Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T00:29:02.984Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Semiparametric Approach to Analyzing Differentiated Agricultural Products

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

Anton Bekkerman ,
Gary W. Brester  and
Tyrel J. McDonald
Anton Bekkerman
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana
Gary W. Brester
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Economics, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana
Tyrel J. McDonald
Affiliation:
Verified Beef, LLC, Bozeman, Montana
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

When consumers have heterogeneous perceptions about product quality, traditional parametric methods may not provide accurate marginal valuation estimates of a product's characteristics. A quantile regression framework can be used to estimate valuations of product characteristics when quality perceptions are not homogeneous. Semiparametric quantile regressions provide identification and quantification of heterogeneous marginal valuation effects across a conditional price distribution. Using purchase price data from a bull auction, we show that there are nonconstant marginal valuations of bull carcass and growth traits. Improved understanding of product characteristic valuations across differentiated market segments can help producers develop more cost-effective management strategies.

Keywords

bull salesheritable traitsproduct differentiationquantile regressionQ13L15C52D49
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , February 2013 , pp. 79 - 94
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arias, O., Hallock, K.F., and Sosa-Escudero, W.. “Individual Heterogeneity in the Returns to Schooling: Instrumental Variables Quantile Regression Using Twins Data.” Empirical Economics 26(2001):7–40.10.1007/s001810000053Google Scholar
Barnes, M.L., and Hughes, A.W.. “A Quantile Regression Analysis of the Cross Section of Stock Market Returns.” Working paper, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, 2002.Google Scholar
Brester, G. “Meeting Consumer Demands with Genetics and Market Coordination: The Case of the Leachman Cattle Company.” Review of Agricultural Economics 24(2002):251–65.10.1111/1467-9353.00095Google Scholar
Buchinsky, M. “The Dynamics of Changes in the Female Wage Distribution in the USA: A Quantile Regression Approach.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 13(1997):1–30.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, G. “Quantile Regression, Censoring and the Structure of Wages.” Advanced in Econometrics. Sims, C., ed. New York, NY: Elsevier, 1994.Google Scholar
Chvosta, J., Rucker, R., and Watts, M.. “Transaction Cost and Cattle Marketing: The Information Content of Seller-provided Presale Data at Bull Auctions.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83(2001):286–301.10.1111/0002-9092.00156Google Scholar
Dhuyvetter, K., Schroeder, T., Simms, D., Bolze, R., and Geske, J.. “Determinants of Purebred Beef Bull Price Differentials.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 21(1996):396–410.Google Scholar
Dickson, P., and Ginter, J.. “Market Segmentation, Product Differentiation, and Marketing Strategy.” Journal of Marketing 51(1987):1–10.Google Scholar
Eide, E., and Showalter, M.. “The Effect of School Quality on Student Performance: A Quantile Regression Approach.” Economics Letters 58(1998):345–50.10.1016/S0165-1765(97)00286-3Google Scholar
Fitzenberger, B., Koenker, R., and Machado, J.. Economic Applications of Quantile Regression. New York, NY: Springer, 2002.Google Scholar
Hao, L., and Naiman, D.. Quantile Regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2007.Google Scholar
Hausman, J., and Wise, D.. “Social Experimentation, Truncated Distributions, and Efficient Estimation.” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 45(1977):319–39.Google Scholar
He, X., and Hu, F.. “Markov Chain Marginal Bootstrap.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 97(2002):783–95.10.1198/016214502388618591Google Scholar
Heckman, J. “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error.” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 47(1979):153–61.10.2307/1912352Google Scholar
Huber, P. “Robust Regression: Asymptotics, Conjectures and Monte Carlo.” Annals of Statistics 1(1973):799–821.10.1214/aos/1176342503Google Scholar
Huber, P. Robust Statistics. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 1981.Google Scholar
Jones, R.D., Turner, T., Dhuyvetter, K.C., and Marsh, T.L.. “Estimating the Economic Value of Specific Characteristics Associated with Angus Bulls Sold at Auction.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 40(2008):315–33.Google Scholar
Koch, R., Swiger, L., Chambers, D., and Gregory, K.. “Efficiency of Feed Use in Beef Cattle.” Journal of Animal Science 22(1963):486–94.Google Scholar
Koenker, R. Quantile Regression. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Koenker, R., and Bassett, G.. “Regression Quan-tiles.” Econometrica 46(1978):33–49.10.2307/1913643Google Scholar
Koenker, R., and Machado, A.. “Goodness of Fit and Related Processes for Quantile Regression.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 94(1999):1296–310.10.1080/01621459.1999.10473882Google Scholar
Ladd, G., and Martin, M.. “Prices and Demands for Input Characteristics.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 58(1976):21–30.10.2307/1238573Google Scholar
Levin, J. “For Whom the Reductions Count: A Quantile Regression Analysis of Class Size on Scholastic Achievement.” Empirical Economics 26(2001):221–46.10.1007/s001810000054Google Scholar
Parceli, J.L., and Schroeder, T.C.. “Hedonic Retail Beef and Pork Product Prices.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 39(2007):29–46.Google Scholar
Rosen, S. “Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition.” The Journal of Political Economy 82(1974):34–55.10.1086/260169Google Scholar
Schroeder, T.C Espinosa, J.A., and Goodwin, B.K.. “The Value of Genetic Traits in Purebred Dairy Bull Services.” Review of Agricultural Economics 14(1992):215–26.10.2307/1349501Google Scholar
Vanek, J., Watts, M., and Brester, G.. “Carcass Quality and Genetic Selection in the Beef Industry.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 33(2008):349–63.Google Scholar
Walburger, A.M. “Estimating the Implicit Prices of Beef Cattle Attributes: A Case from Alberta.” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 50(2002):135–49.10.1111/j.1744-7976.2002.tb00424.xGoogle Scholar
Yohai, V. “High Breakdown Point and High Efficiency Robust Estimates for Regression.” Annals of Statistics 15(1987):642–56.10.1214/aos/1176350366Google Scholar