Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:16:34.703Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Japanese Import Demand on U.S. Livestock Prices: Comment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Henry W. Kinnucan*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Auburn University, AL

Abstract

A recent study by Miljkovic, Marsh, and Brester estimates that reductions in the Japanese tariff-rate quota between 1993 and 2001 increased U.S. beef prices by $1.03 per cwt and yen depreciation between 1995 and 1998 reduced U.S. hog prices by $0.99 per cwt. Relaxing the assumption that U.S. beef and hog supplies are fixed cuts the total elasticities underlying these estimates by 50% or more. The upshot is that shocks in the Japanese market have little effect on U.S. beef and pork prices. Hence, producers may be better off focusing on domestic issues such as dietary concerns over red meat consumption.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Buhr, B.L., and Kim, H.. “Dynamic Adjustment in Vertically Linked Markets: The Case of the U.S. Beef Industry.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79(1997):126–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, R.G., and Just, R.E.. “A Critique of Exchange Rate Treatment in Agricultural Trade Models.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 61 (1979):249–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, R.G., “Effects of Exchange Rate Changes on U.S. Agriculture: A Dynamic Analysis.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 63(1981):3246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutton, J., and Grennes, T.. “The Role of Exchange Rates in Trade Models.” Elasticities in International Agricultural Trade. Carter, C.A. and Gardiner, W.H., eds., pp. 87136. Boulder and London: Westview Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Holt, M.T., and Moschini, G.. “Alternative Measures of Risk in Commodity Supply Models: An Analysis of Sow Farrowing Decisions in the United States.Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 17(1992):112.Google Scholar
Kinnucan, H.W., Xiao, H., Hsia, C.-H., and Jackson, J.D.. “Effects of Health Information and Generic Advertising on U.S. Meat Demand.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79(1997):1323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemieux, CM., and Wohlgenant, M.K.. “£x Ante Evaluation of the Economic Impact of Agricultural Biotechnology: The Case of Porcine Somatotropin.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71(1989):903–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, J.M.Estimating Intertemporal Supply Response in the Fed Beef Market.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76(1994):5166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miljkovic, D., Marsh, J.M., and Brester, G.W.. “Japanese Import Demand for U.S. Beef and Pork: Effects on U.S. Red Meat Exports and Livestock Prices.Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 34(2002):501–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarmiento, C, and Allen, P.G.. “Dynamics of Beef Supply in the Presence of Cointegration: A New Test of the Backward-Bending Hypothesis.Review of Agricultural Economics 22(2000):421–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wohlgenant, M.K.Distribution of Gains from Research and Promotion in Multi-Stage Production Systems: The Case of U.S. Beef and Pork Industries.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75(1993):642–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar