Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T13:35:00.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Did the 1995 Farm Bill Address the Critical Issues? Discussion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Larry Salathe
Larry Salathe*
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In 1995, for the first time since the 1930s, the United States failed to pass new farm program legislation. The inability to pass farm legislation occurred despite bipartisan agreement that farm programs should continue the trend over the past decade of less government intervention. This paper discusses the sequence of events, the role of agricultural economists, the major issues, and the lessons learned from the 1995 Farm Bill debate. The trend toward declining government intervention in agriculture will require that the profession look increasingly to the private sector for solutions to the problems facing agriculture in the twenty-first century.

Keywords

agricultural policycongressional debateequityfarm programspolicy analysisprice and income support
Type
Invited Paper Sessions
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , July 1996 , pp. 45 - 51
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural and Food Policy Center. “Aggregate and Representative Farm Impacts Resulting from Extending the 1990 Farm Bill, Program Elimination, and Marketing Loan Scenarios.” AFPC Policy Briefing Series 95-4, Texas A&M University, April 1995.Google Scholar
Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute. “25 Percent Normal Flex Acreage Program Analysis.” FAPRI Policy Work. Pap. No. 1-95, University of Missouri-Columbia and Iowa State University, January 1995a.Google Scholar
Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute. “1995 Farm Bill Option: The Freedom to Farm Act and 30 Percent Normal Flex Acres.” FAPRI Rep. No. 13-95, University of Missouri-Columbia and Iowa State University, September 1995b.Google Scholar
Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute. “U.S. Agricultural Outlook: November 1995 Preliminary Baseline.” FAPRI Special Rep., University of Missouri-Columbia and Iowa State University, November 1995c.Google Scholar
Frydenlund, J. E. Spokesperson for the Heritage Foundation. Testimony before the House Small Business Subcommittee on Procurement, Exports, and Business Opportunities. Washington DC, 17 May 1995.Google Scholar
General Accounting Office. “Cotton Program: Costly and Complex Government Program Needs to Be Reassessed.” Pub. No. GAO/RCED-95-107, Washington DC, June 1995.Google Scholar
General Accounting Office. “Rice Program: Government Support Needs to Be Reassessed.” Pub. No. GAO/RCED-94-88, Washington DC, May 1994.Google Scholar
Glickman, D. Statement before the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington DC, 13 June 1995.Google Scholar
Hathaway, D., Cochrane, W., Johnson, D. G., Gardner, B., Paariburg, D., Tweeten, L., and others. Letter to the President of the United States (in support of the Agricultural Market Transition Act), 13 December 1995.Google Scholar
Miller, J. C. Spokesperson for the Coalition for a Competitive Food and Agricultural System. Statement before the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry. Hearing entitled “Farm Programs: Are Americans Getting What They Pay For?” Washington DC, 9 March 1995.Google Scholar
Runge, C. F., Schnittker, J. A., and Penny, T.. “Ending Entitlements: How to Fix Farm Policy.” Special Rep., the Progressive Foundation, Washington DC, May 1995.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. “1995 Farm Bill: Guidance of the Administration.” Special Rep., Washington DC, April 1995.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Backgroundfor 1995 Farm Legislation. Agr. Econ. Rep. Nos. 705-716, Washington DC, April 1995a.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. “Economic Implications of an Accelerated Phase-Down of Farm Programs.” Special Rep., Washington DC, May 1995b.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Issues for the 1990's. Agr. Information Bull. No. 664, Washington DC, September 1994a.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. “The 1995 Farm Bill—Initiating the Discussion of Future Farm and Food Policy.” Unpub. paper (47 pp.) prepared in coordination with USDA Office of the Chief Economist, Washington DC, March 1994b.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Chief Economist. “Equity Analysis of Farm Program Legislation Since 1985.” Special Rep., Washington DC, April 1995.Google Scholar