Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:13:15.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Production Response to Increased Imports: The Case of U.S. Sugar

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

P. Lynn Kennedy  and
Andrew Schmitz
P. Lynn Kennedy
Affiliation:
Louisiana State University and LSU AgCenter, Baton Rouge, LA
Andrew Schmitz
Affiliation:
University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper considers how the welfare of U.S. sugar producers can be affected by the use of production controls in the presence of rising sugar imports and falling sugar prices, taking into account the negative externalities associated with U.S. sugar production. Even if production controls are used, producer welfare can be affected negatively under rising imports.

Keywords

import quotaproduction quotasupply managementU.S. sugarF13F14Q17
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , December 2009 , pp. 777 - 789
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Castillo, M.J., Bucaram, S., and Schmitz., A. “Price Relationships in the U.S. Sweetener Market: A Cointegration Approach.” International Sugar Journal 110,1314(2008):358–63.Google Scholar
Gardiner, W.H., Roningen, R.O., and Liu., K. “Elasticities in the Trade Liberalization Database.” Staff Report No. AGEC 89–20. Washington, D.C.: Agriculture and Trade Analysis Division, Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, 1989.Google Scholar
Katz, M., Bruneau, J.F., and Schmitz., A. “Identifying and Applying a Comparative Advantage Framework in Canadian Supply-Managed Agriculture.” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 56,2(2008): 129–44.Google Scholar
Lopez, R.A. “Economic Surpluses in the U.S. Sugar Market.” Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 19,1(1990):28–36.Google Scholar
Lopez, R.A. “Political Economy of U.S. Sugar Policies.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71,1(1989):20–31.Google Scholar
Moss, C.B., and Schmitz., A. “Coalition Structures and U.S. Sugar Policy.” Sugar and Related Sweetener Markets: International Perspectives. Schmitz, A., Spreen, T.H., Messina, W.A., and Moss, C.B., eds., pp. 259–80. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrolia, D.R., and Kennedy., P.L. “Increasing the United States Tariff-Rate Sugar Quota for Cuba and Mexico: A Partial-Equilibrium Simulation.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 35,3(2003):589–97.Google Scholar
Rude, J., and Gervais, J.-P. “Tariff Rate Quota Liberalization: The Case of World Price Uncertainty and Supply Management.” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 54,1(2006): 33–54.Google Scholar
Schmitz, A. “Supply Management in Canadian Agriculture.” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 31,2(1983):135–52.Google Scholar
Schmitz, A. “Canadian Agricultural Programs and Policy in Transition.” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 56,4(2008):371–92.Google Scholar
Schmitz, A., Coffin, G., and Rosaasen, K., eds. Regulation and Protectionism under GATT: Case Studies in North American Agriculture. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Schmitz, T.G., Schmitz, A., and Seale, J.L. Jr. “Brazil's Ethanol Program: The Case of Hidden Sugar Subsidies.” International Sugar Journal 105,1254(2003):254–65.
Tyers, R., and Anderson., K. Disarray in World Food Markets: A Quantitative Assessment. Hong Kong: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Vercammen, J.A., and Schmitz., A. “Supply Management and Import Concession.” The Canadian Journal of Economics. Revue Canadienne d'Economique 25,4(1992):957–71.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture. Sugar and Sweetener Situation and Outlook. USDA/ ERS SSS-250. Washington, D.C.: Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, 2007.Google Scholar
Uri, N.D., and Boyd., R. “Assessing the Impact of the Sugar Programme on the U.S. Economy.” Food Policy 19,5(1999):443–57.Google Scholar