Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T17:00:42.556Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Econometric Forecasting of Irrigation Water Demand Conserves aValuable Natural Resource

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

Swagata “Ban” Banerjee
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture at the University of Wisconsin-Platteville, Platteville, Wisconsin
Babatunde A. Obembe
Affiliation:
Agribusiness at Alabama A&M University, Normal, Alabama

Extract

Natural causes (such as droughts), non-natural causes (such as competinguses), and government policies limit the supply of water for agriculture ingeneral and irrigating crops in particular. Under such reduced water supplyscenarios, existing physical models reduce irrigation proportionally amongcrops in the farmer's portfolio, disregarding temporal changes in economicand/or institutional conditions. Hence, changes in crop mix resulting fromexpectations about risks and returns are ignored. A method is developed thatconsiders those changes and accounts for economic substitution and expansioneffects. Forecasting studies based on this method with surface water inGeorgia and Alabama demonstrate the relative strength of econometricmodeling vis-à-vis physical methods. Results from a study using this methodfor ground water in Mississippi verify the robustness of those findings.Results from policy-induced simulation scenarios indicate water savings of12% to 27% using the innovative method developed. Although better irrigationwater demand forecasting in crop production was the key objective of thispilot project, conservation of a valuable natural resource (water) hasturned out to be a key consequence.

Type
Session Title: Assistant Professor Leadership Award Winners' Invited Paper Series
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Banerjee, S.B. Multiproduct Rational Expectations Forecasting of Irrigation Water Demand: An Application to the Flint River Basin in Georgia. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, The University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, 2004.Google Scholar
Banerjee, S.B., and Obembe, B.A.. “Towards Robust Forecasting of Demand for Water in Crop Production.Journal of Management Research in Emerging Economies 2(2012):3649.Google Scholar
Banerjee, S.B., Tareen, I.Y., Gunter, L.F., Bramblett, J., and Wetzstein, M.E.. “Forecasting Irrigation Water Demand: A Case Study on the Flint River Basin in Georgia.Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 39(2007):641-55.Google Scholar
Bohrnstedt, G.W., and Goldberger, A.S.. “On the Exact Covariance of Products of Random Variables.Journal of the American Statistical Association 64(1969):1439-42.10.1080/01621459.1969.10501069Google Scholar
Chavas, J.-P, Pope, R.D., and Kao, R.S.. “An Analysis of the Role of Futures Prices, Cash Prices, and Government Programs in Acreage Response.Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 8(1983):2733.Google Scholar
Choi, J.S., and Helmberger, P.G.. “Acreage Response, Expected Price Functions, and Endogenous Price Expectations.Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 18(1993):3746.Google Scholar
Commodity Research Bureau. CRB InfoTech CD—Futures, 2007.Google Scholar
Eales, J.S., Engel, B.K., Hauser, R.J., and Thompson, S.R.. “Grain Price Expectations of Illinois Farmers and Grain Merchandisers.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72(1990):701708.10.2307/1243040Google Scholar
Flint River Drought Protection Act (FRDPA). House Resolution 17. Georgia General Assembly, 2001.Google Scholar
Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI), Commodity Price Projections, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD), Iowa State University. Internet site: www.fapri.org/Outlook2001/Tables/CPrices.xls (Accessed December 9, 2012).Google Scholar
Gardner, B.L.Futures Prices in Supply Analysis.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 58(1976):8184.10.2307/1238581Google Scholar
Georgia Environmental Protection Division (EPD). Atlanta, GA: Geological Survey Branch, 2001.Google Scholar
Greene, W.H. Econometric Analysis. 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc., 1997.Google Scholar
Holt, M.T.A Linear Approximate Acreage Allocation Model.Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 24(1999):383-97.Google Scholar
Tareen, I.Y. Forecasting Irrigation Water Demand: An Application to the Flint River Basin. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, The University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, 2001.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service (USDA-ERS). Briefing Room Farm Income and Costs: Commodity Costs and Returns. Internet site: www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/farmincome/costsandreturns.htm (Accessed December 9, 2012).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service (USDA-NASS). Internet site: www.usda.gov/nass/ (Accessed December 9, 2012).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS). “ACT/ ACF River Basins Comprehensive Study: Agricultural Water Demand.” 1995.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service (USDA-SCS), Engineering Division. “Irrigation Water Requirements: Technical Release No. 21.” April 1967, revised September 1970.Google Scholar
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 2012a. Internet site: http://al.water.usgs.gov/ (Accessed December 9, 2012).Google Scholar
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 2012b. Internet site: http://ms.water.usgs.gov/ms_proj/eric/delta/index.html (Accessed December 9, 2012b).Google Scholar
Yazoo Mississippi Delta Joint Water Management District. 2012. Internet site: www.ymd.org/ (Accessed December 9, 2012).Google Scholar