No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Transportation Alternatives in Rural Communities: A Feasibility Analysis
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 April 2015
Extract
Transportation is a vital element in our daily lives. Access to jobs, shopping, and other services depends upon some form of transportation. The principal means of transportation in the United States continues to be the automobile. Census figures show that in 1975, 84.7 percent of all workers in this country and 84.5 percent of the workers in non-metropolitan areas used the automobile to get to work (U.S. Bureau of the Census).
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1981
References
Bureau of Economic Analysis. “Current Business Statistics,” Survey of Current Business 60(1980).Google Scholar
Hallberg, M. C. and Kriebel, W. R.Designing Efficient Pickup and Delivery Route Systems by Computer. Pennsylvania State University, Bull. 782, June 1972.Google Scholar
Margolin, Joseph B. and Misch, Marion Ruth. “Incentives and Disincentives for Ridesharing: A Behavioral Study.” Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, August 1978.Google Scholar
Tweeten, Luther and Brinkman, George L.Micropolitan Development: Theory and Practice of Greater Rural Economic Development. Ames: The Iowa State University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census. “The Journey to Work in the United States: 1975.” Current Population Reports, Special Studies P-23, No. 99, July 1979.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Transportation. “Cost of Owning and Operating an Automobile.” Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C. Issues for 1968, 1970, 1972, 1974, 1976, 1979.Google Scholar
Webb, Shwu-Eng, Doeksen, Gerald A., and Carroll, Robert. “A Community Development Guide for a Transportation System for the Elderly.” Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Preliminary Report AE-8024, February 1980.Google Scholar