Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:29:05.913Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Links among Farm Productivity, Off-Farm Work, and Farm Size in the Southeast

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Jet Yee
Affiliation:
Iowa State University, Ames, IA
Mary Clare Ahearn
Affiliation:
Iowa State University, Ames, IA
Wallace Huffman
Affiliation:
Iowa State University, Ames, IA

Abstract

This paper examines the linkages among agricultural total factor productivity, farm size, and farm household participation in the off-farm labor market for the Southeastern states for the period 1960-1996. We find evidence of a simultaneous relationship between productivity and measures of farm structure. The results support the expected relationships between the endogenous variables, namely that productivity and farm size are positively related, farm size and off-farm work participation are negatively related, and off-farm work and productivity are negatively related. We find positive and significant impacts of government policies (investments in public research, extension, and highways) on productivity growth.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acquaye, A.K.A. and Jefferson, K.Y.. “Patterns of Post-War Agricultural Productivity in the Southeast and Delta Regions.” Paper presented at the Southern Agricultural Economics Association Meeting, Mobile, AL, February 2003.Google Scholar
Ahearn, M., Yee, J., Ball, E., and Nehring, R.. Agricultural Productivity in the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Agricultural Information Bulletin 740, January 1998.Google Scholar
Ahearn, M., Yee, J., and Bottum, J.. Regional Trends in Extension System Resources. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, AIB-781, April 2003. Internet site: http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/aib781 (Accessed April 2003).Google Scholar
Ahearn, M., Yee, J., and Huffman, W.. “The Impact of Government Policies on Agricultural Productivity and Structure: Preliminary Results.” Paper presented at the American Agricultural Economics Association Meetings, Long Beach, CA, July 27-30, 2002.Google Scholar
Antle, J.Infrastructure and Aggregate Agricultural Productivity: International Evidence.Economic Development and Cultural Change 31,3(1983):609–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, E.V., and Norton, G., eds. Agricultural Productivity: Measurement and Sources of Growth. Norwell, MA: Kluwer, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baltagi, B.Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1995.Google Scholar
Becker, G.S.A Theory of the Allocation of Time.Economic Journal 75(Sept. 1965):493517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, M.E., and McGuire, T.J.. Macroeconomic Analysis of the Linkages between Transportation Investments and Economic Performance. NCHRP Report 3889, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1997.Google Scholar
El-Osta, H., and Ahearn, M.. Estimating the Opportunity Cost of Unpaid Farm Labor for U.S. Farm Operators. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Technical Bulletin 1848, March 1996.Google Scholar
Griliches, Z.Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth.Bell Journal of Economics 10(Spring 1979):92116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griliches, Z.R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallam, A. (ed.). Size, Structure, and the Changing Face of American Agriculture. Boulder: West-view Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Hallberg, M., Findeis, J., and Lass, D.. Multiple Job Holding among Farm Families. Ames: Iowa State University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Hoppe, R. (ed.). Structural and Financial Characteristics of U.S. Farms:2001 Family Farm Report. Washington, DC: USDA, ERS, AIB 768, May 2001.Google Scholar
Hsiao, C.Analysis of Panel Data. London: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Huffman, W., and Evenson, R.. Science for Agriculture. Ames: Iowa State University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Huffman, W.Structural and Productivity Change in U.S. Agriculture, 1950-82.Agricultural Economics 24(2001):127–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huffman, W.E., McCunn, A., and Xu, J.. “Public Agricultural Research with an Agricultural Productivity Emphasis: Data for 48 States, 1927-1995.” Iowa State University, Staff Paper, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Khanna, J., Huffman, W., and Sandler, T.. “Agricultural Research Expenditures in the United States: A Public Goods Perspective.Review of Economics and Statistics 76,2(1994):267–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makki, S.S., and Tweeten, L.G.. “Impact of Research, Extension, Commodity Programs, and Prices on Agricultural Productivity.” Paper presented at the American Agricultural Economics Association Meetings, Orlando, FL, 1993.Google Scholar
McCunn, A., and Huffman, W.E.. “Convergence in U.S. Productivity Growth for Agriculture: Implications of Interstate Research Spillovers for Funding Agriculture Research.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82(May 2000):370–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishra, A., El-Osta, H., Morehart, M., Johnson, J., and Hopkins, J.. Income, Wealth, and the Economic Weil-Being of Farm Households. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Agricultural Economic Report 812, July 2002.Google Scholar
Mishra, A., and Goodwin, B.. “Farm Income Variability and the Supply of Off-Farm Labor.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79(1997):880–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, C.J., and Schwartz, A.E.. “State Infrastructure and Productive Performance.American Economic Review 86,5(1996):1095–111.Google Scholar
National Research Council (NRC). Publicly Funded Agricultural Research and the Changing Structure of U.S. Agriculture. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Multifunctionality: A Framework for Policy Analysis. AGR/CA (98)9, Paris, December 1998.Google Scholar
Strauss, J.The Theory and Comparative Statics of Agricultural Household Models: A General Approach.” Agricultural Household Models: Extensions, Applications, and Policy. Singh, Inderjit, Squire, Lyn, and Strauss, John, eds. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
USDA. 1997 Census of Agriculture. 1999 Agricultural Economic and Land Ownership Survey, Part IV, Volume 3, Special Studies. Washington, DC: National Agricultural Statistics Service, 2001.Google Scholar
USDA. Geographic Area Series, Part 51, Volume 1, Summary and State Data, AC97-A-51. Washington, DC: National Agricultural Statistics Service, 1999.Google Scholar
Wozniak, G.Joint Information Acquisition and New Technology Adoption: Later versus Early Adoption.Review of Economics and Statistics 75(1993):438–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yee, J., Huffman, W., and Ahearn, M.. “Sources of Agricultural Productivity Growth for the Southern States.” Paper presented at the Southern Agricultural Economics Association Meeting, Orlando, FL, February 2002.Google Scholar
Yee, J., Huffman, W., Ahearn, M., and Newton, D.. “Sources of Agricultural Productivity Growth at the State Level, 1960-1993.” Agricultural Productivity: Measurement and Sources. Ball, V.E. and Norton, G.W, eds. Norwell, MA: Kluwer, 2002.Google Scholar