Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T16:43:45.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of the Food Stamp Program on Low Income Household Food Consumption in Rural Florida*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Pamela H. Neenan  and
Carlton G. Davis
Pamela H. Neenan
Affiliation:
Food and Resource Economics Department, University of Florida
Carlton G. Davis
Affiliation:
Food and Resource Economics Department, University of Florida
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One objective of the Food Stamp Program (FSP) is to supplement food expenditures of low income households to enhance the household's ability to provide nutritionally adequate diets. A household may consist of any person, or group of persons, who purchase, store and prepare food. Program eligibility is based on net household income, total assets and household size. Eligible households purchase coupons which are used in retail food outlets. Households of equal size receive coupon allotments of equal purchasing value, but the cash purchase requirement varies with net income. Bonus stamps represent the difference between the purchase requirement and the coupon allotment value.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , December 1977 , pp. 89 - 97
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Florida Agricultural Experiment Station Journal Series No. 690.

References

[1[ Becker, G. S. Economie Theory, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc., 1971.Google Scholar
[2[ Benus, J., Kementa, J. and Shapiro, H.. “The Dynamics of Household Budget Allocations to Food Expenditures,” Review of Economies and Statistics, Volume 58, No. 2, May 1976, pp. 129–138.Google Scholar
[3[ Clarkson, Kenneth W. Food Stamps and Nutrition, Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Research, 1975.Google Scholar
[4[ Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services. Jacksonville, Florida: Office of Social and Economic Services, May 1976.Google Scholar
[5[ Duval, E. M. Family Development, New York: J. B. Lippincott Co., 1967.Google Scholar
[6[ Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program, Polk County, Florida. Data compiled from county annual report, December 1975.Google Scholar
[7[ Feaster, J. G. and Perkins, G. B.. Families in the Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program: Comparison of Food Stamp and Food Distribution Program Participants and Nonparticipants, USDA-ERD Report No. 246, Washington, D.C., 1973.Google Scholar
[8[ Federal Register, Washington, D.C., May 7, 1976.Google Scholar
[9[ Gorman, W. M. “Separable Utility and Aggregation,” Econometrica, Volume 27, No. 3, 1959, pp. 469–481.Google Scholar
[10[ Houthakker, H. S. “Additive Preferences,” Econometrica, Volume 28, No. 1, 1960, pp. 62–87.Google Scholar
[11[ Johnston, J. Econometric Methods, Second Edition, New York: McGraw Hill Book Company, 1972.Google Scholar
[12[ Lancaster, K. L. “A New Approach to Consumer Theory,” Journal of Political Economy, Volume 74, 1966, pp. 132–157.Google Scholar
[13[ Lane, S. Food Distribution and Food Stamp Program Effects on Nutritional Achievement of Low Income Households in Kern County, California, Unpublished report, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of California, Davis, 1974.Google Scholar
[14[ Lewin, K. “Forces Behind Food Habits and Methods of Change” in The Problems of Changing Food Habits, National Research Council Bulletin, No. 108,1942, pp. 35–65.Google Scholar
[15[ Madden, P. J. and Yoder, M. D.. Program Evaluation: Food Stamps and Commodity Distribution in the Rural Areas of Central Pennsylvania, The Pennsylvania State University Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin No. 780, 1972.Google Scholar
[16[ Maslow, A. H. “Theory of Human Motivation,” Psychological Review, Volume 50, 1943, pp. 105–127.Google Scholar
[17[ Mittlehammer, R. and D. West. “Food Stamp Participation Among Low-Income Households: Theoretical Considerations of the Impact on the Demand for Food,” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Volume 7, No. 1, July 1975, pp. 223–231.Google Scholar
[18[ National Research Council. Recommended Dietary Allowances, Washington, D.C.: Food and Nutrition Board, National Academy of Sciences, 1973.Google Scholar
[19[ Prochaska, Fred J. and Schrimper, R. A.. “Opportunity Cost of Time and Other Socioeconomic Effects on Away-From-Home Consumption,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Volume 55, No. 4, Part I, 1973, pp. 595–603.Google Scholar
[20[ Strotz, R. H. “The Empirical Implication of a Utility Tree,” Econometrica, Volume 25, April 1957, pp. 132–157.Google Scholar
[21[ U.S. Bureau of the Census. Census Population: Detailed Characteristics of Florida, 1970, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1972.Google Scholar
[22[ U.S. Bureau of the Census. “Characteristics of the Low Income Population: 1973,” Current Population Reports, Series P-60, No. 98, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1975.Google Scholar
[23[ West, D. and Price, D.. “The Effects of Income, Assets, Food Programs and Household Size on Food Consumption,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Volume 58, No. 4, 1976, pp. 725–730.Google Scholar