Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T01:00:29.214Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

School Choice In Rural Georgia: An Empirical Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Andrew Keeler  and
Warren Kriesel
Andrew Keeler
Affiliation:
Agricultural and Applied Economics Department, University of Georgia, Athens, GA
Warren Kriesel
Affiliation:
Agricultural and Applied Economics Department, University of Georgia, Athens, GA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Previous empirical studies of school choice have been at the national level, or have focussed on northeastern states. We estimate the demand for private education in rural Georgia, using proportion of private school attendance as an indicator variable. We find that income, tuition, race and school quality are important choice determinants. The results provide useful information for rural school administrators, and suggest that a tuition tax credit would have to be substantial to cause a significant exodus from public schools.

Keywords

school choiceeducational financerural areastuition tax credits
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , December 1994 , pp. 526 - 534
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, J. and Binstein, M.. “Jersey City: Lab for School Choice.” Washington Post, September 26, 1993.Google Scholar
Asimov, N. “How Vouchers Work in Milwaukee.” San Francisco Chronicle September 27, 1993.Google Scholar
Banks, S. “School Voucher Initiative in California Narrowly Trails, 45% - 39%.” Los Angeles Times, September 16, 1993.Google Scholar
Bingham, J. “1/2 Tuition for Low-Income Families.” Denver Post, June 2, 1993.Google Scholar
Darling-Hammond, L.Kirby, S, and Schlegel, P.Tuition Tax Deductions and Parent School Choice: A Case Study of Minnesota. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp, 1985.Google Scholar
Flowers, M. “Tuition Tax Credits and the Public Schools.” Nat. Tax J. 41(1988): 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, W. “Reviewing Economies of Size in Education.” J. Ed. Fin. 26(1981): 273–296.Google Scholar
Frey, D.Tuition Tax Credits for Private Education. Ames: Iowa State-University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Frey, D. “Tuition Tax Credits for Private Education.” Pub. Fin. Quart. 19(1991): 347–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, W.Econometric Analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan, 1993.Google Scholar
Hamilton, B. and Macauley, M. “Determinants and Consequences of the Private-Public School Choice.” J. Urban Econ. 29(1991): 282–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lankford, H. and Wyckoff, J. “Primary and Secondary School Choice Among Public and Religious Alternatives.” Econ. Ed. Rev. 11(1992): 317–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leff, L. “Schaefer Wins Round in School Vouchers.” Washington Post, February 6, 1993.Google Scholar
Martinello, F. and West, E. “Education Budget Reductions via Tax Credits: Some Further Considerations.” Pub. Fin. Quart. 19(1991): 355–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monk, D.Educational Finance: An Economic Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1990.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J. “The Demand for Education in Public and Private School Systems,” J. Pub. Econ. 3(1974): 349–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wall Street Journal. “Choice Goes National” (editorial). October 7, 1993.Google Scholar
West, E. and Palsson, H. “Parental Choice of School Characteristics: Estimation Using State-Wide Data.” Econ. Inquiry. 26(1988): 725–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar