Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:27:29.218Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reduced Risk Rotations for Fresh Vegetable Crops: An Analysis for the Sand Mountain and Tennessee Valley Regions of Alabama

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

Michael E. Zwingli ,
William E. Hardy Jr.  and
John L. Adrian Jr.
Michael E. Zwingli
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Auburn University
William E. Hardy Jr.
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Auburn University
John L. Adrian Jr.
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Auburn University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A mixed integer linear programming model was developed to simulate the decision environment faced by an entry-level vegetable producer contemplating production for the whole-sale market. The model included activities which permitted consideration of 13 vegetable crops within a spring, summer, and fall rotational system. Rotations were permitted within given bounds established by marketing, rotational, and price risk constraints. Rotations were generally stable with respect to markets and relative to crop mixes as target income and acceptable negative deviation levels were varied. Spring and fall broccoli and turnip greens and late spring-summer yellow and zucchini squash were dominant crops in the triple crop rotations in the Atlanta and Cincinnati markets.

Keywords

vegetablesriskmulti-cropping systemsMOTADmarketsfeasibility
Type
Submitted Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , December 1989 , pp. 155 - 165
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Colette, W.A., and Wall, G.B.. “Evaluating Vegetable Production for Market Windows as an Alternative for Limited Farmers.” So. J. Agr. Econ., 10, 2(1978): 189–193.Google Scholar
Musser, W.N., Alexander, V.J., Tew, B.V., and Smittle, D.A.. “A Mathematical Programming Model for Vegetable Rotations.” So. J. Agr. Econ., 17, 1(1985): 169–176.Google Scholar
O'Rourke, D.A.. Market Opportunities for Minor Washington Fruits and Vegetables. Research Bulletin XB 0946; Agricultural Research Center, Washington State University, 1984.Google Scholar
O'Rourke, D.A.. “Use of the Market Window Technique in Evaluating Potential for Interregional Trade.” Proceedings of Analyzing the Potential for Alternative Fruit and Vegetable Crop Production Seminar. Ed. Estes, E.. North Carolina Agr. Res. Ser. and Tenn. Valley Auth., November 1985.Google Scholar
Tauer, L.W.. “Target MOTAD.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 65, 4(1983): 606–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture (a). Agricultural Marketing Service. Atlanta Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Wholesale Market Prices. Washington D.C.; various years.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture (b). Agricultural Marketing Service. Cincinnati Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Wholesale Market Prices. Washington D.C.; various years.Google Scholar
Zwingli, M.E.. “Market Potential for Fresh Vegetables Grown in the Sand Mountain Region of Alabama.” M.S. Thesis, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Auburn University, 1986.Google Scholar
Zwingli, M.E.., Adrian, J.L.., Hardy, W.E., and Free, W.J.. Wholesale Market Potential For Fresh Vegetables Grown in North Alabama. Ala. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bui. 586; Auburn University; July 1987.Google Scholar