Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T17:53:31.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is Monsanto Leaving Money on the Table? Monopoly Pricing and Bt Cotton Value with Heterogeneous Adopters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

James F. Oehmke  and
Christopher A. Wolf
James F. Oehmke
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI
Christopher A. Wolf
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We examine the allocation of technology rents between a price-setting, innovating monopolist and heterogeneous technology adopters. A model of monopoly pricing in the presence of heterogeneous adopters is used to examine conditions under which greater producer (farmer) heterogeneity leads to greater producer benefit from innovation in noncompetitive markets. An application to Bt cotton determines the profit-maximizing price of Bt cotton seed and reveals that Monsanto and Delta and Pine Land are indeed leaving money on the table in the form of unexploited profit opportunities. However, we estimate that the presence of heterogeneous adopters explains over 80% of the rents that accrue to the farmers.

Keywords

biotechnologyBt cottonheterogeneous adoptersinnovationmonopoly pricingtechnologyvaluation distributionL1O3Q1
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , December 2004 , pp. 705 - 718
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdulkadri, A.O., and Langemeier, M.R.. “Using Farm Consumption Data to Estimate the Intertemporal Elasticity of Substitution and Relative Risk Aversion Coefficients.” Agricultural Finance Review 60(2000):61–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, J., Sexton, R., and Zhang, M.. “The Effect of Imperfect Competition on the Size and Distribution of Research Benefits.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79(November 1997):1252–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacheler, J.S., Mott, D.W., and Morrison, D.E.. “Large Scale Evaluation of Bollgard Resistance to Multiple Pests in North Carolina under Grower Conditions.” Proceedings of the Belt-wide Cotton Conference. Internet site: http://www.cotton.org/beltwide/proceedings.cfm. (1998):961–64.Google Scholar
Bain, J.S. “A Note on Pricing in Monopoly and Oligopoly.” American Economic Review 39(March 1949):448–64.Google Scholar
Bryant, K.J., Robertson, W.C., and Lorenz, G.M.. “Economic Evaluation of Bollgard Cotton in Arkansas.” Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference. Internet site: http://www.cotton.org/beltwide/proceedings.cfm.(1999):349–50.Google Scholar
Bryant, K.J., Robertson, W.C., and Lorenz, G.M.. “Economic Evaluation of Bollgard Cotton in Arkansas:1997.” Proceedings of the Belt-wide Cotton Conference. Internet site: http://www.cotton.org/beltwide/proceedings.cfm. (1998):388–89.Google Scholar
Campbell, J.Y. “Understanding Risk and Return.” Journal of Political Economics 104(April 1996):298–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamberlain, E.H.The Theory of Monopolistic Competition. 6th ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1950.Google Scholar
Choi, J., Kwan, E., and Menezes, C.F.. “Is Relative Risk Aversion Greater than One?” International Review of Economics and Finance 1(1992):43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, FT., Scott, W.P., Meeks, D., and Parvin, D.W.. “The Economics of Bt Cotton in the Mississippi DeltA—A Progress Report.” Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference. Internet site: http://www.cotton.org/beltwide/proceedings.cfm. (2000):332–34.Google Scholar
Deville, S.F., Mullins, J.W., and Mills, J.M.. “Seven Years of Economic Comparisons of Bollgard Cotton.” Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference. Internet site: http://www.cotton.org/beltwide/proceedings.cfm. (2002).Google Scholar
Falck-Zepeda, J.B., Traxler, G., and Nelson, R.G.. “Surplus Distribution from the Introduction of a Biotechnology Innovation.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82(May 2000):360–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, B.L.The Economics of Agricultural Policies. New York: Macmillan Publishing, 1987.Google Scholar
Gibson, J.W., Laughlin, D., Lutrell, R.G., Parker, D., Reed, J., and Harris, A.. “Comparison of Costs and Returns Associated with Heliothis Resistant Bt Cotton to Non-resistant Varieties.” Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference. Internet site: http://www.cotton.org/beltwide/proceedings.cfm. (1997):244–47.Google Scholar
Green, C.J. “Asset Demands and Asset Prices in the U.K.: Is There a Risk Premium?” Manchester School of Economics and Social Studies 58(September 1990):211–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, G.M., and Helpman, E.. “Quality Ladders and Product Cycles.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (1991):557–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbell, B.J., Marra, M.C., and Carlson, G.A.. “Estimating the Demand for a New Technology: Bt Cotton and Insecticide Policies.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82(February 2000):118–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karner, M., Hutson, A.L., and Goodson, J.. “Bollgard—Impact and Value to Oklahoma's Cotton Industry 1996-1999.” Proceedings of the Belt-wide Cotton Conference. Internet site: http://www.cotton.org/beltwide/proceedings.cfm. (2000):1289–93.Google Scholar
Leland, H.E., and Meyer, R.A.. “Monopoly Pricing Structures with Imperfect Discrimination.” The Bell Journal of Economics 7,2(Autumn 1976):449–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marra, M., Hubbell, B., and Carlson, G.. “Information Quality, Technology Depreciation, and Bt Cotton Adoption in the Southeast.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 26(2001):158–75.Google Scholar
Marra, M., Paneli, D., and Ghadim, A.. “The Economics of Risk, Uncertainty and Learning in the Adoption of New Agricultural Technologies: Where Are We on the Learning Curve?” Agriculture Systems 75(2003):215–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moschini, G., and Lapan, H.. “Intellectual Property Rights and the Welfare Effects of Agricultural R&D.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79(November 1997):1229–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moschini, G., and Lapan, H.. “Incomplete Adoption of a Superior Innovation.” Economica 67(November 2000):525–42.Google Scholar
Mullins, J.W., and Mills, J.M.. “Economics of Bollgard® versus non-Bollgard Cotton in 1998.” Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference. Internet site: http://www.cotton.org/beltwide/proceedings.cfm. (1999):958–61.Google Scholar
Newbery, D.M.G.and Stiglitz, J.E.. The Theory of Commodity Price Stabilization. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Oppenhuizen, M., Mullins, J.W., and Mills, J.M.. “Six Years of Economic Comparisons of Bollgard® Cotton.” Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference. Internet site: http://www. cotton.org/beltwide/proceedings.cfm. (2001):862–65.Google Scholar
Qaim, M., and DeJanvry, A.. “Genetically Modified Crops, Corporate Pricing Strategies, and Farmers' Adoption: the Case of Bt Cotton in Argentina.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85,4(November 2003):814–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, J.T., Stewart, S., Laughlin, D., Harris, A., Furr, R., and Ruscoe, A.. “Bt and Conventional Cotton in the Hills and Delta of Mississippi: Five Years of Comparison.” Proceedings of the Belt-wide Cotton Conference. Internet site: http://www.cotton.org/beltwide/proceedings.cfm. (2000):1027–30.Google Scholar
Rejesus, R.M., Greene, J.K., Hamming, M.D., and Curtis, C.E.. “Economic Analysis of Insect Management Strategies for Transgenic Bt Cotton Production in South Carolina.” Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference. Internet site: http://www.cotton.org/beltwide/proceedings.cfm. (1997) :247–52.Google Scholar
Roberts, P.R., and Guillebeau, P.. “Corn Ear-worm.” Internet site: http://www.gaipm.org/top50/cornearworm.html (Accessed February 2003).Google Scholar
Schmalensee, R. “Industrial Economics: An Overview.” The Economic Journal 98(September 1988):643–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seward, R.W., Shelby, P.P., and Danehower, S.C.. “Performance and Insect Control Cost of Bollgard vs. Conventional Varieties in Tennessee.” Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference. Internet site: http://www.cotton.org/beltwide/proceedings.cfm. (2000):1055–57.Google Scholar
Silverman, B.W.Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. New York: Chapman and Hall, 1986.Google Scholar
Stark, C.R. Jr. “Economics of Transgenic Cotton: Some Indications Based on Georgia Producers.” Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference. Internet site: http://www.cotton.org/beltwide/proceedings.cfm. (1997):251–53.Google Scholar
Tauer, L. “The Estimated Impact of Recombinant Bovine Somatotropin on New York Dairy Farms for the Years 1994 Through 1997.” Ag-bioforum 2(2001):115–23.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service. Agricultural Statistics, Washington, DC, 1995–2001.Google Scholar
Wier, A.T., Mullins, J.W., and Mills, J.M.. “Bollgard Cotton—Update and Economic Comparisons Including New Varieties.” Proceedings of the Belt-wide Cotton Conference. Internet site: http://www.cotton.org/beltwide/proceedings.cfm. (1998) :1039–40.Google Scholar