Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:48:33.333Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discussion: Future Domestic and International Competitiveness ofthe Southern Fruit and Vegetable Industry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

Esendugue G. Fonsah  and
Sebastain Nde Awondo
Esendugue G. Fonsah
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Georgia, Tifton, Georgia
Sebastain Nde Awondo
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Remarkable changes have occurred over the years in the domestic andinternational economic environment of the fruit and vegetable industry.These changes are partly driven by the North American Free Trade Agreement,nutrition policies, and development and enforcement of new food safetystandards. The articles in this invited session examined the effect of thesedrivers and their implication on the future competitiveness of the southernfruit and vegetable industry.

Keywords

food safetyfruits and vegetablesimport demandLGMAstructural changessupply responseFl4Q11Q13Q17
Type
Session Title: Future Domestic and International Competitiveness of the Southern Fruit and Vegetable Industry
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 45 , Issue 3 , August 2013 , pp. 481 - 484
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Paggi, M.S., Yamazaki, F., Ribera, L., Palma, M., and Knutson, R.. “Domestic and Trade Implications of Leafy Green Marketing Agreement: Type, Policies, and the Food Safety Modernization Act for the Southern Produce Industry.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 45,3(2013):453-64.Google Scholar
Palma, M.A., Ribera, L.A., and Bessler, D.. “Implications of U.S. Trade Agreements and U.S. Nutrition Policies for Produce Production, Demand, and Trade.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 45,3(2013):465-80.Google Scholar
Seale, J.L., Zhang, L., and Traboulsi, M.R.. “U.S. Import Demand and Supply Response for Fresh Tomatoes, Cantaloupes, Onions, Oranges, and Spinach.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 45,3(2013):435-52.Google Scholar
Tshikala, S.K., and Fonsah, E.G.. “Estimating the U.S Import Demand for Melons: A Dynamic Analysis Approach.” Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing 24(2012):306-20.10.1080/08974438.2012.716332Google Scholar
USDA-NASS. Fruits and Vegetables Crops Statistics and National Rankings 2010. USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service, 2011. Internet site: http://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_State/New_Jersey/Current_Releases/2010%20NJ%20Fruit&Veg%20Rankings%20book.pdf.Google Scholar
VanSickle, J.J., Evans, E.A., and Emerson, R.D.. “U.S.-Canadian Tomato Wars: An Economist Tries to Make Sense Out Of Recent Antidumping Suits.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 35(2003):283-96.Google Scholar
Zahniser, S., Hertz, T., Dixon, P., and Rimmer, M.. “Immigration Policy and its Possible Effects on U.S. Agriculture and the Market for Hired Farm Labor: A Simulation Analysis.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 94(2012):477-82.10.1093/ajae/aar082Google Scholar