Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T13:43:37.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cost-Size Relationships and Traditional Farmers' Economic Behavior*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

G. R. Soltani
G. R. Soltani*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Pahlavi University, Shiraz, Iran Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The degree of peasant response to innovations and prices has been a point of controversy among development economists. Some writers suggest that cultural and institutional factors restrain appropriate production adjustments. Others maintain that peasants in traditional agriculture respond rapidly to market incentives and are fairly efficient in allocating their resources among production altneratives. The approach and kind of data employed in testing these hypotheses have, to a large extent, contributed to this controversy.

Most empirical works relate variations in output and acreage to changing prices without considering climatic conditions as a contributing factor. It should be noted that for most crops, variation in output depends mainly on climatic conditions and fixed factors such as operator's labor and other traditional inputs.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , December 1976 , pp. 151 - 156
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The field work of this research was financially supported by the Agricultural Research Center, Pahlavi University, Shiraz, Iran. The reviewers' comments and suggestions are also acknowledged and appreciated.

References

[1] Behrman, J. R. “Supply Response and the Modernization of Peasant Agriculture: A Study of Four Major Annual Crops in Thailand,” presented at the International Congress of Orientalists', Ann Arbor, Michigan, August 17,1967.Google Scholar
[2] Dantwala, M. L. “The Problems of a Subsistance Farm Economy: The Indian Case,” in Warton, C. R. Jr., ed., Subsistance Agriculture and Economic Development, Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co., pp. 383–386, 1965.Google Scholar
[3] Doroudian, Reza. Modernization of Rural Economy in Iran, paper presented at ASPEN Perspolis Symposium, September 15–19,1975.Google Scholar
[4] Madden, J.P.Economics of Size in Farming, USDA, ERS, Agricultural Economics Report 107, February 1967.Google Scholar
[5] Medani, A.I. “Elasticity of the Marketable Surplus of a Subsistance Crop at Various Stages of Development,” Economic Development and Cultural Change, Volume 23, No. 3, pp. 421–430, April 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Schultz, T. W.Transforming Traditional Agriculture, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1964.Google Scholar