Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T12:37:15.935Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Positive and Negative Externalities in Agricultural Production:The Case of Adena Springs Ranch

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

Charles B. Moss
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
Andrew Schmitz
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida

Extract

Policy analysis is complicated by the myriad of benefits and costs generatedby the use of natural resources. This study develops three benefits thatmust be considered in the granting of a consumptive use permit for waterfiled by Adena Springs Ranch, east of Ocala, Florida. This ranch is hopingto expand into grass-fat beef; but to do so, it needs additional water forirrigation. Specifically, our analysis considers the potential gain from theranch, the potential negative effect on existing permit holders andenvironmental uses of water, and the possible positive value generated bythe increased surface flow for other recreational users in eastern MarionCounty.

Type
Invited Paper Sessions
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Coman, K.Some Unsettled Problems of Irrigation.The American Economic Review 1(1911):119.Google Scholar
Just, R.E., Hueth, D.L., and Schmitz, A.. The Welfare Economics of Public Policy. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2004.Google Scholar
Moss, C.B., and de Bodisco, C.. Projected Water Demand by Agriculture in the Northwest Florida Water Management District. Report to the Northwest Florida Water Management District, Havana, FL, 1998.Google Scholar
Reisner, M. Cadillac Desert: The American West and Its Disappearing Water. Revised Edition. New York, NY: Penguin Books, 1993.Google Scholar
Schmitz, A., and Moss, C.B.. Vertical Integration in Production and Marketing: The Case of Sugar in the United States. International Sugar Journal 103(2001):443-46, 61.Google Scholar
Schmitz, T.G., Moss, C.B., and Schmitz, A.. “Marketing Channels Compete for U.S. Stocker Cattle.Journal of Agribusiness 21(2003):131-48.Google Scholar
Young, R.A. Determining the Economic Value of Water: Concepts and Methods. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, 2005.Google Scholar