Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T05:30:15.304Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Welfare Reform Bill and its Effects in the South

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Gerald B. White
Affiliation:
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Burl F. Long
Affiliation:
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Extract

“The majority of Americans now living in comfortable circumstances should become better off, not worse off, as a result of such a (redistribution) policy. To get this dynamic thought understood and widely accepted is the major task for all who would enlighten public opinion in America”.

The number of Americans living in poverty increased by an estimated 1.2 million during 1969 and 1970, reversing the downward trend in numbers of poor registered through the 1960's. It seems a paradox that 12 percent of our citizens live in poverty in a trillion dollar economy. The grossly unequal distribution of income is illustrated by the fact that average annual after-tax personal income was $3,098 per person in 1970. Yet, 25 million lived below the 1970 poverty level, defined as $3,944 for a family of four. Roughly speaking, those living in poverty existed on incomes of less than one-third of the national per capita level. This paper is not concerned with the highly skewed distribution of personal income, but is directed to the effects on those living below or near the officially defined poverty level.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Refferences

[1]Armstrong, Richard, “The Looming Money Revolution Down South,” Fortune, June 1970, p. 66.Google Scholar
[2]Beardwood, Richard, “The Southern Roots of Urban Crisis,Fortune, Aug. 1968, p. 84.Google Scholar
[3]Break, G. F., Intergovernment Fiscal Relations in the United States, The Brookings Institution, 1968, p. 257.Google Scholar
[4]Coffey, J., “Rural Manpowers: Program Needs, Payoffs, Delivery and Directions,” 1971 Agricultural Outlook Conference, Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
[5]Committee Print, H.R. 16311, The Family Assistance Act of 1970, June Revision, (Nov. 5, 1970), P.A17.Google Scholar
[6]Edstrom, Eve and Kotz, Nick, “Mills Offers New Welfare Bill, Receives Bipartisan Praise,” The Washington Post, May 13, 1971, pp. 1 and 10.Google Scholar
[7]Elesh, David, et al., The New Jersey-Pennsylvania Experiment: A Fold Study in Negative Taxation, Institute for Research on Poverty, Discussion Paper 65-70, Feb. 1970, p. 17.Google Scholar
[8]Family Income Maintenance: Some Options, Southern Extension Public Affairs Committee, Texas A&M University, May 1970, p. 5.Google Scholar
[9]Marshall, J. P., “Income Maintenance: Welfare, People, and Governments,” Virginia Agricultural Economics Journal, July-Sept. 1970, p. 15.Google Scholar
[10]Myrdal, Gunnar, Challenge to Affluence, Vintage Books, Alfred A. Knopf, Inc., and Random House, Inc., 1965, pp. 57, 58.Google Scholar
[11] Press Release, Summary of Provisions of H.R. 1, “The Social Security Amendments of 1971,” as amended, May 12, 1971, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C, 1971, p. 19.Google Scholar
[12] Social Security Amendments of 1971, Report of the Committee on Ways and Means on H.R. 1, U. S. Government Printing Office, 1971, p. 174.Google Scholar
[13]The People Left Behind, A Report by the President's National Advisory Commission on Rural Poverty, Sept. 1967, pp. 4, 5.Google Scholar
[14]The Walll Street Journal, “Low Paid Workers Get Better Jobs Due to Guaranteed Income, OEO Study Finds,” p. 7.Google Scholar
[15]The Wall Street Journal, “Ranks of U. S. Poor Grew in 1969-70, Census Shows,” May 10, 1971, p. 7.Google Scholar
[16]Weaver, W. J. Jr., “Nixon Aide Voices Hope on Welfare,” New York Times, May 14, 1971, p. 50.Google Scholar
[17]Welfare: Trying to End the Nightmare,” Time, Feb. 8, 1971, p. 17.Google Scholar