Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:20:59.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Joint Estimation Method to Combine Dichotomous Choice CVM Models with Count Data TCM Models Corrected for Truncation and Endogenous Stratification

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

Juan Marcos González ,
John B. Loomis  and
Armando González-Cabán
Juan Marcos González
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO
John B. Loomis
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO
Armando González-Cabán
Affiliation:
USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station Forest Fire Laboratory, Riverside, CA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We update the joint estimation of revealed and stated preference data of previously published research to allow for joint estimation of the Travel Cost Method (TCM) portion using count data models. The TCM estimation also corrects for truncation and endogenous stratification as well as overdispersion. The joint estimation allows for testing consistency of behavior between revealed and stated preference data rather than imposing it. We find little gain in estimation efficiency, but our joint estimation might make a significant improvement in estimation efficiency when the contingent valuation scenarios involve major changes in site quality not reflected in the TCM data.

Keywords

contingent valuation modelsjoint estimationnonmarket valuationrecreationtravel cost modelsQ51
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , August 2008 , pp. 681 - 695
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamowicz, W., Louviere, J., and Williams, M.. “Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Methods for Valuing Environmental Amenities.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26(May 1994):271–92.Google Scholar
Azevedo, C.D., Herriges, J.A., and Kling, C.L.. “Combining Revealed and Stated Preferences: Consistency Tests and Their Interpretations.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85(August 2003):525–37.Google Scholar
Bowker, J.M., and Stoll, J.R.. “Use of Dichotomous Choice Nonmarket Methods to Value the Whooping Crane Resource.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70(May 1988):372–81.Google Scholar
Boyle, K.J. “Contingent Valuation in Practice.” A primer on Nonmarket Valuation. Champ, P., Boyle, K.J., and Brown, T.C, eds. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003.Google Scholar
Cameron, T. “Combining Contingent Valuation and Travel Cost Data for Valuation of Non-market Goods.” Land Economics 68(August 1992):302–17.Google Scholar
Cameron, T., and Englin, J.. “Respondent Experience and Contingent Valuation of Environmental Goods.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management Volume 33(1997):296–313.Google Scholar
Carson, R., Flores, N., Martin, K., and Wright, J.. “Contingent Valuation and Revealed Preference Methodologies: Comparing Estimates for Quasi-public Goods.” Land Economics 72(February 1996):80–99.Google Scholar
Chase, L.C., Lee, D.R., Shulze, W.D., and Anderson, D.J.. “Ecotourism Demand and Differential Pricing of National Park Access in Costa Rica.” Land Economics 74(November 1998):466–82.Google Scholar
Creel, M., and Loomis, J.. “Theoretical and Empirical Advantages of Truncated Count Data Estimating for Analysis of Deer Hunting in California.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72(May 1990):434–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Englin, J., and Cameron, T.A.. “Augmenting Travel Cost Models with Contingent Behavior Data: Poisson Regression Analyses with Individual Panel Data.” Environmental and Resource Economics 7(September 1996):133–47.Google Scholar
Englin, J., and Shonkwiler, J.S.. “Estimating Social Welfare Using Count Data Models: An Application to Long-Run Recreation Demand Under Conditions of Endogenous Stratification and Truncation.” Review of Economics and Statistics 77(February 1995):104–12.Google Scholar
Fix, P., and Loomis, J.. “Comparing the Economic Value of Mountain Biking Estimated Using Revealed and Stated Preference.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 41(1998):227–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellerstein, D. “Can We Count on Count Models?” Valuing Recreation and the Environment: Revealed Preference Methods in Theory and Practice. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 1999.Google Scholar
Hellerstein, D., and Mendelsohn, R.. “A Theoretical Foundation for Count Data Models.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75(August 1993):604–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loomis, J. “Panel Estimators to Combine Revealed and Stated Preference Dichotomous Choice Data.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 22(1997):233–45.Google Scholar
Loomis, J., Pierce, C., and Manfredo, M.. “Using the Demand for Hunting Licenses to Evaluate Contingent Valuation Estimates of Willingness to Pay.” Applied Economics Letters 7(2000):435–38.Google Scholar
Loomis, J.B. “Test-Retest Reliability of the Contingent Valuation Method: A Comparison of General Population and Visitor Responses.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71 (February 1989):76–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnell, K., Weninger, Q., and Strand, I.E.. “Joint Estimation of Contingent Valuation and Truncated Recreational Demands.” Valuing Recreation and the Environment: Revealed Preference Methods in Theory and Practice. Herriges, J.A. and Kling, C.L., eds. Cheltenham, Glos, England: Edlward Elgar Publishing Limited, 1999.Google Scholar
Poe, G.L., Giraud, K.L., and Loomis, J.B.. “Computational Methods for Measuring the Difference of Empirical Distributions.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87(May 2005):353–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randall, A. “Beyond the Crucial Experiment: Mapping the Performance Characteristics of Contingent Valuation.” Energy and Resource Economics 20(1998):197–206.Google Scholar
Shaw, D. “On-Site Samples Regression: Problems of Non-negative Integers, Truncation and Endogenous Stratification.” Journal of Econometrics 37(February 1988):211–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shonkwiler, J.S. “Recreation Demand Systems for Multiple Site Count Data Travel Cost Models.” Valuing Recreation and the Environment: Revealed Preference Methods in Theory and Practice. Herriges, J.A., and Kling, C.L., eds. Cheltenham, Glos, England: Edlward Elgar Publishing Limited, 1999.Google Scholar