Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T14:12:11.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Motivation for Organic Grain Farming in the United States: Profits, Lifestyle, or the Environment?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

Hikaru Hanawa Peterson
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
Andrew Barkley
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
Adriana Chacón-Cascante
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS Adriana Chacón-Cascante is currently an agricultural economics specialist at the Tropical Agricultural Research and Higher Education Center (CATIE) in Cartago, Costa Rica
Terry L. Kastens
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS

Abstract

The objective of this research is to identify and quantify the motivations for organic grain farming in the United States. Survey data of US organic grain producers were used in regression models to find the statistical determinants of three motivations for organic grain production, including profit maximization, environmental stewardship, and an organic lifestyle. Results provide evidence that many organic grain producers had more than a single motivation and that younger farmers are more likely to be motivated by environmental and lifestyle goals than older farmers. Organic grain producers exhibited a diversity of motivations, including profit and stewardship.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, M.D.Economics of Organic and Low-input Farming in the United States of America.” The Economics of Organic Framing: An International Perspective. Lampkin, N.H. and Padel, S., eds. Wallingford, UK: CAB International, 1994.Google Scholar
Artikov, I., Hoffman, S.J., Lynne, G.D., PytlikZillig, L.M., Hu, Q., Tomkins, A.J., Hubbard, K.G., Hayes, M.J., and Waltman, W.. “Understanding the Influence of Climate Forecasts on Farmer Decisions as Planned Behavior.” Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology 45(2006): 1202-14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barham, B.L., Brock, C., and Foltz, J.. Organic Dairy Farms in Wisconsin: Prosperous, Modern, and Expansive. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences PATS Research Report No. 16, June 2006.Google Scholar
Bishop, C.P., Shumway, C.R., and Wandschneider, P.R.. “Against Heterogeneity in Adoption of Anaerobic Digestion Technology: Integrating Economic, Diffusion, and Behavioral Innovation Theories.” Land Economics 86(2010): 585608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, M., Rigby, D., and Young, T.. “Modeling the Adoption of Organic Horticulture Technology in the UK Using Duration Analysis.” The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 47(2003):2954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, L.J.Survey Quantifies Cost of Organic Milk Production in California.” California Agriculture 56(2002): 157-62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cary, J.W., and Wilkinson, R.L.. “Perceived Profitability and Producers' Conservation Behavior.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 48(1997):1321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chouinard, H.H., Paterson, T., Wandscheider, P.R., and Ohler, A.M.. “Will Farmers Trade Profits for Stewardship? Heterogeneous Motivations for Farm Practice Selection.” Land Economics 84(2008):6682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constance, D.H., and Choi, J.Y.. “Overcoming the Barriers to Organic Adoption in the United States: A Look at Pragmatic Conventional Producers in Texas.” Sustainability 2(2010): 163-88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutforth, L.B., Francis, C.A., Lynne, G.D., Mortenson, D.A., and Eskridge, K.M.. “Factors Affecting Farmers' Diversity Approach.” American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 16(2001): 168-76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, T.J., Bragg, L.A., Kersbergen, R., Parsons, R., Rogers, G., Kauppila, D., Wang, A.. Cost and Returns to Organic Dairy Farming in Maine and Vermont for 2004. Orono, ME: University of Maine Department of Resource Economics and Policy Staff Paper #555, November 2005.Google Scholar
Dalton, T.J., Parsons, R., Kersbergen, R., Rogers, G., Kauppila, D., McCrory, L., Bragg, L.A., and Wang, Q.. A Comparative Analysis of Organic Dairy farms in Maine and Vermont: Farm Financial Information from 2004—2006. Orono, ME: University of Maine, Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station Bulletin 851, 2008.Google Scholar
Darnhofer, I., Schneeberger, W., and Freyer, B.. “Converting or Not Converting to Organic Farming in Austria: Farmer Types and Their Rationale.” Agriculture and Human Values 22(2005):3952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delate, K., Duffy, M., Chase, C., Holste, A., Friedrich, H., and Wantate, N.. “An Economic Comparison of Organic and Conventional Grain Crops in a Long-Term Agroecological Research (LTAR) Site in Iowa.” American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 18(2003):5969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobbs, T.L.Other Studies Compare Conventional and Sustainable Profitability.” Planting the Future: Developing an Agriculture That Sustains Land and Community. Bird, E.A.R., Bultena, G., and Gardner, J.C., eds. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Fairweather, J.R.Understanding How Farmers Choose between Organic and Conventional Production: Results from New Zealand and Policy Implications.” Agriculture and Human Values 16(1999):5163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glimcher, P.W., Camerer, C.F., Fehr, E., and Poldrack, R.A., eds. Neuroeconomics: Decision Making and the Brain. New York, NY: Academic Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Gold, M.V.Sustainable Agriculture: Definitions and Terms. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, National Agricultural Library, Special Reference Brief Series, 1999, pp. 99102.Google Scholar
Greene, C., and Kremen, A.. U.S. Organic Farming in 2000—2001: Adoption of Certified Systems. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Agriculture Information Bulletin No. 780, 2003.Google Scholar
Greene, W.H.Econometric Analysis. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2007.Google Scholar
Hanson, J., Dismukes, R., Chambers, W., Greene, C., and Kremen, A.. “Risk and Risk Management in Organic Agriculture: Views of Organic Farmers.” Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 19(2004):218-27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, J.C., Lichtenberg, E., and Peters, S.E.. “Organic versus Conventional Grain Production in the Mid-Atlantic: An Economic and Farming System Overview.” American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 12(1997):29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, W.M., and Lynne, G.D.. “Towards a Centerpiece for Ecological Economics.” Ecological Economics 49(2004):287301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heiman, R.D., and Peterson, H.H.. “Determinants of Premiums Received by Organic Field Crop Producers.” Review of Agricultural Economics 30(2008):729-49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honlonkou, A.N.Modeling Adoption of Natural Resources Management Technologies: The Case of Fallow Systems.” Environment and Development Economics 9(2004):289314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoppe, R.A., Korb, P., O'Donoghue, E.J., and Banker, D.E.. Structure and Finances of US Farms: Family Farm Report, 2007 Edition. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Economic Information Bulletin No. 24, 2007.Google Scholar
Hu, Q., PytlikZilig, L.M., Lynne, G.D., Hubbard, K.G., Waltman, W.J., Hayes, M.J., Tomkins, A.J., Hoffman, S.J., and Wilhite, D.A.. “Understanding Farmers' Forecast Use from Their Beliefs, Values, Social Norms and Perceived Obstacles.” Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology 45(2006): 1190-201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kallas, Z., Serra, T., and Gil, J.M.. “Farmers' Objectives as Determinants of Organic Farming Adoption: The Case of Catalonian Vineyard Production.” Agricultural Economics 41(2010):409-23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khaledi, M., Weseen, S., Sawyer, E., Ferguson, S., and Gray, R.. “Factors Influencing Partial and Complete Adoption of Organic Farming Practices in Saskatchewan, Canada.” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 58(2010):3756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klonsky, K., Brodt, S., Tourte, L., Dunan, R., Hendricks, L., Ohmart, C., and Verdegall, P.. “Influence of Farm Management Style on Adoption of Biologically Integrated Farming Practices in California.” Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 19(2004):237-47.Google Scholar
Lichtenberg, E.Cost-Responsiveness of Conservation Practice Adoption: A Revealed Preference Approach.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 29(2004):420-35.Google Scholar
Lynne, G.D.Modifying the Neoclassical Approach to Technology Adoption with Behavioral Science Models.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 27(1995):6780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynne, G.D.Divided Self Models of the Socioeconomic Person: The Metaeconomics Approach.” Journal of Socio-Economics 28(1999):267-88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynne, G.D.Agricultural Industrializations: A Metaeconomics Look at the Metaphors by Which We Live.” Review of Agricultural Economics 24(2002):410-27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynne, G.D.On the Economics of Subselves: Toward a Metaeconomics.” Altman, M., ed. Handbook of Contemporary Behavioral Economics: Foundations and Developments. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 2006a.Google Scholar
Lynne, G.D.Toward a Dual Motive Metaeconomic Theory.” Journal of Socio-Economics 35(2006b): 634-51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynne, G.D., and Casey, C.F.. “Regulation of Technology Adoption When Individuals Pursue Multiple Utility.” Journal of Socio-Economics 27(1998):701-19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynne, G.D., Casey, C.F., Hodges, A., and Rahmani, M.. “Conservation Technology Adoption Decisions and the Theory of Planned Behavior.” Journal of Economic Psychology 16(1995):581-98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynne, G.D., and Rola, L.R.. “Improving Attitude-Behavior Prediction Models with Economic Variables.” The Journal of Social Psychology 128(1988):1928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynne, G.D., Shonkwiler, J.S., and Rola, L.R.. “Attitudes and Farmer Conservation Behavior.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70(1988):1219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, P.R., Olson, K.D., Porter, P.M., Huggins, D.R., Perillo, C.A., and Crookston, R.K.. “Profitability of Organic Cropping Systems in Southwestern Minnesota.” Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 19(2004):3546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maybery, D., Crase, L., and Gullifer, C.. “Categorizing Farming Values as Economic, Conservation and Lifestyle”. Journal of Economic Psychology 26(2005):5972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBride, W.D., and Greene, C.. “The Profitability of Organic Soybean Production”. Renewable Agricultural and Food Systems 21(2009a):276-84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBride, W.D., and Greene, C.. “Characteristics, Costs, and Issues for Organic Dairy Farming.” Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Economic Research Report Number 82, 2009b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordquist, D., LaValla, J., Berg, M., and Moynihan, M.. 2009 Organic Farm Performance in Minnesota. Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota Department of Agriculture, 2010.Google Scholar
Nowak, P., and Korsching, P.. “The Human Dimension of Soil and Water Conservation: A Historical and Methodological Perspective.” Pierce, F.J. and Frye, W., eds. Advances in Soil and Water Conservation. Chelsea, MI: Ann Arbor Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Organic Trade Association (OTA). “Executive Summary: Organic Trade Association's 2007 Manufacturer Survey.” 2007. Internet site: www.ota.com/pics/documents/2007ExecutiveSummary. pdf (Accessed November 1, 2010).Google Scholar
Organic Trade Association (OTA). “The Organic Trade Association's 2009 Organic Industry Survey: Executive Summary.” May 2009. Internet site: www.ota.com/pics/ documents/01a_OTAExecutiveSummary.pdf (Accessed November 1, 2010).Google Scholar
Peterson, H.H., and Kastens, T.L.. “Organic Grain Farming in the United States: Report of the Findings from a Nationwide Survey Part I: Summary of Survey Responses.” Paper presented at 2006 Risk and Profit Conference, Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, August 17-18, 2006. Appendix 1. Internet site: www. agmanager.info/events/risk_profit/2006/Papers/ 15-Peterson-Risk%20and%20Profit%20of% 20Organic%20Grains.pdf (Accessed November 1, 2010).Google Scholar
Pimentel, D., Hepperly, P., Hanson, J., Douds, D., and Seidel, R.. “Environmental, Energetic, and Economic Comparisons of Organic and Conventional Farming Systems”. Bioscience 55(2005): 573-82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotz, C.A., Kamphuis, G.H., Karsten, H.D., and Weaver, R.D.. “Organic Dairy Production Systems in Pennsylvania: A Case Study Evaluation”. Journal of Dairy Science 90(2007):3961-79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sautter, J., Ovchinnikova, N., Kruse, C., and Lynne, G.. “Farmers' Decisions Regarding Carbon Sequestration: A Metaeconomic View”. Society & Natural Resources 24(2011): 133-47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A.K.Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory”. Philosophy ∓ Public Affairs 6, 1977,4:317-44.Google Scholar
Sheeder, R.J., and Lynne, G.D.. “Empathy-Conditioned Conservation: ‘Walking-in-the-Shoes-of-Others’ as a Conservation Farmer”. Land Economics 87(August 2011):433-52.Google Scholar
Smith, E.G., Clapperton, M.J., and Blackshaw, R.E.. “Profitability and Risk of Organic Production Systems in the Northern Great Plains”. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 19(2004): 152-58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stofferahn, C.W.Personal, Farm and Value Orientations in Conversion to Organic Farming”. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 33(2009):862-84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service (USDA/ERS). Organic production data set, 2010. Internet site: www.ers.usda.gov/Data/Organic/ (Accessed November 1, 2010).Google Scholar
Van Kooten, G., Weisensel, W.P., and Chinthammit, D.. “Valuing Tradeoffs between Net Returns and Stewardship Practices: The Case of Soil Conservation in Saskatchewan”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72(1990): 104-13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar