Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T05:23:33.448Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economies of Capacity Use in Decontamination of Pig Carcasses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

Jørgen Dejgård Jensen ,
Lartey Godwin Lawson  and
Mogens Lund
Jørgen Dejgård Jensen
Affiliation:
Institute of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Lartey Godwin Lawson
Affiliation:
Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Business, Management University of Aalborg, Aalborg, Denmark
Mogens Lund
Affiliation:
Institute of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This article analyzes the economies of capacity use regarding hot water decontamination to reduce postslaughter risk of pathogens in meat, taking interfarm heterogeneities of Salmonella risk and costs of transportation into account, using Denmark as a case study. If risk reduction goals are stated at the processing plant level, then the exploitation of the favorable cost-effectiveness properties of hot water slaughtering requires fairly ambitious risk reduction goals and thus high use of decontamination capacity. If instead risk reduction goals are formulated for the sector as a whole, the cost-effectiveness properties can be exploited even for relatively low-risk reduction goals.

Keywords

capacity usedecontaminationcostsspatial economicsD24Q13R12
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , February 2013 , pp. 125 - 138
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous. “Regulation (EC) No. 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of April 29, 2004 Laying down Specific Hygiene Rules for Food of Animal Origin.” 2004.Google Scholar
Aymerich, T., Picouet, P.A., and Monfort, J.M.. “Decontamination Technologies for Meat Products.” Meat Science 78(2008):114–29.10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.07.00722062101Google Scholar
Bergevoet, R.H.M., Schaik, G.v., Veiling, J., Backus, G.B.C., and Franken, P.. “Economic and Epidemiological Evaluation of Salmonella Control in Dutch Dairy Herds.” Preventive Veterinary Medicine 89(2009):1–7.10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.12.00719201499Google Scholar
Bollaerts, K., Aerts, M., Ribbens, S., van der Stede, Y. Boone, I., and Mintiens, K.. “Identification of Salmonella High Risk Pig-herds in Belgium by Using Semiparametric Quantile Regression.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, (Statistics in Society) 171,2(2008):449–64.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2007.00525.xGoogle Scholar
Bowling, S.R., Khasawneh, M.T., Kaewkuekool, S., and Cho, B.R.. “A Logistic Approximation to the Cumulative Normal Distribution.” Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management 2,1(2009):114–27.Google Scholar
Danish Food Agency. “Salmonella Action Plan for Pigs 2009-2013.” (Fødevarestyrelsen, Salmonellahandlingsplan—svin 2009-2013), 2009. Internet site: www.foedevarestyrelsen.dk/SiteCollectionDocuments/25_PDF_word_filer% 20til%20download/04kontor/Salmonellahandling splanTVtilpdf.pdf (Accessed November 2011).Google Scholar
De Vos, C.J., Saatkamp, H.W., and Ehlers, J.. “Simulation Evaluation of Salmonella Monitoring in Finishing Pigs in Lower Saxony, Germany.” Preventive Veterinary Medicine 82(2007):123–37.10.1016/j.prevetmed.2007.05.00917614149Google Scholar
Danish Ministry of Transports and Energy. “Key Figures to be Used for Socio-economic Analysis Regarding Transports, December 2004, Revised June 2006.” (Transport- og Energiministeriet: Nø0gletalskatalog-til brag for samfundsøkonomiske analyser på transportområdet, December 2004, revideret juni 2006). 2006. Internet site: http://www.trm.dk/~/media/Files/Publication/2006/Noegletalskatalog_rev_feb_2006.ashx (Accessed November 2011).Google Scholar
Goldbach, S.G., and Alban, L.. “A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Salmonella-Control Strategies in Danish Pork Production.” Preventive Veterinary Medicine 77(2006):1–14.10.1016/j.prevetmed.2005.10.00816879887Google Scholar
Jensen, H.H., and Unnevehr, L.J.. “HACCP in Pork Processing: Costs and Benefits.” The Economics of HACCP—Costs and Benefits. Unnevehr, L.J., ed. St. Paul, MN: Eagan Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Jensen, H.H., Unnevehr, L.J., and Gomez, M.I.. “Costs of Improving Food Safety in the Meat Sector.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 30,1(1998):83–94.Google Scholar
Jensen, T., and Christensen, H.. “Dekontaminering af Svinek0d. Dokumentation af Effekt ved Unders0gelser pâ Slagtergangen” in Danish (Decontamination of Pork, Documentation of Effect through Investigations in the Processing Plant). Work No 18.361, Report of the 23rd August. Roskilde, Denmark: Danish Meat Research Institute, 2000.Google Scholar
Krak Company and Search Engine. Internet site: www.krak.dk (Accessed July 2008).Google Scholar
Lawson, L.G., Jensen, J.D., Christiansen, P., and Lund, M.. “Cost-effectiveness of Salmonella Reduction in Danish Abattoirs.” International Journal of Food Microbiology 134,1-2(2009):126–32.10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.03.02419427047Google Scholar
Malcolm, S.A., Narrad, C.A., Roberts, T., and Ollinger, M.. “Evaluating the Economic Effectiveness of Pathogen Reduction Technologies in Cattle Slaughter Plants.” Agribusiness 20, 1(2004):109–23.10.1002/agr.10080Google Scholar
Martin, L.L. “Production Contracts, Risk Shifting, and Relative Performance Payments in the Pork Industry.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 29,2(1997):267–78.Google Scholar
Nelson, R.A. “On the Measurement of Capacity Utilization.” The Journal of Industrial Economics 37,3(1989):273–86.10.2307/2098615Google Scholar
Nielsen, B., Alban, L., Sørensen, L.L. Møgelmose, V. Bagger, J. Dahl, J., and Baggesen, D.L.. “A New Salmonella Surveillance and Control Programme in Danish Pig Herds and Slaughterhouses.” Berliner und Munchener Tierarztliche Wochenschrift 114(2001):323–26.11570168Google Scholar
Nielsen, B., Dahl, J., Goldbach, S.G., and Christensen, H.. “Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Danish Salmonella Control Strategy.” 6th International Symposium: Safe Pork USA (2005):83–85.Google Scholar
Poljak, Z.C., Dewey, E., Friendship, R.M., Martin, S.W., and Christensen, J.. “Multilevel Analysis of Risk Factors for Salmonella Shedding in Ontario Finishing Pigs.” Epidemiology and Infection 136(2008):1388–400.18047752Google Scholar
Unnevehr, L.J., and Jensen, H.H.. “The Economic Implication of Using HACCP as a Food Safety Regulatory Standard.” Food Policy 24,6(1999):625–35.10.1016/S0306-9192(99)00074-3Google Scholar
van der Gaag, M.A., Saatkamp, H.W. Backus, G.B.C. van Beek, P., and Huirne, R.B.M.. “Cost-Effectiveness of Controlling Salmonella in the Pork Chain.” Food Control 15(2004):173–80.10.1016/S0956-7135(03)00029-XGoogle Scholar
Veerle, H., Verbeke, G., Vandebroeck, M., and Geers, R.. “Development of a Sanitary Risk Index for Salmonella Seroprevalence in Belgian Pig Farms.” Preventive Veterinary Medicine 86(2008):75–92.10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.03.00518453017Google Scholar
Vosough, A.B., Velthuis, A.G.J., Hogenveen, H., and Huirne, R.B.M.. “Cost-Effectiveness of Beef Slaughterhouse Decontamination Measures in The Netherlands.” Food Economics 3,3/4(2006):161–73.Google Scholar