Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T21:22:23.311Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Estimating Implicit Marginal Prices of Quality Characteristics of Tomatoes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Jeffery L. Jordan ,
R. L. Shewfelt ,
S. E. Prussia  and
W. C. Hurst
Jeffery L. Jordan
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Georgia, Georgia Experiment Station
R. L. Shewfelt
Affiliation:
Department of Food Science, University of Georgia, Georgia Experiment Station
S. E. Prussia
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Engineering, University of Georgia, Georgia Experiment Station
W. C. Hurst
Affiliation:
Food Science Extension, University of Georgia, Athens
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A hedonic price function is developed for estimating the implicit prices for selected quality characteristics of fresh tomatoes at three points in the marketing season. The estimation of this function, proposed as a method of evaluating changes in the post-harvest system, is accomplished using a flexible functional form. Those quality characteristics that most affect the price of tomatoes can help determine the economic feasibility of alternative handling techniques or new technologies.

Keywords

hedonic price functionpost-harvest handlingquality characteristicsBox-Coxtomatoes
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , December 1985 , pp. 139 - 146
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bender, B., Gronberg, T. J., and Huang, H.. “Choice of Functional Form and Demand for Air Quality.” Rev. Econ. Stat., 62(1980):638–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackley, P., Follain, J. R. Jr., and Ondrich, J.. “Box-Cox Estimation of Hedonic Models: How Serious is the Iterative OLS Variance Bias?” Rev. Econ. Stat., 66(1984):348–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Box, G. E. P. and Cox, D. R.. “Analysis of Transformations.” J. Royal Stat. Soc, Series B, 26(1964):211–243.Google Scholar
Boyes, W. J. and Gerking, S. D.. “A Liquidity Trap in the Foreign Exchange Market: The Case of Mexico.” Int'l Econ. Rev., 19(1978):777–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceponis, M. J. and Butterfield, J. E.. “Losses in Fresh Tomatoes at the Retail and Consumer Levels in the Greater New York Area.” J. Amer. Soc. HortScience, 104(1979):75175–4.Google Scholar
Clayton, J. E. “Shipping, Handling and ‘T.L.C’.” USDA Yearbook, 1966, pp. 118–122.Google Scholar
Edwards, S. R. and Anderson, G. D.. “Land Use Conflicts in the Coastal Zone: An Approach for the Analysis of the Opportunity Costs of Protecting Coastal Resources.” J. Northeastern Agr. Econ. Council, 13(1984):73–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griliches, Z. “Introduction: Hedonic Price Indexes Revisited.” Griliches, Z., (ed.), Price Indexes and Quality Change. Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halvorsen, R. and Pollakowski, H. O.. “Choice of Functional Form for Hedonic Price Equations.” J. Urban Econ., 10(1981):37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanna, M. A. and Mohsenin, N. N.. 1971. “Pack-handling of Apples.” J. Agr. Eng. Res., 17(1972):154–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houthakker, H. S. “Compensated Changes in Quantities and Qualities Consumed.” Rev. >Econ. Stud., 19(1952):155–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Chung-Liang. “Estimating U.S. Demand for Meat with A Flexible Functional Form.” So. J. Agr. Econ., 11,2(1979):17–20.Google Scholar
Kader, A. “Postharvest Biology and Technology of Horticultural Crops: An Overview.” Postharvest Technology of Horticultural Crops. University of California, Davis, 1984.Google Scholar
Ladd, G. W. “Survey of Promising Developments in Demand Analysis: Economics of Product Characteristics.” Rausser, G. C., (ed.), New Directions in Econometric Modeling and Forecasting in U.S. Agriculture. New York: North Holland, 1982, pp. 17–54.Google Scholar
Ladd, G. W. and Martin, M. B.. “Prices and Demands for Input Characteristics.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 58(1976):21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladd, G. W. and Suvannunt, V.. “A Model of Consumer Goods Characteristics.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 58(1976):504–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancaster, K. “A New Approach to Consumer Theory.” J. Polit. Econ., 74(1966):132–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, R. E. B. “Hedonic Price Functions.” Econ. Inquiry. 13(1975):157–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milon, J. W., Gressel, J., and Mulkey, D.. “Hedonic Amenity Valuation and Functional Form Specification.” Land Econ., 6(1984):378–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mongelli, R. C. “A Comparison of Handling Systems for Fresh Tomatoes from Packing Plant to Retail Store.” USDA, AMS, MRR-111; 1980.Google Scholar
O'Brien, M., Paasch, R. K., and Garrett, R. E.. “Fillers for Fruit and Vegetable Damage Reduction.” Trans. Amer. Soc. Agr. Engr., 23(1980):71–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, T. R., Allen, J. W., and McLaughlin, E. W.. “Produce Losses.” Agr. Econ. Rep. 422, Michigan State University, 1982.Google Scholar
Rosen, S. “Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition.” J. Political Econ., 82(1974):34–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schueller, J. K., Krutz, G. W., Thompson, L. J., and Johnson, P. E.. “Tomato Transport: Air Cushion Vehicle Design and Development.” Trans. Amer. Soc. Agr. Engr., 23(1980):802–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spitzer, J. “The Demand for Money, The Liquidity Trap, and Functional Forms.” Int'l Econ. Rev., 17(1976):220–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spitzer, J. “Variance Estimates in Models with the Box-Cox Transformation: Implications for Estimation and Hypothesis Testing.” Rev. Econ. Stat., 66(1984):645–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theil, H. “Qualities, Prices, and Budget Inquiries.” Rev. Econ. Stud., 19(1952):129–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. “Losses in Agriculture.” USDA Handbook, No. 291, 1965.Google Scholar
Waugh, F. V. “Quality Factors Influencing Vegetable Prices.” J. Farm Econ., 19(1928):185–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiland, J. D. “Cognitive Abilities, Schooling and Earnings: The Question of Functional Form.” Rev. Econ. Stat., 60(1978):622–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, W. W. “Hedonic Prices in the Malting Barley Market.” Western J. Agr. Econ., 9(1984):29–40.Google Scholar
Zarembka, P. “Transformation of Variables in Econometrics.” Zarembka, P., (ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics. New York: Academic Press, 1974, pp. 81–104.Google Scholar