Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T20:36:39.577Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Estimating the Effects of Pesticide Use on Burley and Flue-Cured Tobacco

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

George W. Norton  and
G. Andrew Bernat Jr.
George W. Norton
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
G. Andrew Bernat Jr.
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The only pesticides a farmer may use on his crops are those that are registered for such use by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Registration of a particular pesticide can be withdrawn or partially restricted if the EPA determines that the risk to society outweighs the benefits of continued unrestricted use.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , December 1983 , pp. 93 - 98
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

International Monetary Fund. International Financial Statistics, various issues.Google Scholar
Marshall, J. P. “Provisions of the Current Tobacco Program.” Southern Extension Marketing Publication 79-1, September 1979.Google Scholar
Mann, C. K.Tobacco: The Ants and the Elephants. Salt Lake City: Olympus Publishing Co., 1975.Google Scholar
Mann, J. S. “A Dynamic Model of the U.S. Tobacco Economy.” Agr. Econ. Res. 25(1973):401–411.Google Scholar
Mann, Roger. “A Recursive Model of the U.S. Tobacco Industry at the Farm Level.” Paper presented at the Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, February 2, 1981.Google Scholar
Norton, D. T. “Institutional Intervention in the Market for an Internationally Traded Commodity: U.S. Flue-Cured Tobacco.” Ph.D. thesis, North Carolina State University, 1981.Google Scholar
Reed, M. R. “An Analysis of Policy Alternatives for the U.S. Burley Tobacco Market.” S. J. Agr. Econ. 12(1980):71–76.Google Scholar
Reed, M. R., and Schnepf, R. D.. “The Import Demand for U.S. Burley Tobacco in European Markets.” S. J. Agr. Econ. 14(1982): 141–145.Google Scholar
Shonkweiler, J. S., and Emerson, R. D.. “Impacts and the Supply of Winter Tomatoes: An Application of Rational Expectations.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 64(1982):634–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, R. W. “An Econometric Analysis of the Structure of the U.S. Tobacco Industry.” Ph.D. thesis, University of Kentucky, 1974.Google Scholar
Tobacco Tax Council. The Tax Burden on Tobacco, Historical Compilation. Vol. 16, Richmond, Va., 1981.Google Scholar
United Nations. Yearbook of Industrial Statistics. New York, various issues.Google Scholar
United Nations. Statistical Yearbook. New York, various issues.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Statistics. Washington, D.C., various issues.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Annual Report on Tobacco Statistics. Washington, D.C., various issues.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Tobacco Situation. Washington, D.C., various issues.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce. Statistical Abstract of the United States. Washington, D.C., various issues.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce. Historical Statistics of the United States: Colonial Times to 1970. Washington, D.C., 1972.Google Scholar