/mrts/www/current.html (Accessed: June 2, 2004).Google Scholar
Webb, B., and Sayer, R.Benchmarking Small Companies on the Internet.Long Range Planning 31,6(1998):815–27.Google Scholar