Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T12:23:39.021Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Productivity Growth in the Florida Fresh Winter Vegetable Industry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

Timothy G. Taylor  and
Gary H. Wilkowske
Timothy G. Taylor
Affiliation:
Food and Resource Economics Department, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida
Gary H. Wilkowske
Affiliation:
Food and Resource Economics Department, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Results indicate that productivity growth has been a prime factor in Florida's ability to retain a competitive position in the United States domestic fresh winter vegetable market. Total factor productivity indexes and productivity growth rates are estimated for the production of four major vegetable crops in one or more of four production areas in Florida. Florida producers have exhibited substantial productivity growth over the 1969-70 to 1981-82 period.

Keywords

vegetableproductionproductivityindex numbers
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , December 1984 , pp. 55 - 62
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bredahl, M. E., Hillman, J. S., Rothenberg, R. A., and Gutierrez, N.. Technical Change, Protectionism and Market Structure: The Case of International Trade in Fresh Winter Vegetables, Technical Bulletin 249, University of Arizona, 1983.Google Scholar
Brooke, D. L. Costs and Returns from Vegetable Crops in Florida with Comparisons, Food and Resource Economics Department, Economic Information Report, University of Florida, various issues.Google Scholar
Caves, D. W., Christensen, L. R., and Diewert, W. E. “Multilateral Comparisons of Output, Input and Productivity Using Superlative Index Numbers.” Econ. J., 92(1982a):73–86.Google Scholar
Caves, D. W., Christensen, L. R., and Diewert, W. E. “The Economic Theory of Index Numbers and the Measurement of Input, Output and Productivity.” Econometrica, 50(1982b):1393–1414.Google Scholar
Caves, D. W., Christensen, L. R., and Swanson, J. A. “Productivity Growth, Scale Economics and Capacity Utilization in U.S. Railroads, 1955-1974.” Amer. Econ. Rev., 71(1981):994–1002.Google Scholar
Christensen, L. R., and Jorgenson, D. W. “The Measurement of U.S. Real Capital Input, 1929-1967.” Rev. of Income and Wealth, 15(1969):293–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, L. R. and Jorgenson, D. W. “U.S. Real Product and Real Factor Input.” Rev. of Income and Wealth, 16(1970):19–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diewert, W. E.“Exact and Superlative Index Numbers.”J. of Econometrics, 4(1976):115–145.Google Scholar
Diewert, W. E.“Aggregation Problems in the Measurement of Capital.” The Measurement of Capital, Ed. Usher, D., Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Divisia, F. L'indice Monetaire Et La Theorie De La Monnaie, Paris: Societe Anonyme du Recueil Sirey, 1926.Google Scholar
Heien, D. M.“Productivity in U.S. Food Processing and Distribution.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 65(1983):297–302.Google Scholar
Jorgenson, D. W. and Griliches, Z.. “The Explanation of Productivity Change.” Rev. of Econ. Studies, 34(1967):249–283.Google Scholar
Kendrick, J. W. Understanding Productivity: An Introduction to the Dynamics of Productivity Change, Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Langham, M. L. and Ahmad, I.. “Measuring Productivity in Economic Growth.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 65(1983):445–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, M. K.“Invariance Axioms and Economic Indexes.” Econometrica, 34(1966:739–755).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solow, R. M.“Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function.” Rev. of Econ. and Stat., 39(1957):312–320.Google Scholar
Taylor, T. G. Costs and Returns from Florida Vegetable Crops, Season 1980-81 with Comparisons, Food and Resource Economics Department, Economic Information Report 159, University of Florida, 1982.Google Scholar
Taylor, T. G. and Wilkowske, G. H. Costs and Returns from Florida Vegetable Crops, Season 1981-82 with Comparisons, Food and Resource Economics Department, Economic Information Report 186, University of Florida, 1983.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Federal-State Market News. Marketing Florida Vegetables, Winter Park, Florida, various issues.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service and Crop Reporting Service, Florida Crop and Livestock Reporting Service. Vegetable Summary, Orlando, Florida, various issues.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Crop Reporting Board and Economics and Statistics Service. Agricultural Prices, Washington, D.C, various issues.Google Scholar
Zepp, G. A. and Simmons, R. L. Producing Fresh Winter Vegetables in Florida and Mexico, Washington, D. C: U.S. Department of Agriculture, ESCS Report 72, November, 1979.Google Scholar