Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T22:15:40.753Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Risk Preferences and Contracting In the U.S. Hog Industry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

C. Scott Johnson  and
Kenneth A. Foster
C. Scott Johnson
Affiliation:
Capital Agricultural Property Services, Inc. Champaign, IL
Kenneth A. Foster
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Much of the increase use of vertical coordination in the U.S. swine industry has taken place through contract production. While the incidence of contracting is much higher in non-traditional hog production areas, a growing number of Midwestern producers are being faced with contract options. A variety of contractual arrangements are available through feed companies, integrators, genetics firms, and packers. However, little is known about the profitability and risk characteristics of these alternatives. This research suggests that risk neutral producers in the Midwest would prefer independent production, and risk averse producers would prefer to choose among the various types of coordination arrangements.

Keywords

RiskStochastic Dominancecontract productionswine
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , December 1994 , pp. 393 - 405
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Jock R. “Risk Efficiency in the Interpretation of Agricultural Production Research.” Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics. 42(1974) 131–184.Google Scholar
Anderson, Jock R., Dillon, John L., and Brian Hardaker, J.. Agricultural Decision Analysis. Iowa State University Press, Ames Iowa. 1977.Google Scholar
Barry, Peter J.Risk Management in Agriculture. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa. (1984).Google Scholar
Coase, R. “The Nature of the Firm.” Econometrica. 4(1937):386–407.Google Scholar
Cochran, Mark J. and Raskin, Rob. “A User's Guide to the Generalized Stochastic Dominance Program for the IBM PC Version GSD 2.1.” University of Arkansas Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology Staff Paper SP0688. April, 1988.Google Scholar
Dillon, John L.The Analysis of Response in Crop and Livestock Production. 2nd ed. Pergamon Press, Oxford, U.K. 1977.Google Scholar
Dornbush, Calvin W. and Boehlje, Michael. “An Economic Analysis of Contracting Arrangements Used by the Minnesota Turkey Industry.” University of Minnesota Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Staff Paper P88-17. June, 1988.Google Scholar
Goh, Siew, Chao-Chuyan Shih, MarkCochran, J. and Raskin, Rob. “A Generalized Stochastic Dominance Program for the IBM PC.” S. J. Agr. Econ. 21 (1989): 175–182.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Neil and Andrews, Greg. “State Regulation of Contract Feeding and Packer Integration in the Swine Industry.” White Paper 92-4, Agricultural Law Center, Drake University Law School, November 1992.Google Scholar
Hardaker, J. B. and Tanago, A. G.. “Assessment of the Output of a Stochastic Decision Model.” Aust. J. Agr. Econ. 17(1973): 170–178.Google Scholar
Jekanowski, Mark. “Value Based Marketing of Pork - An Evaluation of Current and Potential Systems.” M.S. Thesis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, May 1993.Google Scholar
Kauffman, R. G., Drachenberg, E., Hermel, T., Hall, D., and Keough, W.. “Do Pork Packers Pay for Leanness?” Unpublished Report. University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI (1988).Google Scholar
Klemme, Richard M. “A Stochastic Dominance Comparison of Reduced Tillage Systems in Corn and Soybean Production Under Risk.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 67(1985):550–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kliebenstein, James and Hillburn, Chris. “Evaluation of Pork Production Contracts.” Iowa State University Department of Economics.Google Scholar
Kramer, Randall A. and Pope, Rulon D.. “Participation in Farm Commodity Programs: A Stochastic Dominance Analysis.” Amer. J. Agri. Econ. 63(1981): 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, John, Brown, Deborah J., and Lovejoy, Stephen. “Stochastic Efficiency versus Mean-Variance Criteria as Predictors of Adoption of Reduced Tillage.” Amer. J. Agi: Econ. 67(1985):839–845.Google Scholar
McCarl, Bruce A. “Generalized Stochastic Dominance: An Empirical Examination.” S. J. Agr. Econ. 22(1990):49–55.Google Scholar
Meyer, Jack. “Choice Among Distributions.” J. Econ. Theory. 14(1977):326–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raskin, Rob and Cochran, Mark J.. “Interpretations and Transformations of Scale for the Arrow Pratt Absolute Risk Aversion Coefficient: Implications for Generalized Stochastic Dominance.” W. J. Agr. Econ. 11(1986):204–210.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, S. “The Use of a Multi-Period LP-Model as the Core of a Decision Support System for a Hog Slaughterhouse,” Social Science Series Paper 3 from the Department of Economics and Natural Resources, Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Denmark, 1992.Google Scholar
Rhodes, V. James. “U.S. Contract Production of Hogs.” Univ. Missouri Agr. Econ. Report No: 1990-1. University of Missouri Agricultural Experiment Station, National Pork Producer's Council, and Pork 89. 1989.Google Scholar
Rubin, P. “The Theory of the Firm and the Structure of the Franchise Contract.” J Law and Econ. 21(1977):223–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapp, S. and Knipe, C.L.. “Japanese Consumer Preferences for Processed Pork.” Agribusiness, 6(1990):387–400.3.0.CO;2-W>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schräder, L. “Responses to Forces Shaping Agricultural Marketing: Contracts.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 68(1986):161–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ueda, Y. “Satisfying Our Biggest Pork Customer,” Pork Strategies 2000: A Marketing and Technology Dynamics Symposium for Pork Industiy Leaders, Des Moines, Iowa, December 1990.Google Scholar
Williams, Jeffrey R. “A Stochastic Dominance Analysis of Tillage and Crop Insurance Practices in a Semiarid Region.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 70(1988):! 12–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E. “The Vertical Integration of Production: Market Failure Considerations.” Amer. Econ. Rev. 61 (1971): 112–123.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E. “Transaction Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations.” J. Law and Econ. 22(1979):233–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Paul N. and Eidman, Vernon R.. “An Empirical Test of the Interval Approach for Estimating Risk Preferences.” W. J. Agr. Econ. 8( 1983): 170–182.Google Scholar
Kelley, Zering, and Beals, Allen. “Financial Characteristics of Swine Production Contracts.” J. Amer. Soc. Farm Managers and Rur. Appraisers. 54(1990):43–53.Google Scholar