Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:19:59.779Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biodiesel as a Substitute for Petroleum Diesel in a Stochastic Environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Irfan Y. Tareen ,
Michael E. Wetzstein  and
James A. Duffield
Irfan Y. Tareen
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, The University of Georgia
Michael E. Wetzstein
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, The University of Georgia
James A. Duffield
Affiliation:
Office of Energy and New Uses, USDA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The objective of the research presented in this paper is the development of a stochastic adoption threshold. The option pricing approach for modeling investment under uncertainty is extended for the case of comparing two stochastic input prices associated with inputs that are perfect substitutes in a production process. Based on this methodology, a threshold decision rule influenced by the drift and volatility of these two input prices is developed. Theoretical results establish an empirical link for measuring the tradeoff of a relatively more expensive input (biodiesel) with lower price drift and volatility compared with a lower but more volatile priced input (petroleum diesel).

Keywords

Option pricingproductionrenewable fuelstechnology adoption under uncertainty
Type
Invited Paper Sessions
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , August 2000 , pp. 373 - 381
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahouissousi, N.B.C, and Wetzstein, M.E.. “A Comparative Cost Analysis of Biodiesel, Compressed Natural Gas, Methanol, and Diesel for the Transit Bus System.” Resource and Energy Economics December 1997.Google Scholar
Brown, Robert. “Biodiesel Makes Inroads in Fuels but High Price Still Weighs Hard.” Chemical Market Reporter 25 (1997):9.Google Scholar
Dixit, A.K. and Pindyck, R.S.. Investment Under Uncertainty. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmond, Mark. “Biodiesel, A Latecomer Alternative, Seeks Place in the Market.” National Petroleum News 86(1994):10.Google Scholar
Griffin, Ronald C, Lacewell, Ronald D., and Collins, Glenn S.. “Impacts of Substituting Plant Oils for Diesel Fuel.” Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 10(1985):410–412.Google Scholar
Hull, John C.Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives 3rd edition. Prentice Hall Press, N.J. 1997.Google Scholar
Griffin, Shay E.. “Diesel Fuel From Vegetable Oils: Status and Opportunities.” Biomass and Bioe-nergy 4(1993):227–242.Google Scholar
Sheehan, J., et al.Life Cycle Inventory of Biodiesel and Petroleum Diesel for Use in an Urban Bus: Final Report, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO. May 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tollefson, Chris. “Biodiesel Waits for Big Growth; Oils, Fats, & Waxes.” Chemical Market Reporter 244(1993):7–11.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service: Oil Crops Situation and Outlook Yearbook 1972-1998.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration: Monthly Energy Review 1972-1998.Google Scholar
Van Dyne, D.L., Webber, J.A., and Braschler, C.H.. “Macroeconomic Effects of a Community-Based Biodiesel Production System.” Biore-source Technology 56(1996):1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Withers, Russel V. and Noordam, Michelle D.M.. “Producing Biodiesel from Cannola in the Inland Northwest: An Economic Feasibility Study” Univ. of Idaho Coll. of Ag. Exp. Station Bulletin 785, April 1996.Google Scholar