Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T01:58:25.097Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diversity of Sources for Fresh Produce: Implications for Local Markets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Luanne Lohr  and
Steven D. Hanson
Luanne Lohr
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Georgia
Steven D. Hanson
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Georgia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Number of suppliers, approximation of equal-shares market condition and market share held by in-state sources were calculated to determine diversity of sources for 10 fresh fruits and vegetables in eight U.S. wholesale markets. Specificity of growing conditions is associated with few supply sources, unequal market shares and limited purchases from in-state suppliers. For crops with few sources, lower perishability and greater transportability are correlated with greater balance in market shares. For crops with many supply sources, greater perishability and greater transportability are consistent with large market share from imports. Diversity across all commodities can increase market share for local producers.

Keywords

concentration indexfruits and vegetablessource diversity
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , December 1995 , pp. 510 - 521
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bacon, J. R., and C.M., Gempesaw. “Surplus and Deficit Regions in Fruit and Vegetable Production.” Produce Marketing Association Yearbook 1988. Newark, NJ: Produce Marketing Association, 1988. pp. 137–150.Google Scholar
Coupe, K. “Consumers Get Fresh With Local Produce.” Supermarket Bus. 43(March, 1988):23–28, 108.Google Scholar
Friedland, W. H. “The Global Fresh Fruit and Vegetable System: An Industrial Organization Analysis,” in P. McMichael, ed., The Global Restructuring of Agro-Food Systems. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1994. pp. 173–189.Google Scholar
Gussow, J.D., “Food Security in the United States: A Nutritionist&s Viewpoint,” in Busch, L. and Lacy, W. B., eds., Food Security in the United States. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1984. pp. 207–230.Google Scholar
Hannah, L., and Kay, J. A.. Concentration in Modern Industry - Theory, Measurement and the U.K. Experience. London: MacMiUan Press, Ltd, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
How, R.B.Marketing Fresh Fruits and Vegetables. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Litwak, D., and Cepeda, J. T.. “1991 Produce Operations Review.” Supermarket Bus. 46(October, 1991):41–49.Google Scholar
Litwak, D., and Maline, N.. “Fifth Annual Produce Department Operations Review.” Supermarket Bus. 47(October, 1992):35–42.Google Scholar
Magurran, A. E.Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClure, B.S. “A New Marketing Force for Produce: State Department of Agriculture Promotion Programs.” Supermarket Bus. 43(August, 1988):50–51.Google Scholar
Stimmann, M. W., and Melnicoe, R.. “Delaney Clause Ruling May Trigger Pesticide Cancellations.” Cal. Agr. 48(January-February, 1994):30–35.Google Scholar
Tauer, L. W. “Diversification of Production Agriculture Across Individual States.”J. Prod. Agr. 5(1992):210–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Packer. Fresh Trends 1992 - A Profile of Fresh Produce Consumers. 1992. pp. 20, 24.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Arrivals in Eastern Cities - By Commodities, States and Months, FVAS-1 Calendar Year 1990. Market News Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Division, Agricultural Marketing Service, Washington, DC, 1991a.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Arrivals in Western Cities - By Commodities, States and Months, FVAS-2 Calendar Year 1990. Market News Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Division, Agricultural Marketing Service, Washington, DC, 1991b.Google Scholar
Weimar, M. R., and Hallam, A.. “Risk, Diversification, and Vegetables as an Alternative Crop for Midwestern Agriculture.” N. Cent. J. Agr. Econ. 10(1988):75–90.Google Scholar