Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:14:01.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Food Stamp Program Effects on Availability Of Food Nutrients for Low Income Families In the Southern Region of the United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

W. Keith Scearce  and
Robert B. Jensen
W. Keith Scearce
Affiliation:
Oklahoma State University
Robert B. Jensen
Affiliation:
Farmbank Services, Denver Colorado
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The food stamp program, as enacted into law in 1964, was intended to improve the diet of low income households, but whether the program resulted in a nutritional improvement remains a controversial question. Several studies have evaluated the nutritional impact of the food stamp program on participant households. In general, the study findings do not conclusively resolve the question of nutritional improvement for participant families. Studies of California families showed some nutritional improvements among food stamp recipients in comparison with nonrecipients [7, 8]. A study in Pennsylvania showed no nutritional improvements, except in temporary periods of cash shortage [9].

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , December 1979 , pp. 113 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Adrian, John and Daniel, Raymond. “Impact of Socio-Economic Factors on Consumption of Selected Food Nutrients in the United States,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Volume 58, February 1976, pp. 31–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Bassmann, R. L. “A Theory of Demand with Variable Consumer Preferences,” Ph.D. dissertation, Iowa State University, 1955.Google Scholar
[3]Carlson, Michael D. “The 1972–73 Consumer Expenditure Survey,” Monthly Labor Review, Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, December 1974.Google Scholar
[4]Coe, Richard. “Participation in the Food Stamp Program Among the Poverty Population,” in Five Thousand American Families—Patterns of Economic Progress, Volume 4. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, 1976.Google Scholar
[5]Hassan, Zuhair A. and Johnson, S. R.. Urban Food Consumption Patterns in Canada, Agriculture Canada Economics Branch, Publication No. 77/1, January 1977.Google Scholar
[6]Hoover, Dale M. and Whittaker, James K.. Regression Analysis of North Carolina Nutrition Survey Data: Some Problems and Tentative Findings, North Carolina State University, December 1972.Google Scholar
[7]Lane, Sylvia. “Food Distribution and Food Stamp Program Effects on Food Consumption and Nutritional ‘Achievement’ of Low Income Persons in Kerns County California,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Volume 60, February, 1978, pp. 108–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Logan, S. H. and Deloach, D. B.. The Food Stamp Program: Del Norte and Humboldt Counties, California. University of California, Agricultural Experiment Station, Davis, California, 1973.Google Scholar
[9]Madden, J. Patrick and Yoder, Marion D.. Program Evaluation: Food Stamps and Commodity Distribution in Rural Areas of Central Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania State University, Agricultural Experiment Station, Bulletin 780, June 1972.Google Scholar
[10]Samuelson, Paul A.Foundations of Economic Analysis, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard Press, 1947.Google Scholar
[11]Scearce, W. Keith. “An Economic Analysis of the Effect of the Food Stamp Program on the Availability of Selected Food Nutrients for Families in the Southern Region of the United States,” unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, March 1978.Google Scholar
[12]Suvannant, Veraphal. “Measurement of Quantities and Price of Product Qualities,” Ph.D. dissertation, Iowa State University, 1973.Google Scholar
[13]Tintner, G. “Complementarity and Shifts in Demand,” Metroeconomica, Volume 4, 1952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Watt, Bernice K. and Merrill, Annabel. Composition of Foods: Raw, Processed, Prepared, U.S.D.A. Agricultural Research Service, Agricultural Handbook 8, 1963.Google Scholar