Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:10:24.604Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Future of Land Grant Universities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

G. Edward Schuh*
Affiliation:
Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis

Extract

The United States has for long had the world's premier system of higher education. No other country has anything that comes close to our major research universities (whether they be private or public), and that includes our international competitors, Germany and Japan. Our society expects a lot of our universities, and much more than other countries expect of theirs. For example, we were the only country in the world that turned to our universities (and especially to our land grants) to deliver an important part of our foreign policy in the form of economic and technical assistance to the developing countries.

Type
Invited Papers and Discussions
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Edward, Schuh G., “Universities Under Stress,” presented at Symposium, “After Fifty Years of Change, Wither the Land Grant University?” sponsored by the Hubert Humphrey, H. Institute of Public Affairs and the University of Minnesota's Graduating Class of 1942, Cowles Auditorium, University of Minnesota, October 15-16, 1992a.Google Scholar
Adkinson, Richard C, and Tuzin, Donald, “Equilibrium in the Research University,” Change, May/June 1992, pp. 2131.Google Scholar
Ashenfelter, Orley, and Krueger, Alan, “Estimates of the Economic Returns to Schooling from a New Sample of Twins,Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, 1992.Google Scholar
Schuh, G. Edward, “Privatization of Agricultural Research at Land Grant Universities,” prepared for the Office of Technological Assessment,” U.S. Congress, 1992.Google Scholar
Rosovsky, Henry, “Annual Report of the Dean of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences, 1990-1991,” Harvard University, 1991.Google Scholar
Rosovsky, Henry, “Voices,” Policy Perspectxsives, Institute for Research on Higher Education, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Vol. 4, No. 2 (September 1992), Section II, pp. 1B-2B.Google Scholar