Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T13:30:28.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Prospectus for Research on the Agricultural Potential of the South*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Joseph C. Purcell*
Affiliation:
Georgia Experiment Station, Griffin, Georgia

Extract

The South plays an important role in American agriculture in that it is a major supplier of several commodities. However, due to relatively low yields, the region is a marginal producer of some important farm commodities grown in the United States. Given this constraint, the South still offers the greatest potential for expansion of agricultural output of any region in the country. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate this assertion. A rather broad perspective with implications for future research is provided.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This paper was prepared in conjunction with the Southern Region Task Force on Marketing and Competition Research.

References

[1] Blakelee, L. L., Heady, E. O. and Framington, C. F.. World Food Production, Demand and Trade, Ames, Iowa State University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
[2] Brandow, G. E.American Agriculture's Capacity to Meet Future Demands,American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Volume 56, Number 5, pp. 10901101, December 1974.Google Scholar
[3] Brown, J. D. and Elrod, J. C.. “Georgia Peach Producing Industry: An Analysis of Interregional Competition,” Georgia Experiment Stations Research Bulletin 24, December 1967.Google Scholar
[4] Davis, Yvonne and Tutter, Warren. U.S. Peach Industry: Part 2. An Interregional Competitive Model for Canned Peaches, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agricultural Economics Report Number 253. March 1974.Google Scholar
[5] Lui, Charles Y. and West, D. A.. “A Spatial Analysis of Beef Feeding and Slaughtering with Emphasis on the South,” Southern Cooperative Series Bulletin Number 177, 1973.Google Scholar
[6] Mathia, Gene A. et. al. “Economic Analysis for Selected Vegetable Processing in the South,” Economic Information Reports Number 14, 17, 18 and 19, January-June 1970.Google Scholar
[7] Paarlberg, Don. “World Food Situation and World Food System,” Statement before Joint Subcommittee on Foreign Agricultural Policy and the Subcommittee on Agricultural Production, Marketing and Stabilization of Prices, Committee on Agriculture and Forestry, United States Senate (unnumbered), October 1973.Google Scholar
[8] Parvin, D.W. and Purcell, J. C.. “Differential Costs and Returns to Applied Plant Nutrients in the Production of 10 Major Crops in Georgia and Competing Areas,” Georgia Agricultural Experiment Stations Research Report 131, June 1972.Google Scholar
[9] Pryor, Shirley, McDowell, George and Sorenson, Vemon. “Issues in Trade and Development, Outlook and Research Needs for the 1970's,” Seminar Report Number 3, Agricultural Development Council, New York, October 1973.Google Scholar
[10] Purcell, J. C. and Elrod, J. C.. “Relative Changes in Production, Price and Value of Farm Commodities, U.S. 1950 to 1972,” Georgia Agricultural Experiment Stations Research Report 183, January 1974.Google Scholar
[11] Rohdy, D. D.Southeast Hog-Pork Industry: A National Market Competitor,” Southern Cooperative Series Bulletin Number 89, 1964.Google Scholar
[12] Rojko, A. S., Urban, F. S. and Naine, J. J.. World Prospects for Grain in 1980, with Emphasis on Trade for Less Developed Countries, USDA, FAER, 1971.Google Scholar
[13] Schuh, G. Edward. “The Exchange Rate and U.S. Agriculture,American Journal of Agricultural Economics,, Volume 45, Number 1, pp. 113, February 1974.Google Scholar
[14] Southern Region Task Force. “Marketing and Competition Research in the Southern Regions: Problems and Priorities for Agriculture,” (unnumbered), September 1974.Google Scholar
[15] Tweeten, Luther and Quance, Leroy. “Excess Capacity and Adjustment Potential in U.S. Agriculture,Agriculture Economics Research, 25:5766, July 1972.Google Scholar