Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:28:25.966Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of Food Stamp and Nutrition Education Programs on Food Group Expenditure And Nutrient Intake of Low Income Households

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

C. G. Davis  and
P. H. Neenan
C. G. Davis
Affiliation:
Food and Resource Economics Department, University of Florida
P. H. Neenan
Affiliation:
Food and Resource Economics Department, University of Florida
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Few researchers have attempted to assess the impact of the Food Stamp Program (FSP) on both food expenditures and nutritional status [1, 3, 6]. Even fewer have evaluated the joint impact of income supplement programs, such as the FSP, and nutrition education programs, such as the Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program (EFNEP), on the nutritional status of participating households [4, 10]. The purpose of this article is to (1) identify selected food group and corresponding nutrient intake responses associated with participation in the FSP and EFNEP, (2) simulate the nutritional impact of alternative policy mechanisms with joint FSP and EFNEP participation, and (3) explore policy implications for food and nutrition program planning.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , December 1979 , pp. 121 - 129
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Clarkson, K. W.Food Stamps and Nutrition. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Research, 1975.Google Scholar
[2]Council on Food and Nutrition. “Malnutrition and Hunger in the United States,” Journal of the American Medical Association, Volume 23, 1970, pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
[3]Lane, S. “Food Distribution and Food Stamp Program Effects on Food Consumption and Nutritional ‘Achievement’ of Low Income Persons in Kern County, California,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Volmue 60, 1978, pp. 108–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Leidenfrost, N.EFNEP: Accomplishments and Future Needs. Washington, D.C.: USDA-Ex-tension Service HE-89, 1975.Google Scholar
[5]Madden, J. P., Goodman, S. J., and Guthrie, H. H.. “Validity of the 24-hour Recall,” Journal of the American Dietetic Association, Volume 68, 1976, pp. 143–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Madden, J. P. and Yoder, M. D.. Program Evaluation: Food Stamps and Commodity Distribution in Rural Areas of Central Pennsylvania. University Park: Pennsylvania State University, Experiment Station Bulletin No. 780, 1972.Google Scholar
[7]National Research Council. Recommended Dietary Allowances. Washington, D. C.: Food and Nutrition Board, National Academy of Sciences, 1973.Google Scholar
[8]Neenan, Pamela H. and Davis, Carlton G.. “Impact of the Food Stamp Program on Low Income Household Food Consumption in Rural Florida,” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Volume 9, 1977, pp. 89–98.Google Scholar
[9]U.S. Bureau of the Census. “Census Population:-Detailed Characteristics of Florida, 1970.” Washington, D. C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1972.Google Scholar
[10]U.S. Department of Agriculture/ESCS. The Food Stamp Program: A Review of Selected Economic Studies. Washington, D.C.: USDA-ESCS-34, September 1978.Google Scholar