Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T20:18:33.710Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Meat Demand in the UK: A Differential Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Panos Fousekis  and
Brian J. Revell
Panos Fousekis
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics at the, Agricultural University of Athens, Greece
Brian J. Revell
Affiliation:
Agricultural and Food Economics and Dean of the School of Management at, Harper Adams University College in the UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A differential approach is employed to analyze demand for meat in the United Kingdom during 1989-99. Differential demand systems with fixed price effects (Rotterdam and CBS) better explain consumers' retail purchase allocation decisions for beef, lamb, pork, bacon and poultry compared with models containing variable price effects (NBR and differential AIDS). The real expenditure and the Hicksian demand elasticities are generally found to be quite different from earlier studies using AIDS models. A quality change index of meat consumption is constructed from the estimated CBS model estimation results and decomposed into real expenditure, substitution, trend, seasonal and residual effects.

Keywords

Meat demanddifferential approachmodel selectionUK
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , April 2000 , pp. 11 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alston, J., and Chalfant, J. (1993). “The Silence of the Lambdas: A Test for the AIDS and the Rotterdam Models”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75:304-13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amemiya, T. (1985). Advanced Econometrics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Attfield, C. (1985). “Homogeneity and Endogeneity in Systems of Demand Equations”. Journal of Econometrics 27, 197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bansback, B. (1995). “Towards A Broader Understanding of Meat Demand”. Journal of Agricultural Economics 46:287–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, W. (1983). “Definition of Second Order Approximations and of Flexible Functional Forms”. Economic Letters 12:31–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barten, A. (1993). “Consumer Allocation Models: Choice of Functional Form”. Empirical Economics 18:129-58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, G., Lee, J., and Seale, J. (1995). “A Family of Inverse Demand System and Choice of Functional Form”. Empirical Economics 20:519–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, M. and Young, T. (1992). “The Structure of Changing Tastes for Meat and Fish in Great Britain”. European Review of Agricultural Economics 19:165-80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, M., and Young, T. (1996). “The Impact of BSE on Demand for Beef and Other Meats in Great Britain”. Applied Economics 28:687–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caves, W., and Christensen, L. (1980). “Global Properties of Flexible Functional Forms”. American Economic Review 70:322-32.Google Scholar
Chesher, A., and Rees, H. (1987). “Income Elasticities of Demand for Food in Great Britain”. Journal of Agricultural Economics 38:433-48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deaton, A., and Muellbauer, J. (1980). “An Almost Ideal Demand System”. American Economic Review 70:312-26.Google Scholar
Diewert, W., and Wales, T. (1987). “Flexible Functional Forms and Global Curvature Conditions”. Econometrica 55:43–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, M. (1987). “Advertising and InterProduct Distribution of Demand”. European Economic Review 31, 1051-70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eales, J., and Unnevehr, L. (1994). “The Inverse Almost Ideal Demand System”. European Economic Review 38:101-15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eales, J., Durham, C., and Wessels, C. (1997). “Generalized Models of Japanese Demand for Fish”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79:1153-63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, X., and Spreen, T. (1994). “A Microeconomic Analysis of the U.S Meat Demand”. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 42:397-12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, W., and Shumway, C. (1989). “Nonro-bustness of Dynamic Dual Models of the US Dairy Industry”. Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 18, 18–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judge, G., Hill, R., Griffiths, W., Lufkepohl, H., and Lee, T. (1988). Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Econometrics. John Wiley, Chichester.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, W., and Driel, H. van (1985). “Differential Consumer Demand Analysis”. European Economic Review 27:375-90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kesavan, T., and Buhr, B. (1995). “Price Determination and Dynamic Adjustments: An Inverse Demand System Approach to Meat Products in the U.S”. Empirical Economics 20:681-98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laajaimi, A., and Albisu, M. (1997). “La Demand de Viandes et de Poissons en Espagne: Une Analyse Micro-Economique”. Cahiers d'Economie et Sociologie Rurale 42-43:72–91.Google Scholar
Lee, J., Brown, G., and Seale, J. (1994). “Model Choice in Consumer Analysis: Taiwan 197089”. American Journal of Agricultural Economies 76:504-12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moschini, G., and Meilke, K. (1989). “Modelling the Pattern of Structural Change in the U.S Meat Demand”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71:253-61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mountain, D. (1988). “The Rotterdam Model: An Approximation in Variable Space”. Econometrica 56:477-84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neves, P. (1987). “An Analysis of Consumer Demand in Portugal, 1958-81”. Memoire de Maîtrise en Sciences Economiques. Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.Google Scholar
Reynolds, A., and Goddard, E. (1991). “Structural Change in Canadian Meat Demand”. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 39:211-22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theil, H. (1965). “The Information Approach to Demand Analysis”. Econometrica 33:67–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theil, H. (1980). The System-Wide Approach to Microeconomics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Tiffin, A., and Tiffin, R. R. (1999). “Estimates of Food Demand Elasticities for Great Britain”. Journal of Agricultural Economics 50:140-47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weatherspoon, D., and Seale, J. L. Jr. (1995). “Do the Japanese Discriminate Against Australian Beef Imports? Evidence from the Differential Approach”. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 27(2):536–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar