Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T19:35:38.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effect of Increasing Transportation Costs on Florida's Cattle Feeding Industry: An Extension Application

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

James R. Simpson
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Forrest E. Stegelin
Affiliation:
University of Florida

Extract

Rapid fuel price increases in 1979 and early 1980, along with concern about further rises, have led to speculation that Florida, a net calf exporter but net importer of finished cattle and beef, will be increasingly competitive in finishing cattle to slaughter weight. This hypothesis is strengthened by recognition of significant structural changes in the Florida cattle feeding industry since the late 1960s, as large-scale feedlots were developed and smaller-scale feeders declined in importance (Simpson and Baker). Furthermore, yield improvements and new techniques, such as the use of bagasse for silage and feeding of high-moisture corn, have been adopted in the production of Florida feedstuff s. There is no crucial evidence showing differences in investment or operating costs between Florida and the major cattle feeding areas because of the relatively large size feedlots in Florida that allow them to take advantage of substantial economies of size (Simpson, et al.). This paper evaluates the potential effect that increased transportation costs, as a result of higher fuel prices, might have on Florida's competitive cattle feeding position.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aylor, F. I. and Juillerat, M. E.Least Cost Movement Analysis of Slaughter Cattle and Calves with Emphasis on the Southeast. Southern Cooperative Ser. Bull. 133, January 1968.Google Scholar
Browser, Max F. and Goodwin, John W.Optimum Distribution Patterns for Feeder Cattle. Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Tech. Bull. T-123, June 1968.Google Scholar
Carmon, Hoy F.California's Competitive Position in Cattle Feeding and Poultry: A Review of Interregional Competition Studies. No. 72-1, Giannini Foundation of Agr., University of California, Berkeley, October 1972.Google Scholar
Dietrich, Raymond A.Interregional Competition in the Cattle Feeding Economy. Texas A&M University, College Station, Bull. B-1115, September 1971.Google Scholar
Florida Crop and Livestock Reporting Service. Florida Agricultural Statistics: Livestock Summary 1979, Orlando, 1980.Google Scholar
Gold Kist, Live Oak, Florida Mill, personal communication, 1980.Google Scholar
Goodwin, John W. and Richard, J. Crom. Optimal Regional Locations of Beef Production and Processing Enterprises. Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Bull. B-707, July 1973.Google Scholar
Heady, Earl O. and Srivastava, Urna K.Spatial Sector Programming Models in Agriculture. Iowa State University Press, Ames, 1975.Google Scholar
King, G. A. and Schrader, L. F.Regional Location of Cattle Feeding—A Spatial Equilibrium Analysis.Hilgardia 34(1963):331416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Charles Y. and West, Donald A.A Spatial Analysis of Beef Feeding and Slaughtering with Emphasis on the South. Southern Cooperative Ser., Bull. 716, 1973.Google Scholar
Mallett, James I.Spatial Equilibrium and Regional Development.” Contributed Paper, 1977 AAEA Annual Meeting; Texas A&M Agr. Exp. Sta., Technical Article TA-9989, 1972.Google Scholar
Malphrus, L. D., Liu, C. Y. and Freund, R. J.Cattle and Calf Movement in the South. Southern Cooperative Ser., Bull. 134, March 1968.Google Scholar
Simpson, James R.Cattle Cycles: A Guide for Florida Cattlemen.Florida Cattleman 43(1979):46-48, 54, 57, 77, 84B.Google Scholar
Simpson, James R. and Baker, F. S. Jr. Structural and Operational Characteristics of the Florida Cattle Feeding Industry. Florida Coop. Ext. Ser., Gainesville, Ext. Cir. 493, 1981.Google Scholar
Simpson, James R., Baldwin, L. B. and Baker, F. S. Jr.Investment and Operating Costs for Two Types and Three Sizes of Florida Feedlots. University of Florida, Gainesville, Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull. 817, January 1981.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Operations for For-Hire Livestock Trucking Firms. Washington, D.C.: AER No. 342, 1976.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Transportation Fuel Requirements in the Food and Fiber System. Washington, D.C.: AER No. 444, 1980.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Cost of Operating Trucks for Livestock Transportation. Washington, D.C.: MRP No. 982, 1973.Google Scholar
Williams, Willard F. and Dietrich, Raymond A.An Interregional Analysis of the Fed Beef Economy. Washington, D.C.: Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agr. Econ. Rpt. No. 88, April 1966.Google Scholar