Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T04:31:19.132Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Simulating the Performance of a Multiple Exchange Mechanism Market

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Richard L. Kilmer  and
Ronald W. Ward
Richard L. Kilmer
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Ronald W. Ward
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The impact of a monopolist or monopsonist on the price and output performance in comparison with perfectly competitive markets is well documented. These markets are coordinated through spot market exchanges.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , December 1982 , pp. 17 - 21
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arrow, K. J. “Vertical Integration and Communication.” Bell J. Econ. 6(1975):173–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buccola, S. T. and French, B. C.. “Long-Term Marketing Contracts: Intra-Firm Optima and Inter-Firm Agreements.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 61(1979):648–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Logan, Samuel H. “A Conceptual Framework for Analyzing Economics of Vertical Integration.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 51(1969):834–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, Martin K. “Vertical Integration: The Monopoly Case.” Amer. Econ. Rev. 68(1978):561–570.Google Scholar
Stigler, George J. “The Division of Labor is Limited by the Extent of the Market.” J. Pol. Econ. 59(1951):185–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E. “Market and Hierarchies: Some Elementary Considerations.” Amer. Econ. Rev. 63(1973):316–325.Google Scholar