Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T08:40:27.328Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Role of Market Price-Weight Relationships in Optimal Beef Cattle Backgrounding Programs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Steven T. Buccola ,
Ernest Bentley  and
Warren B. Jessee
Steven T. Buccola
Affiliation:
Agricultural Economics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Ernest Bentley
Affiliation:
Agricultural Economics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Warren B. Jessee
Affiliation:
Maryland-Virginia Milk Producers, Inc., Arlington, Virginia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Approaches to the formulation of optimal beef cattle management programs have changed significantly since they were first examined in a linear programming context in the 1950s. Models were originally designed to identify feed rations which minimize the cost of providing minimum levels of energy and selected nutrients. Subsequent efforts sought to maximize overall farm or feedlot profits, including identification of optimal feeding weights, daily gains, and ration formulations (Kearl, Harris, and Fonnesbeck; Ladd and Williams). The studies varied in attention to such details as number of head fed, variety of alternative feeds, seasonality factors, animal characteristics, and the manner in which energy requirements and appetite are modeled Wilson, and others cast the California net.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , July 1980 , pp. 65 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brokken, R. F., Hammonds, T. M., Dinius, D. A., and Valpey, J.. “Framework for Economie Analysis of Grain Versus Harvested Roughage for Feedlot Cattle.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 58(1976): 245–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, D. E. “Computerized Ration Formulation and Gain Simulation for Profit Maximization in Beef Feedlots,” in Feed Composition Animal Nutrient Requirements, and Computerization of Diets, Fonnesbeck et al., eds. Utah Agr. Exp. Sta., Logan, 1976.Google Scholar
Fox, D. G. and Black, J. R.. “Determining Daily Dry Matter Intakes of Growing and Finishing Cattle.” Michigan Beef Production, Ext. Bull. E-991, Michigan State University Coop. Ext. Ser., 1976.Google Scholar
Harrison, V. L.Optimizing Marketing Dates for Steers by Accounting for Individual Differences. Agr. Econ. Rep. No. 372, ERS, USDA, 1977.Google Scholar
Jessee, W. B. and Buccola, S. T.. A Profit-Maximum Management Model for Beef Cattle Backgrounding and Grazing Operations. Res. Div. Bull. 154, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1979.Google Scholar
Kearl, L. C., Harris, L. E., and Fonnesbeck, P. V.. “Models for Maximizing Profit Through Diet Formulation,” in Feed Composition, Animal Nutrient Requirements, and Computerization of Diets, Fonnesbeck et al., eds. Utah Agr. Exp. Sta., Logan, 1976.Google Scholar
Ladd, G. W. and Williams, J. E.. “Application of Net Energy System and Bayesian Decision Theory for Determination of Cattle Rations and Rates of Gain.” J. An. Sci. 45(1977):1222–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council. Nutrient Requirements of Domestic Animals, No. 4 (Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle). Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences, 1970.Google Scholar
Nino, E. J. A. and Hughes, H. G.. “Formulating Least-Cost Ad-Libitum Rations for Growing Beef Cattle,” in Feed Composition, Animal Nutrient Requirements, and Computerization of Diets, Fonnesbeck et al., eds. Utah Agr. Exp. Sta., Logan, 1976.Google Scholar
Walker, O. L., and Anderson, K. B.. A Dry Matter Quality Approach to Planning Forage-Beef Systems. Agr. Econ. Pap. A. E. 7607, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater (undated).Google Scholar
Wilson, E. M. “Implications of Short-Run Rising Average Productivity in Cattle Feeding.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 58(1976):305–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar