Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:03:46.898Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economic Impacts of Chemical Use Reduction on the South

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2017

C. Robert Taylor ,
John B. Penson Jr. ,
Edward G. Smith  and
Ronald D. Knutson
C. Robert Taylor
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Public Policy, Auburn University
John B. Penson Jr.
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University
Edward G. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University
Ronald D. Knutson
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A growing segment of society is concerned about a myriad of health and environmental issues related to the use of pesticides and other agricultural chemicals. Despite the leveling-off of agricultural chemical use in the 1980s, chemical use in agriculture has come to be seen as a two-edged sword. On the positive side, agricultural chemicals have become the engine for world-wide productivity gains. These chemicals have contributed to increased yields per acre and have reduced waste in storage and distribution. On the negative side, agricultural chemicals are perceived by many to present risks to the safety of the food we eat, to the quality of our drinking water, to the wildlife population, to applicators and to people who inadvertently come into point contact with them.

Type
Invited Papers and Discussions
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , July 1991 , pp. 15 - 23
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Knutson, R.D., Taylor, C.R., Penson, J.B. Jr., and Smith, E.G., Economic Impacts of Reduced Chemical Use. College Station, TX: Knutson and Associates, 1990.Google Scholar
Nielsen, E.G., and Lee, L.K.. The Magnitude and Costs of Groundwater Contamination From Agricultural Chemicals: A Nation Perspective. USDA/ERS Agr. Econ. Rpt. No. 576, Oct., 1987.Google Scholar
Osteen, C, and Kuchler, E. Potential Bans of Corn and Soybean Pesticides: Economic Implications For Farmers and Consumers. USDA/ERS Agr. Econ. Rpt. No. 546, April 1986.Google Scholar
Peel, Derrell S. An Econometric Model of the U.S. Livestock Industry. Staff Paper ES89-4, Dep. Agr. Econ. and Rural Soc., Auburn University, July 1989.Google Scholar
Penson, John B. Jr., and Robert Taylor, C.. Modeling the Interface Between Agriculture and the General Economy. Agricultural and Food Policy Center (AFPC) Policy Working Paper No. 90-13, Dep. Agr. Econ., Texas A&M University, Oct., 1990.Google Scholar
Sirkin, Gerald. “The Green Lobby's Dirty Tricks.” Wall Street Journal. January 2,1991.Google Scholar
Smith, E.G., Knutson, R.D., Taylor, C.R., and Penson, J.B. Jr. Impacts of Chemical Use Reduction on Crop Yields and Costs. Tennessee Valley Authority and Texas A&M University System Cooperating, May, 1990.Google Scholar
Swanson, E.R., and Taylor, C.R.. “Nitrogen Fertilizer and Water Quality,” Agricultural and Resource Policy Forum, Vol. 1, No. 3, Auburn University College of Agriculture, September 1989.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. Robert. “A Description of AGSIM: An Fxonometric-Simulation Model and Regional Crop and National Livestock Production in the United States.” U.S. Agricultural Sector Models: Description and Selected Policy Applications, Taylor, C.R., Johnson, S.R. and Reichelderfer, K.H., eds. Iowa State University Press, in press.Google Scholar
Taylor, C.R., and Penson, J.B. Jr. Estimates of the Aggregate Economic Impacts of Pesticide Regulatory Options to Control Residues in Groundwater. Dpt. Agr. Econ. and Rural Soc., Auburn University, Staff Paper ES90-1, January 1990.Google Scholar
U.S.Department of Agriculture, Pesticide Assessment of Field Corn and Soybeans: Delta States: National Agricultural Pesticide Impact Assessment Program. USDAERS Staff Rpt. No. AGES850524B, December 1985a.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Pesticide Assessment of Field Corn and Soybeans: Southeastern States: National Agricultural Pesticide Impact Assessment Program. USDAERS Staff Rpt. No. AGES850524F, December 1985b.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. “First National Survey of Drinking Water Wells Shows Some Contamination by Pesticides and Nitrates,” EPA Environmental News, Tuesday, Nov. 13,1990.Google Scholar