No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Food Stamp Program Impact on Resource Use: Texas Compared with The U.S., Fiscal Year 1974*
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 April 2015
Extract
During fiscal year 1974 the National Food Stamp Program disbursed $2.7 billion in bonus stamps. Of this amount, Texas received about $208 million. These money injections will increase each economy's final demand, ceteris paribus.
However, an increase in the final demand of low income households will result in a discernibly different pattern of resource allocation than would occur if it came from high income households: the larger the increase in final demand, the greater the impact on patterns of resource use. The amount of bonus stamps distributed has reached a point where impacts may be identifiable.
The source of funds likewise affects such expenditure patterns and resulting resource use. For example, when funds for bonus stamps are raised by increasing taxes of the higher income households, their expenditure patterns will reflect their increased tax payments. In contrast, when funds are raised by sale of government securities, the immediate impact will be different, in part because individuals account for only about 16 percent of the ownership of all federal securities.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1977
Footnotes
*
Thanks to the following colleagues for their constructive comments: Gar Forsht, Alden Manchester, Bill Boehm, Masao Matsumoto, Gerald Schluter, FNS/ERS, USDA, and Herbert Grubb, Water Development Board, Governor's Office, Austin, Texas. The comments of unknown reviewers are also appreciated. Views expressed do not necessarily represent those of either the U.S. Department of Agriculture or the State of Texas.
References
[1[
Grubb, Herbert. The Structure of the Texas Economy: Input-Output Analysis, Volume 1, Office of the Governor, Austin, Texas, 1973.Google Scholar
[2[
Nelson, Paul E. Jr. and Perrin, John. Economic Effects of the U.S. Food Stamp Program—Calendar Year 1972 and Fiscal Year 1974. Agricultural Economic Report 331, ERS, USDA, Washington, D.C., July 1976.Google Scholar
[3[
Nelson, Paul E. Jr. and Perrin, John. Economic Effects of the Federal Contributions to the U.S. School Lunch Program—Calendar Year 1972 and Fiscal Year 1974. Agricultural Economic Report No. 350, ERS, USDA, Washington, D.C., September 1976.Google Scholar
[4[
Nelson, Paul E. Jr. and Perrin, John. “Technical Supplement to Analysis of the Economic Impacts of the U.S. Food Stamp and School Lunch Programs,” ERS, NEAD, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., July 1976.Google Scholar
[5[
Reese, Robert B.
et. al.
Bonus Stamps and Cash Income Supplements, Marketing Research Report 1034, ERS, USDA, October 1974.Google Scholar
[7[
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Research Service. Food Consumption of Households, Southern Region—Seasons and Year, 1965–1966.Google Scholar
[8[
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Research Service. Food Consumption of Households, U.S. Seasons and Year, 1965-1966.Google Scholar
[9[
U.S. Department of Commerce. Survey of Current Business, “The Input-Output Structure of the U.S. Economy,” February 1967, p. 24.Google Scholar
[10[
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. Statistical Abstract, 97th Edition, Washington, D.C., 1976.Google Scholar
[11[
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Consumer Expenditures: Total Urban and Rural, Southern Region, Washington, D.C., 1966.Google Scholar
[12[
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Consumer Expenditures: Total Urban and Rural, U.S., Washington, D.C., 1966.Google Scholar