Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T23:08:35.293Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Consumer Demand for Mandatory Labeling of Beef from Cattle Administered Growth Hormones or Fed Genetically Modified Corn

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Jayson L. Lusk  and
John A. Fox
Jayson L. Lusk
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Mississippi State University
John A. Fox
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study estimates the value of policies that would mandate labeling of beef from cattle produced with growth hormones or fed genetically modified corn. At no cost, 85 percent of respondents desired mandatory labeling of beef produced with growth hormones and 64 percent of respondents preferred mandatory labeling of beef fed genetically modified corn. Estimates suggest that consumers would be willing to pay 17.0 percent and 10.6 percent higher prices for beef on average to obtain information provided via mandatory labeling about whether the beef is from cattle produced with growth hormones or fed genetically modified corn, respectively.

Keywords

beefcontingent valuationgenetically modified foodsgrowth hormonesmandatory labeling
Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , April 2002 , pp. 27 - 38
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akerlof, G.A. “The Market for ‘Lemons’: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 84(1970):488–500.Google Scholar
Antle, J.M. “The New Economics of Agriculture.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 81(1999):993–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agricultural Marketing Service. USDA. http://www.ams.usda.gov/lsg/certprog/certbeef.htm.Google Scholar
Bureau, J.C., Marette, S., and Schiavina, A.. “Non-Tariff Trade Barriers and Consumers' Information: The Case of the EU-US Trade Dispute Over Beef.” European Review of Agricultural Economics 25(1998):437–62.Google Scholar
Cameron, T.A. “A New paradigm for Valuing Non-market Goods Using Referendum Data: Maximum Likelihood Estimation by Censored Logistic Regression.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 15(September 1988):355–79.Google Scholar
Cameron, T.A. “Interval Estimates of Non-Market Resource Values from Referendum Contingent Valuation Surveys.” Land Economics 67(November 1991):413–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, T.A. and James, M.D.. “Efficiency Estimation Methods for Use with ‘Closed-Ended’ Contingent Valuation Survey Data.” Review of Economics and Statistics 69(May 1987):269–76.Google Scholar
Caswell, J.A. “How Labeling of Safety and Process Attributes Affects Markets for Food.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 27(Oc-tober 1998):151–58.Google Scholar
Caswell, J.A. and Mojduszda, E.M.. “Using Informational Labeling to Influence the Market for Quality in Food Products.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78(December 1996):1248–1253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caswell, J.A. and Padberg, D.I.. “Toward a More Comprehensive Theory of Food Labels.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 74(May 1992):461–468.Google Scholar
Cooper, J.C., Hanemann, M., and Signorello, G.. “One-and-One-Half-Bound Dichotomous-Choice Contingent Valuation.” University of California at Berkeley. Working Paper No. 921.Google Scholar
Darby, M.R. and Karni, E.. “Free competition and the Optimal Amount of Fraud.” Journal of Law and Economics 16(1973):67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Food Marketing Institute. “Trends 95: Consumer Attitudes and the Supermarket 1994.” Opinion Research. Washington, D.C. (1995).Google Scholar
Food Safety Inspection Service. USDA. “Mandatory Country of Origin Labeling of Imported Fresh Muscle Cuts of Beef and Lamb.” January 2000. Communications to Congress.Google Scholar
Fox, J.A., Shogren, J.F., Hayes, D.J., and Klie-benstein., J.B. “CVM-X: Calibrating Contingent Values with Experimental Auction Markets.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80(August 1998):455–465.Google Scholar
Greene, WH. Econometric Analysis. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River NJ: Prentice Hall, 2000.Google Scholar
Greene, W.H. Limdep. Version 7.0. Plainview, NY: Econometric Software, Inc., 1998.Google Scholar
Hadfield, G.K. and Thomson, D.. “An Information-Based Approach to Labeling Biotechnology Consumer Products.” Journal of Consumer Policy 21(1998):551–578.Google Scholar
Hanemann, W.M. “Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66(August 1984):332–41.Google Scholar
Hanemann, W.M. “Willingness To Pay and Willingness To Accept: How Much Can They Differ?” American Economic Review 81(June 1991):635–47.Google Scholar
Hanemann, W.M., Loomis, J., and Kanninen, B.. “Statistical Efficiency of Double-Bounded Di-chotomous Choice Contingent Valuation.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73(November 1991):1255–63.Google Scholar
Kenney, J. and Fallen, D.. “Livestock Hormones in the United States.” National Food Review. Economic Research Service (ERS), US Department of Agriculture (USDA). 12(1989):21–24.Google Scholar
Kuchler, F., McClelland, J., and Offutt, S.E.. “Regulating Food Safety: The Cost of Animal Growth Hormones.” National Food Review. Economic Research Service (ERS), US Department of Agriculture (USDA). 12(1989):25–33.Google Scholar
Lancaster, K. “A New Approach to Consumer Theory.” Journal of Political Economy 74(April 1966):132–57.Google Scholar
Latvala, T. and Kola, J.. “Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Information about Food Safety and Quality: Case Beef.” Paper presented at the International Agribusiness Management Association World Food and Agribusiness Congress. Chicago, Illinois, June, 2000.Google Scholar
Loureiro, M.L. and McCluskey, J.J.. “Assessing Consumer Response to Protected Geographical Identification Labeling.” Agribusiness 16(Summer 2000):309–20.Google Scholar
Lusk, J.L., Roosen, J., and Fox, J.A.. “Demand for Beef from Cattle Administered Growth Hormones or Fed Genetically Modified Corn: A Comparison of Consumers in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics (Forthcoming, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mojduszka, E.M. and Caswell, J.A.. “A Test of Nutritional Quality Signaling in Food Markets Prior to Implementation of Mandatory Labeling.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82(May 2000):298–309.Google Scholar
Mojduszka, E.M., Caswell, J.A., and Harris., J.M. “Consumer Choice of Food Products and the Implications for Price Competition and Government Policy.” Agribusiness 17(Winter 2001):31–104.Google Scholar
National Cattlemen's Beef Association. “Fact Sheet: Country-of-Origin Labeling.” Chuck Lambert, http://www.hill.beef.org/files/FSPP/beeflab.htm.Google Scholar
Patterson, D.A. and Duffield, J.W.. “Comment on Cameron's Censored Logistic Regression Model for Referendum Data.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 20(May 1991):275–83.Google Scholar
Schweikhardt, D. and Batie, S.. “Food and Folly.” Choices Third Quarter, 2000.Google Scholar
Smith, K. “Cloudy Window?” Choices Third Quarter, 2000.Google Scholar
Stumo, M. “Coexisting with Radical Agricultural Industrialists.” Choices Third Quarter, 2000.Google Scholar
Teisl, M.F., Bockstael, N.E., and Levy, A.. “Measuring the Welfare Effects of Nutritional Information.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83(February 2001):133–49.Google Scholar
Teisl, M.F. and Roe, B.. “The Economics of Labeling: An Overview of Issues for Health and Environmental Disclosure.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 27(October 1998):140–50.Google Scholar
Tweeten, L. “Coexisting with Alternative Agricultural Advocates.” Choices Second Quarter, 2000.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau, http://www.census.gov.Google Scholar