Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T04:34:58.522Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discussion: Valuation of Crop and Livestock Reports: Methodological Issues and Questions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Ken Schneeberger
Ken Schneeberger*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Missouri, Columbia, on leave to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Cooperative Service, Washington, D.C.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , July 1982 , pp. 21 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baquet, A. E., Halter, A. N., and Conklin, F. C.. “The Value of Frost Forecasting: A Bayesian Approach.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 58(1976):511–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullock J., Bruce. “Social Costs Caused by Errors in Agricultural Production Forecast.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 58(1976):76–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullock J., Bruce. “Some Concepts for Measuring the Economic Value of Rural Data.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 63(1981):346–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayami, Y. and Peterson, W.. “Social Returns to Public Information Services: Statistical Reporting of U.S. Farm Commodities.” Amer. Econ. Rev. 62(1972): 119–30.Google Scholar
Mann, J. S. “Techniques to Measure Social Benefits and Costs in Agriculture: A Survey.” Agr. Econ. Res. 29(1977): 115–26.Google Scholar