Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T02:48:51.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Market Impacts of Adopting Herbicide-Resistant Rice in the Southern United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Frank H. Fuller ,
Mamane M. Annou  and
Eric J. Wailes
Frank H. Fuller
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR
Mamane M. Annou
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR
Eric J. Wailes
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Herbicide-resistant (HR) rice varieties offer U.S. rice producers a powerful tool for control of red rice infestations. However, improved weed control can shorten crop rotations and boost yields, resulting in expanded rice production and lower domestic market prices. Declining market returns diminish the benefits of HR rice adoption and substantially reduce net returns for nonadopters. More competitive prices increase U.S. rice exports, causing a slight decline in world rice prices. The dependence of the rice marketing loan program on world prices prevents loan deficiency payments from adequately offsetting producers' market revenue losses. U.S. consumers gain from lower rice prices.

Keywords

biotechnologycrop rotationherbicide resistantred ricericesimulation modelstechnology adaptationQ11Q16Q18O33C53
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , April 2003 , pp. 185 - 193
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Annou, M., and Wailes, E.. “A Dynamic Decision Model of Technology Adoption Under Uncertainty: Case of Herbicide-Resistant Rice.” Unpublished manuscript, University of Arkansas, June 2002.Google Scholar
Annou, M., Thomsen, M., and Wailes, E.. “Impacts of Herbicide Resistant Rice Technology on Rice-soybeans Rotation.” AgBioForum 4,2(2001):79–86.Google Scholar
Annou, M., Wailes, E., and Cramer, G.. “Economic Analysis of Adopting Liberty Link Rice.” Rice Situation and Outlook Yearbook. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture/Economic Research Service, RCS-2000:55–61.Google Scholar
Baldwin, F.L. “Red Rice Control in Alternate Crops.” Red Rice: Research and Control. Eastin, E.F., ed. College Station, TX: Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 1270, 1978.Google Scholar
Carpenter, J., and Gianessi, L.. “Herbicide Tolerant Soybeans: Why Growers are Adopting Roundup Ready Varieties.” AgBioForum 2,2(1999):65–72.Google Scholar
Cartwright, R.Personal communication, University of Arkansas, February 23, 2001.Google Scholar
Deshaies, M. “Growing Better Rice.” Rice Farming (April 1996):4,6–7.Google Scholar
Fernandez-Cornejo, J., Klotz-Ingram, C., and Jans, S.. “Farm-Level Effects of Adopting Herbicide-Tolerant Soybeans in the U.S.A.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 34(April 2002):149–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, G.R., Vere, D.T., and Bootle, B.W.. “An Integrated Approach to Assessing the Farm and Market Level Impacts of New Technology Adoption in Australian Lamb Production and Marketing Systems: The Case of Large, Lean Lamb.” Agricultural Systems 47(1995):175–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, J., Chavez, E., Wailes, E., and Cramer, G.. “Arkansas Global Rice Model.” Unpublished manuscript, University of Arkansas, Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, December 2000.Google Scholar
Lemieux, C.M., and Wohlgenant, M.K.. “Ex Ante Evaluation of the Economic Impact of Agricultural Biotechnology: The Case of Porcine Somatotropin.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71(November 1989):903–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marra, M., Carlson, G., and Hubbell, B.. “Economic Impacts of the First Crop Biotechnologies.” Internet site: http://www.ag-econ.ncsu.edu/faculty/marra/FirstCrop/index.htm (Accessed June 25, 2002).Google Scholar
McBride, W.D., and Books, N.. “Survey Evidence on Producer Use and Costs of Genetically Modified Seed.” Agribusiness 16(Winter 2000):6–20.3.0.CO;2-7>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBride, W.D., and El-Osta, H.S.. “Impacts of the Adoption of Genetically Engineered Crops on Farm Financial Performance.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 34(April 2002):175–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noldin, J.A., Chandler, J.M., Ketchersid, M.L., and McCauley, G.N.. “Red Rice (Oryza sativa) Biology II Ecotype Sensitivity to Herbicides.” Weed Technology 13(January/March 1999):19–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, G.W., and Davis, J.S.. “Evaluating Returns to Agricultural Research: A Review.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 63(November 1981):685–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaton, N. “Introduction.” Rice Production Handbook. Slaton, N., ed. Little Rock, AR: University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture, Cooperative Extension Service, Publication MP 192, 2000.Google Scholar
Smith, R.J. Jr. “Weed Thresholds in Southern U.S. Rice, Oryza Sativa.” Weed Technology 2(1988):232–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R.J., and Seaman, D.E.. “Weeds and Their Control.” Rice in the United States: Varieties and Production. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture/Agricultural Research Service, Agricultural Handbook 289, 1973.Google Scholar
Wailes, E., Cramer, G., Chavez, E., and Hansen, J.. Arkansas Global Rice Model: International Baseline Projections for 2000-2010. Fayetteville, AR: University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture, Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station, Special Report 200, October 2000.Google Scholar
Wheeler, C. “Glufosinate for Weed Control in Genetically Transformed Rice.” Master's thesis, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, December 1998.Google Scholar