Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:05:33.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Estimating Returns to Agricultural Research, Extension, and Teaching at the State Level

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

George W. Norton ,
Joseph D. Coffey  and
E. Berrier Frye
George W. Norton
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Joseph D. Coffey
Affiliation:
Southern States Cooperative, Department of Agricultural Economics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
E. Berrier Frye
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maryland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The majority of decisions concerning investment and allocation of public funds for agricultural research, extension, and teaching (RET) are made at the state-level, while most of the quantitative RET evaluations are made on a national basis. This paper illustrates an approach for conducting a disaggregated state-level evaluation of agricultural research, extension, and teaching. Ridge regression is employed to handle multicollinearity problems.

Keywords

researchextensionteachingevaluationmulticollinearityridge regression
Type
Submitted Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , July 1984 , pp. 121 - 128
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Babb, E.M. and Pratt, J.E.. “Analysis of Agricultural Production, Research, and Extension Education at the Indiana Agricultural Experiment Station and the Indiana Cooperative Extension Service, 1964 to 1977.” Station Bulletin 205, Indiana Agricultural Experiment Station, October 1978.Google Scholar
Bellsey, D. A., Kuh, E. and Welsch, R. E.. Regression Diagnostics: Identify Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bredahl, Maury E. and Peterson, Willis L.. “The Productivity and Allocation of Research at U.S. Agricultural Experiment Stations,” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 58(1976): 684–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, William G. and Beattie, Bruce K.. “Improving Estimates of Economic Parameters by Use of Ridge Regression with Production Function Applications,” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 57(1975): 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cline, Philip L. and Lu, Yao-Chi. “Efficiency Aspects of the Spatial Allocation of Public Sector Agricultural Research and Extension in the United States.” Reg. Sci. Perspectives, 6(1976): 1–16.Google Scholar
Davis, Jeffrey S. “Stability of the Research Production Coefficient for U.S. Agriculture,” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Minnesota, 1979.Google Scholar
Evenson, Robert E. “A Century of Productivity Change in U.S. Agriculture: An Analysis of the Role of Invention, Research, and Education,” Econ. Growth Ctr. Disc. Pap. 296., Yale University, 1978.Google Scholar
Evenson, Robert. “Research Evaluation: Policy Interests and the State of the Art.” Evaluation of Agricultural Research eds. Norton, G. W., Fishel, W. L., Paulsen, A. A., and Sundquist, W. B.. Misc. Pub. 8-1981, Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station, April, 1981.Google Scholar
Evenson, Robert. “The Contribution of Agricultural Research to Production,” J. Farm Econ., 49(1967): 1415–1425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griliches, Zvi. “Research Expenditures, Education, and the Aggregate Agricultural Production Function,” Amer. Econ. Rev., 54(1964): 961–974.Google Scholar
Gunst, Richard F. and Mason, Robert L.. Regression Analysis and Its Application: A Data Oriented Approach, Marcel Deckker, Inc., New York, 1980.Google Scholar
Havlicek, Joseph Jr. and Otto, Daniel. “Historical Analysis of Investment in Food and Agricultural Research in the United States.” Report prepared for The Congress of the United States Office of Technology Assessment, January 1981.Google Scholar
Hoerl, A. E. and Kennard, R. W.. “Ridge Regression: Biased Estimation for Nonorthogonal Problems.” Technometrics, (1970): 55–82.Google Scholar
Huffman, Wallace and Evenson, Robert. “U.S. Agricultural Productivity and Public Policy: A Many Input-Many Output System.” Paper presented at the AAEA meetings, December, 1982.Google Scholar
Latimer, R. G. “Some Economic aspects of Agricultural Research and Education in the U.S.” Ph.D. thesis, Purdue University, 1964.Google Scholar
Melichar, Emanuel and Waldheger, Martha. Agricultural Finance Databook, Washington: Division of Research and Statistics, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, (various issues).Google Scholar
Montgomery, Douglas C. and Peck, Elizabeth A.. Linear Regression Analysis, John Wiley, New York, 1982.Google Scholar
Norton, George W. and Davis, Jeffrey S.. “Evaluating Returns to Agricultural Research: A Review.” Amer.J. Agr. Econ. 63(1981): 685–699.Google Scholar
Norton, George W. and Forkkio, John. “Trends in Research and Extension Funding and Agricultural Productivity in Virginia, 1964 to 1979,” A.E. 39, Dept. of Agr. Econ., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, March 1981.Google Scholar
Otto, Daniel M. “An Economic Assessment of Research and Extension Investments in Corn, Wheat, Soybeans, and Sorghum,” Ph.D. Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1981.Google Scholar
Shonkwiler, J. Scott and Emerson, Robert. “Imports and the Supply of Tomatoes: An Application of Rational Expectations.” Amer.J. Agr. Econ. 64(1982): 634–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shumway, C. Richard, Talpaz, Hovav, and Beattie, Bruce R.. “The Factor Share Approach to Production Function Estimation: Actual or Estimated Equilibrium Shares?” Amer.J. Agr. Econ., 61(1979): 561–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Council of Economic Advisers. Economic Report of the President, Washington: United States Government Printing Office, (various issues).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, (a) Agricultural Statistics, Washington: United States Government Printing Office, (various issues).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, (b) Balance Sheet of the Farming Sector, Washington: N.E.D., Economics, Statistics, and Cooperatives Service, (various issues).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, (c) Cooperative Extension Work in Agriculture and Home Economics, Federal Extension Service, (various issues).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, (d) Farm Labor, Washington: Crop Reporting Board, Economics, and Statistics Service, (various issues).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, (e) Farm Real Estate Market Developments, Washington: N.E.D., Economics, Statistics, and Cooperatives Service, (various issues).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, (f) Funds for Research at State Agricultural Experiment Stations and Other Cooperating Institutions, CSRS, (various issues).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, (g) Unpublished data on deviations from normal July precipitation for Virginia provided by Michael Weiss at USDA.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 1974 Census of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., 1977 (and earlier census).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce. Statistical Abstract of the United States. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of the Census, 85th-100th eds., 1964-1979.Google Scholar
Virginia Crop Reporting Service. Virginia Agricultural Statistics, Richmond, (various issues).Google Scholar
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, (a) Annual Financial Report (various years).Google Scholar
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, (b) Unpublished data provided by Vernon Boggs, Accountant, Virginia Agricultural Experiment Station.Google Scholar
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, (c) Unpublished data provided by Robert Swain, Extension Accountant, VPI and SU.Google Scholar
Weisberg, Sanford. Applied Linear Regression, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1980.Google Scholar
White, Fred C. and Joseph, Havlicek Jr.. “Interregional Spillover of Agricultural Research Results and Intergovernmental Finance: Some Preliminary Results,” Evaluation of Agricultural Research, eds. Norton, G. W., Fishel, W. L., Paulsen, A. A., and Sundquist, W. B.. Misc. Pub. 8, Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station, April 1981.Google Scholar