Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T11:22:49.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Income Effects on the Trade Balance in the United States: Analysis by Sector

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

Dragan Miljkovic  and
Rodney Paul
Dragan Miljkovic
Affiliation:
North Dakota State University
Rodney Paul
Affiliation:
St. Bonaventure University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examines the causes of the countercyclicality of the trade balance in the three major sectors of the U.S. economy: services, manufacturing, and agriculture. These results are compared with the results pertinent to the U.S. economy as a whole. At the macroscopic level, Sachs' hypothesis seems to explain the countercyclicality of the trade balance, while results are mixed across individual sectors. The services sector may be explained by Sachs’ hypothesis, while results for the manufacturing sector are more consistent with the real business cycle hypothesis. The results for the agricultural sector, however, cannot be explained by either hypothesis.

Keywords

decomposition of variancereal business cycletrade balanceF4E32
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 40 , Issue 3 , December 2008 , pp. 967 - 982
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmed, S. “Temporary and Permanent Government Spending.” Journal of Monetary Economics 17(March 1986): 197–224.Google Scholar
Ahmed, S., Ickes, B.W., Wang., P., and Yoo, B.S. “International Business Cycles.” American Economic Review 83(May 1993):335-59.Google Scholar
Ahmed, S., and Park, J.H. “Sources of Macroeconomic Fluctuations in Small Open Economies.” Journal of Macroeconomics 16(January 1994): 1–36.Google Scholar
Baek, J., and Koo, W. “Dynamic Interrelationships between the U.S. Agricultural Trade Balance and the Macroeconomy.” Journal of Agricultural & Applied Economics 39(December 2007):457-70.Google Scholar
Bayoumi, T., and Eichengreen, B. “Macroeconomic Adjustment Under Bretton Woods and the Post-Bretton Woods Float: An Impulse Response Analysis.” The Economic Journal 104(July 1994):813-27.Google Scholar
Bhagwati, J. “The Generalized Theory of Distortions and Welfare.” Trade, Balance of Payments, and Growth: Papers in International Economics in Honor of Charles P. Kindleberger, Bhagwati, J., ed. Amsterdam, Holland: North Holland, 1971.Google Scholar
Blanchard, O.J., and Quah, D. “The Dynamic Effects of Aggregate Demand and Supply Disturbances.” The American Economic Review 79(September 1989):655-73.Google Scholar
Bruno, M. “Adjustment and Structural Changes Under Supply Shocks.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 84(June 1982): 199–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardia, E. “The Dynamics of a Small Open Economy in Response to Monetary, Fiscal, and Productivity Shocks.” Journal of Monetary Economics 28(December 1991):411-34.Google Scholar
Clarida, R., and Gali, J. “Sources of Real Exchange Rate Fluctuations: How Important Are Nominal Shocks.” NBER Working Paper No. 4658, 1994.Google Scholar
Enders, W. Applied Econometric Time Series. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1995.Google Scholar
Enders, W., and Lee, B.S. “Accounting for Real and Nominal Exchange Rate Movements in the Post-Bretton Woods Period.” Journal of International Money and Finance 16(April 1997): 233-54.Google Scholar
Glick, R., and Rogoff, K. “Global Versus Country-Specific Productivity Shocks and the Current Account.” Journal of Monetary Economics 35(February 1995): 159-92.Google Scholar
Hall, A. “Testing for a Unit Root with Pretest Data-Based Model Selection.” Journal of Business and Economics Statistics 12(October 1994): 461-70.Google Scholar
Jorgenson, D.W., and Stiroh, K.J. “Raising the Speed Limit: U.S. Economic Growth in the Information Age.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1(2000): 125–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y. “The Income and Terms of Trade Effects: A Permanent versus Transitory Decomposition in US Trade.” Journal of International Money and Finance 13(December 1994):658-78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y. “Income Effects on the Trade Balance.” Review of Economics and Statistics 78(August 1996):464-69.Google Scholar
Krugman, P. “Domestic Distortions and the Deindustrialization Hypothesis.” The Political Economy of Trade Policy: Papers in Honor of Jagdish Bhagwati. Feenstra, R.C., Grossman, G.M. and Irwin, D.A., eds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Lastrapes, W.D. “Sources of Fluctuations in Real and Nominal Exchange Rates.” Review of Economics and Statistics 74(August 1992):530-39.Google Scholar
Lucas, R. “Expectations and the Neutrality of Money.” Journal of Economic Theory 4(April 1972): 103-24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marion, N. “Nontraded Goods, Oil Price Increases, and the Current Account.” Journal of International Economics 16(February 1984):29–44.Google Scholar
Mendoza, E.G. “Real Business Cycles in a Small Open Economy.” American Economic Review 81(September 1991):797–818.Google Scholar