Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:14:02.292Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Evaluating Crop Response to Lime in the Tennessee Valley Region

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Harry H. Hall  and
W. Joe Free
Harry H. Hall
Affiliation:
University of Kentucky
W. Joe Free
Affiliation:
Agricultural Resource Development Branch, Tennessee Valley Authority
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Excessive soil acidity has long been recognized as one reason soils become unproductive, and liming to neutralize excess acidity has been practiced at least since the second century B.C. [5, p. 125]. Although liming has become a common practice, some researchers contend that farmers use too little lime [e.g., 5, p. 125].

Although lime is sometimes used to supply calcium or magnesium, it is principally used to neutralize soil acidity [3, p. 178], commonly measured by soil pH. Many agronomists agree that most crops require some lime if pH falls below 5.0 and that most require no lime if pH is 7.0 or higher [17, pp. 221–222]. When legumes supplied nitrogen for other crops in rotation, most lime recommendations were designed to raise soil pH to 6.5 or higher to accommodate the legumes. Now, however, nitrogen requirements for most crops are supplied from fertilizer, and some lime recommendations aim for pH levels somewhat below 6.5, at least for non-legumes such as corn and cotton.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , December 1979 , pp. 75 - 81
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Adams, Fred. Response of Corn to Lime in Field Experiments. Bulletin 391, Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn University, June 1969.Google Scholar
[2]Adams, Fred. “Liming and Fertilization of Ultisols and Oxisols,” pp. 377–394 in Mineral Nutrition of Legumes in Tropical and Subtropical Soils, Andrew, C. S. and Kamprath, E. J., eds., Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Melbourne, Australia, 1978.Google Scholar
[3]Adams, Fred and Pearson, Robert W.. “Crop Response to Lime in the Southern United States and Puerto Rico,” ch. 4 in Soil Acidity and Liming, Pearson, Robert W. and Adams, Fred, eds., American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, 1967.Google Scholar
[4]Anderson, R. L. and Nelson, Larry A.. “A Family of Models Involving Intersecting Straight Lines and Concomitant Experimental Designs Useful in Evaluating Response to Fertilizer Nutrients,” Biometrics, Volume 31, June 1975, pp. 303–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Barber, Stanley A. “Liming Materials and Practices,” ch. 3 in Soil Acidity and Liming, Pearson, Robert W. and Adams, Fred, eds., American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, 1967.Google Scholar
[6]Cochran, William G. and Cox, Gertrude M.. Experimental Designs, 2nd ed., New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1957.Google Scholar
[7]Dillon, John L.The Analysis of Response in Crop and Livestock Production, 2nd ed., New York: Pergamon Press, 1977.Google Scholar
[8]Fuller, Wayne A. “Grafted Polynomials as Approximating Functions,” Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Volume 13, 1969, pp. 35–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Hall, Harry H.Crop Response to Lime: A Statistical-Economic Evaluation, to be published as a TVA bulletin.Google Scholar
[10]Moschler, W. W.et al. Lime Effects on Soil Reaction and Base Content of Eleven Soil Types in Virginia, Virginia Polytechnic Institute Technical Bulletin 159, December 1962.Google Scholar
[11] National Limestone Institute, Inc., Washington, D. C, private correspondence from Robert M. Koch, Sr., President.Google Scholar
[12]Snedecor, George W. and Cochran, William G.. Statistical Methods, 6th ed., Ames: Iowa State University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
[13]Suits, Daniel B., Mason, Andrew, and Chan, Louis. “Spline Functions Fitted by Standard Regression Methods,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, Volume 60, February 1978, pp. 132–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Statistics 1977, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1977.Google Scholar
[15]U.S. Department of Agriculture, Statistical Reporting Service. Crop Production CRD2-1, January 1966 and January 1976.Google Scholar
[16]U.S. Department of Commerce. Census of Agriculture, 1959, 1964, and 1974. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
[17]Woodruff, C. M. “Crop Response to Lime in the Midwestern United States,” ch. 5 in Soil Acidity and Liming, Pearson, Robert W. and Adams, Fred, eds., American Society of Agronomy, Madison Wisconsin, 1967.Google Scholar