Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T21:30:03.104Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Marketing by Design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Extract

The Southern Agricultural Economics Association has made great contributions to our profession. In doing so, it has provided a platform for its members to conduct research, teaching, and Extension education that contributed significantly to the economic growth and success of Southern agriculture and rural communities. I am humbled by the honor received through this Lifetime Achievement Award and want to thank the association and the many colleagues across the profession and in my department at Texas A&M University for their partnership and support over the years. I also want to thankmy wife and family for the contributions they have made to my professional career. Their interest and understanding helped me see through some of the difficult choices and times; and they were there for the celebrations as well. In this article, I have chosen a theme that, to me, has defined much of my professional career. We all have stories or life narratives. This is one of mine.

How can farmers engage in, or influence, downstream marketing activities in a way that increases returns for what would otherwise be a simple sale of a commodity at the market price? The idea of design in the context of marketing decisions of farmers evolved in my mind as the result of early experience on the farm and exposure in college to ideas that have influenced my career ever since.

Type
Lifetime Achievement Awards
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Crespi, J.M., and Sexton, R.J.. “U.S. Generic Advertising and Promotion Programs” in Armbruster and Knutson, eds. U.S. Programs Affecting Food and Agricultural Marketing.New York, NY: Springer, 2013.Google Scholar
Davis, G.C., Capps, O. Jr., Bessler, D.A. Leigh, J.H., Nichols, J.P., and Goddard, E.. An Economic Evaluation of the Pork Checkoff Program. Texas A&M University. Texas Agricultural Experiment Station. Departmental Technical Report (January 2001) No. 01-1.Google Scholar
King, R.P.The Science of Design.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 94,2(2012): 275-84.Google Scholar
Olson, M. [1965]. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups (Revised edition ed.). Boston, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Williams, G.W., and Nichols, P.J.. Effectiveness of Commodity Promotion, Texas A&M University. Texas Agricultural Market Research and Development Center, Information Report P 1-98. 1998.Google Scholar
Williams, G.W., Davis, G., and Nichols, J.P.. Checkoff Program Evaluation: Why, What, How, When and Who? Texas Agricultural Market Research and Development Center, Commodity Market Research Report No. CM 2-00. September 2000.Google Scholar